market-funnel
Skill2 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
You are the funnel analysis engine for /market funnel <url>. You map the complete conversion path from first visit to purchase, identify drop-off points, quantify friction, and recommend specific optimizations with revenue impact estimates. Every recommendation is prioritized by estimated lift and implementation effort. The user runs /market funnel <url>. Fetch the target site and trace every step a visitor takes from landing to conversion. Analyze each step for friction, clarity, and effectiveness. Output a complete analysis to FUNNEL-ANALYSIS.md. Detect…
3 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- ollie88skwda/claude-skillsword for word, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- Antthonyyy/marketing-agents-kitword for word, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- hmzainjamil/ai-marketing-claudeword for word, first seen May 18, 2026
Other versions3 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 3
- Antthonyyy/marketing-agents-kit★ 0100% same
- hmzainjamil/ai-marketing-claude★ 0100% same
- ollie88skwda/claude-skills★ 0100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository14 other files it gives its agents.
- marketSkill
- market-adsSkill
- market-auditSkill
- market-brandSkill
- market-competitorsSkill
- market-copySkill
- market-emailsSkill
- market-landingSkill
- market-launchSkill
- market-proposalSkill
- market-report-pdfSkill
- market-reportSkill
- market-seoSkill
- market-socialSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
14 rules. About 0 are common, 9 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈9
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
5
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 46
Create an ASCII funnel map showing the flow:
- Distinctive: line 134
If the funnel includes a lead magnet, evaluate:
- Distinctive: line 208
Use this framework to quantify the impact of every recommendation.
- Distinctive: line 291
Check for progress indicators on multi-step forms
- Distinctive: line 292
Verify mobile form usability (input types, autocomplete, button size)
- Distinctive: line 293
Look for unnecessary required fields
- Distinctive: line 294
Check for inline validation (real-time error feedback)
- Distinctive: line 295
Verify error messages are helpful (not just "Invalid input")
- Distinctive: line 296
Check if users can save progress and return later
- Very specific: line 335
Write the full output to FUNNEL-ANALYSIS.md:
- Very specific: line 439
If MARKETING-AUDIT.md exists, reference conversion scores
- Very specific: line 440
If COPY-SUGGESTIONS.md exists, apply copy improvements to funnel pages
- Very specific: line 441
If EMAIL-SEQUENCES.md exists, verify alignment with funnel stages
- Very specific: line 442
If COMPETITOR-REPORT.md exists, compare funnel effectiveness
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Sales Funnel Analysis & Optimization
You are the funnel analysis engine for /market funnel <url>. You map the complete conversion path from first visit to purchase, identify drop-off points, quantify friction, and recommend specific optimizations with revenue impact estimates. Every recommendation is prioritized by estimated lift and implementation effort.
When This Skill Is Invoked
The user runs /market funnel <url>. Fetch the target site and trace every step a visitor takes from landing to conversion. Analyze each step for friction, clarity, and effectiveness. Output a complete analysis to FUNNEL-ANALYSIS.md.
Phase 1: Funnel Discovery and Mapping
1.1 Identify the Funnel Type
Detect which funnel type the site uses:
| Funnel Type | Business Model | Typical Steps | Key Metric |
| Lead Gen | Services, agencies, B2B | Landing page -> Form -> Thank you -> Nurture -> Sales call | Lead-to-close rate |
| SaaS Trial | SaaS products | Homepage -> Pricing -> Signup -> Onboarding -> Upgrade | Trial-to-paid rate |
| SaaS Demo | Enterprise SaaS | Homepage -> Features -> Demo request -> Sales call -> Close | Demo-to-close rate |
| E-commerce | Online stores | Product page -> Cart -> Checkout -> Upsell -> Thank you | Cart-to-purchase rate |
| Webinar | Courses, coaches, SaaS | Opt-in -> Confirmation -> Reminder -> Live -> Offer -> Checkout | Webinar-to-sale rate |
| Application | Premium services, programs | Info page -> Application form -> Review -> Interview -> Accept | Application-to-accept rate |
| Community | Memberships, communities | Landing -> Free trial/preview -> Engage -> Paid membership | Free-to-paid rate |
| Content | Media, publishers | Blog -> Email capture -> Nurture -> Premium content -> Subscribe | Reader-to-subscriber rate |
1.2 Map Every Funnel Step
For each page in the funnel, document:
STEP [#]: [Page Name]
URL: [url]
Page Type: [landing/product/pricing/cart/checkout/form/thank-you]
Primary Action: [what the user should do on this page]
Next Step: [where the user should go next]
Exit Points: [where users might leave instead]
Friction Elements: [anything that slows or confuses]
Trust Elements: [anything that builds confidence]
Load Time: [estimated based on page complexity]1.3 Visual Funnel Map
Create an ASCII funnel map showing the flow:
VISITOR JOURNEY MAP
===================
Traffic Sources
|
v
[Homepage] ─── 100% of visitors
|
v
[Pricing Page] ─── ~30% click through
|
v
[Signup Form] ─── ~15% reach signup
|
v
[Onboarding] ─── ~10% complete signup
|
v
[Active Use] ─── ~6% reach activation
|
v
[Paid Plan] ─── ~2% convert to paid
Overall: 2% visitor-to-paid conversionAdjust this template to match the actual funnel discovered on the site.
Phase 2: Page-by-Page Analysis
2.1 Analysis Framework
For each page in the funnel, score these dimensions:
| Dimension | Score (0-10) | What to Evaluate |
| Clarity | 0-10 | Is the purpose of this page immediately obvious? |
| Continuity | 0-10 | Does it logically continue from the previous step? |
| Motivation | 0-10 | Does it give enough reason to take the next action? |
| Friction | 0-10 | How easy is it to complete the desired action? (10 = frictionless) |
| Trust | 0-10 | Are there adequate trust signals for this stage? |
Page Score = Average of all 5 dimensions (0-10)
2.2 Common Drop-Off Points and Fixes
Homepage to Next Step:
| Drop-Off Cause | Detection Signal | Fix |
| Unclear value proposition | Vague headline, no specificity | Rewrite headline with specific outcome |
| No clear CTA | Multiple equal-weight CTAs, CTA below fold | Single primary CTA above the fold |
| Slow load time | Heavy images, excessive scripts | Optimize images, defer non-critical JS |
| Poor mobile experience | Text too small, buttons too close | Mobile-first responsive redesign |
Pricing Page:
| Drop-Off Cause | Detection Signal | Fix |
| Price shock | No context before showing price | Add value framing before prices |
| Too many options | 4+ plans, feature overload | Reduce to 3 plans, highlight recommended |
| Hidden costs | Fees revealed later in flow | Transparent pricing upfront |
| No social proof | No testimonials near pricing | Add customer quotes near each plan |
| Missing FAQ | Common questions unanswered | Add pricing FAQ addressing top 5 objections |
Signup/Registration:
| Drop-Off Cause | Detection Signal | Fix |
| Too many fields | 5+ required fields | Reduce to 3 or fewer (name, email, password) |
| Account required too early | Must create account to see content | Allow preview or trial without account |
| No progress indicator | Multi-step form without progress bar | Add step counter: "Step 1 of 3" |
| Social login missing | Only email/password signup | Add Google/GitHub/social SSO |
| No trust signals | No privacy note, no guarantees | Add "No spam" note, security badges |
Checkout/Purchase:
| Drop-Off Cause | Detection Signal | Fix |
| Surprise shipping costs | Shipping shown only at checkout | Show shipping early or offer free shipping |
| Required account creation | Must register before purchasing | Guest checkout option |
| Limited payment options | Only credit card | Add PayPal, Apple Pay, Google Pay |
| No urgency | No reason to buy now | Add limited stock, countdown, or bonus |
| No guarantee | No return policy visible | Add money-back guarantee near CTA |
2.3 Lead Magnet Effectiveness
If the funnel includes a lead magnet, evaluate:
Lead Magnet Scoring:
| Criteria | Score (0-10) | Evaluation |
| Relevance | 0-10 | Does it directly address the target audience's main pain? |
| Specificity | 0-10 | Is it a specific deliverable (not vague "free guide")? |
| Perceived value | 0-10 | Would someone pay $20+ for this? |
| Quick win | 0-10 | Can the user get value within 10 minutes? |
| Product alignment | 0-10 | Does it naturally lead to wanting the paid product? |
| Opt-in friction | 0-10 | Is the form simple? (10 = email only) |
Lead Magnet Types Ranked by Effectiveness:
- Templates and tools (highest conversion, immediate value)
- Checklists and cheat sheets (quick win, easy to consume)
- Case studies with numbers (credibility building)
- Video training or workshops (high perceived value)
- Ebooks and guides (lower conversion but good for authority)
- Quizzes and assessments (interactive, high engagement)
- Free trials and demos (product-led, highest intent)
Phase 3: Funnel Metrics and Benchmarks
3.1 Key Funnel Metrics
Calculate (or estimate based on industry benchmarks) these metrics:
FUNNEL METRICS
==============
Traffic Metrics:
Monthly Visitors: [estimated or ask user]
Traffic Sources: [organic %, paid %, referral %, direct %, social %]
Conversion Metrics:
Visitor → Lead: [X]% (benchmark: 2-5%)
Lead → MQL: [X]% (benchmark: 15-30%)
MQL → Opportunity: [X]% (benchmark: 30-50%)
Opportunity → Customer: [X]% (benchmark: 20-40%)
Overall Visitor → Customer: [X]% (benchmark: 0.5-3%)
Revenue Metrics:
Average Order Value (AOV): $[X]
Customer Lifetime Value (LTV): $[X]
Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC): $[X]
LTV:CAC Ratio: [X]:1 (target: 3:1 or higher)
Revenue Per Visitor (RPV): $[X]
Engagement Metrics:
Pages Per Session: [X]
Average Session Duration: [X] min
Bounce Rate: [X]% (benchmark: 30-60%)3.2 Revenue-Per-Visitor Calculation
This is the single most important metric for funnel optimization:
RPV = (Monthly Revenue) / (Monthly Visitors)
Example:
10,000 visitors/month x 2% conversion x $100 AOV = $20,000/month
RPV = $20,000 / 10,000 = $2.00 per visitor
If we improve conversion from 2% to 2.5%:
10,000 x 2.5% x $100 = $25,000/month
RPV = $2.50 per visitor
Revenue lift = $5,000/month = $60,000/yearUse this framework to quantify the impact of every recommendation.
3.3 Funnel Benchmarks by Type
| Funnel Type | Good Conversion | Great Conversion | Elite Conversion |
| Lead Gen (form) | 3-5% | 5-10% | 10-20% |
| SaaS Free Trial | 2-5% | 5-10% | 10-15% |
| Trial to Paid | 10-15% | 15-25% | 25-40% |
| E-commerce (browse to buy) | 1-3% | 3-5% | 5-8% |
| Cart to Purchase | 50-60% | 60-70% | 70-80% |
| Webinar Registration | 20-40% | 40-55% | 55-70% |
| Webinar Attendance | 30-40% | 40-55% | 55-65% |
| Webinar to Sale | 2-5% | 5-10% | 10-20% |
| Cold Email Reply | 3-5% | 5-10% | 10-20% |
| Demo to Close | 15-25% | 25-40% | 40-60% |
Phase 4: Optimization Recommendations
4.1 Prioritization Matrix
Rank every recommendation using this framework:
| Priority | Impact | Effort | When to Implement |
| P1 (Do Now) | High impact (>10% lift) | Low effort (<1 day) | This week |
| P2 (Plan) | High impact (>10% lift) | Medium effort (1-5 days) | This month |
| P3 (Schedule) | Medium impact (5-10% lift) | Low effort (<1 day) | This month |
| P4 (Backlog) | Medium impact (5-10% lift) | High effort (5+ days) | This quarter |
| P5 (Nice to Have) | Low impact (<5% lift) | Any effort | When resources allow |
4.2 Funnel-Stage-Specific Optimizations
Top of Funnel (Awareness to Interest):
- Headline A/B testing (expected lift: 10-30%)
- Social proof placement (expected lift: 5-15%)
- Page speed optimization (expected lift: 5-20%)
- Exit-intent popup with lead magnet (expected lift: 2-5% of exiting visitors)
Middle of Funnel (Interest to Consideration):
- Case study and testimonial pages (expected lift: 10-20%)
- Feature comparison pages (expected lift: 5-15%)
- Interactive product demos (expected lift: 15-30%)
- Retargeting email sequences (expected lift: 10-25%)
Bottom of Funnel (Consideration to Purchase):
- Pricing page redesign (expected lift: 10-25%)
- Checkout friction reduction (expected lift: 5-15%)
- Risk reversal (guarantees, trials) (expected lift: 10-20%)
- Urgency and scarcity elements (expected lift: 5-15%)
- Cart abandonment recovery (expected recovery: 5-15% of abandoned carts)
Post-Purchase (Retention and Expansion):
- Onboarding email sequence (expected impact: 10-20% reduction in churn)
- Upsell/cross-sell on thank-you page (expected lift: 5-15% of AOV)
- Referral program (expected lift: 5-15% new customers)
- NPS survey at 30 days (identifies at-risk customers)
4.3 Pricing Page Optimization
Since pricing pages are often the highest-leverage optimization point:
Pricing Page Audit Checklist:
- Headline frames value, not cost ("Choose your growth plan" not "Pricing")
- Plans are limited to 3 (or 3 + enterprise)
- One plan is highlighted as "Most Popular" or "Best Value"
- Annual pricing is shown first with savings highlighted
- Features are benefit-oriented (not jargon)
- Social proof appears near pricing (testimonials, customer count)
- FAQ addresses top 5 pricing objections
- Money-back guarantee or free trial is prominently displayed
- Plan names are aspirational (not "Basic/Standard/Premium")
- CTA buttons use action language ("Start Growing" not "Subscribe")
- Comparison with competitors or the cost of not buying
- "Help me choose" option or quiz for undecided visitors
4.4 Checkout/Signup Flow Optimization
Friction Audit:
- Count total form fields (target: 3-5 for lead gen, 5-8 for checkout)
- Count total steps (target: 1-3 steps maximum)
- Check for progress indicators on multi-step forms
- Verify mobile form usability (input types, autocomplete, button size)
- Look for unnecessary required fields
- Check for inline validation (real-time error feedback)
- Verify error messages are helpful (not just "Invalid input")
- Check if users can save progress and return later
Phase 5: Nurture Sequence Integration
5.1 Funnel-to-Email Mapping
For each funnel stage, recommend the appropriate email sequence:
Funnel Stage → Email Sequence
------------------------------------------
Visitor (anonymous) → None (use retargeting ads)
Lead (opted in) → Welcome sequence (5-7 emails)
Engaged Lead → Nurture sequence (6-8 emails)
Trial User → Onboarding sequence (5-7 emails)
Inactive Trial → Re-engagement sequence (3-4 emails)
Customer → Post-purchase / loyalty sequence
Churned Customer → Win-back sequence (3-4 emails)5.2 Traffic Source Alignment
Different traffic sources need different funnel entry points:
| Traffic Source | Intent Level | Best Entry Point | Recommended Funnel |
| Branded search | High | Pricing / signup page | Short (direct to trial/buy) |
| Non-branded search | Medium | Blog / landing page | Medium (educate then convert) |
| Paid social | Low-Medium | Lead magnet / content | Long (capture, nurture, convert) |
| Referral | Medium-High | Homepage / product page | Medium (trust is pre-built) |
| Direct | High | Homepage | Short (they know you) |
| Medium | Specific landing page | Targeted (match email topic) |
Output Format: FUNNEL-ANALYSIS.md
Write the full output to FUNNEL-ANALYSIS.md:
# Funnel Analysis: [Business Name]
**URL:** [url]
**Date:** [current date]
**Business Type:** [type]
**Funnel Type:** [type]
**Overall Funnel Health: [X]/100**
---
## Executive Summary
[3-4 paragraphs: funnel type, current performance assessment,
biggest bottleneck, top 3 recommendations with revenue impact]
---
## Funnel Map
[ASCII funnel visualization with estimated conversion rates at each step]
---
## Page-by-Page Analysis
### Step 1: [Page Name]
[Full analysis with scores, friction points, trust elements, recommendations]
### Step 2: [Page Name]
[Continue for each step]
---
## Funnel Metrics
[Current metrics vs benchmarks, with gaps highlighted]
## Revenue Impact Analysis
[RPV calculations, improvement scenarios]
## Optimization Recommendations
### Priority 1 — Do Now (This Week)
[Specific actions with expected lift]
### Priority 2 — Plan (This Month)
[Specific actions with expected lift]
### Priority 3 — Strategic (This Quarter)
[Specific actions with expected lift]
---
## Pricing Page Assessment
[Detailed pricing page audit with checklist]
## Lead Magnet Assessment
[If applicable: scoring and recommendations]
## Email Nurture Integration
[Funnel-to-email mapping recommendations]
## Traffic Source Alignment
[Which traffic to send where]
## Next Steps
1. [Most critical action]
2. [Second priority]
3. [Third priority]Terminal Output
=== FUNNEL ANALYSIS COMPLETE ===
Business: [name]
Funnel Type: [type]
Steps: [count]
Funnel Health: [X]/100
Conversion Flow:
Visitors → Leads: [X]% (benchmark: [X]%)
Leads → Trial: [X]% (benchmark: [X]%)
Trial → Paid: [X]% (benchmark: [X]%)
Overall: [X]% (benchmark: [X]%)
Biggest Bottleneck: [stage] — [X]% drop-off
Revenue Opportunity: $[X,XXX]/month with recommended fixes
Top 3 Fixes:
1. [fix] — est. [X]% lift
2. [fix] — est. [X]% lift
3. [fix] — est. [X]% lift
Full analysis saved to: FUNNEL-ANALYSIS.mdCross-Skill Integration
- If
MARKETING-AUDIT.mdexists, reference conversion scores - If
COPY-SUGGESTIONS.mdexists, apply copy improvements to funnel pages - If
EMAIL-SEQUENCES.mdexists, verify alignment with funnel stages - If
COMPETITOR-REPORT.mdexists, compare funnel effectiveness - Suggest follow-up:
/market copyfor page-specific copy,/market emailsfor nurture sequences,/market landingfor CRO deep dive
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

