agentleFS
swsounds42swsounds42/claude-dotfiles/skills/web-quality-audit/SKILL.md

web-quality-audit

Skill0 starsChanged 41 days agoMITView on GitHub

Run an evidence-led web quality audit covering performance, accessibility, SEO, best practices, and agentic browsing. Use when asked to "audit my site", "review web quality", "run lighthouse audit", "check page quality", or "optimize my website".

21 other projects use a version of this, 18 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use clean-code, writing-beats and 8 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • xenitV1Skill

    clean-code

    Pragmatic coding standards - concise, direct, no over-engineering, no unnecessary comments

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • LesaniSkill

    writing-beats

    Shape an article as a journey of beats, choose-your-own-adventure style. The user picks a starting beat from the raw material, you write only that beat, then offer options for where to pivot next, beat by beat, until the article reaches a natural end. Use when the user has raw material and wants to assemble it as a narrative rather than an argument.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • JetBrainsSkill

    canvas-design

    Create beautiful visual art in .png and .pdf documents using design philosophy. You should use this skill when the user asks to create a poster, piece of art, design, or other static piece. Create original visual designs, never copying existing artists' work to avoid copyright violations.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • CloudflareSkill

    receiving-code-review

    Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • OpenAISkill

    executing-plans

    Use when you have a written implementation plan to execute in a separate session with review checkpoints

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • OpenAISkill

    subagent-driven-development

    Use when executing implementation plans with independent tasks in the current session

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • +2 more from openai

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

22 rules. 11 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.

  • 11

    Common

    Most of the 21 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 6

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 5

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    If a page can run, read the measurement workflow and collect a minimal live baseline before searching the codebase broadly.

    line 19
  2. Distinctive:

    Use runtime failures to localize source inspection.

    line 20
  3. Distinctive:

    Use the best capability already available.

    line 26
  4. Very specific:

    Compress images: Use WebP/AVIF with fallbacks.

    line 48
  5. Common:

    Minimize JavaScript: Remove unused code. Use code splitting.

    line 49
  6. Very specific:

    Efficient fonts: Use font-display: swap. Preload critical fonts.

    line 51
  7. Very specific:

    Preconnect to origins: Add <link rel="preconnect"> for third-party domains.

    line 54
  8. Very specific:

    Text alternatives: Every <img> has meaningful alt text.

    line 62
  9. Common:

    Don't rely on color alone: Use icons, patterns, or text alongside color indicators.

    line 64
  10. Common:

    Keyboard accessible: All functionality available via keyboard.

    line 68
  11. Common:

    Labels and instructions: All form inputs have associated labels.

    line 77
  12. Common:

    Valid HTML: No duplicate IDs. Properly nested elements.

    line 80
  13. Common:

    ARIA used correctly: Prefer native elements. ARIA roles match behavior.

    line 81
  14. Common:

    No noindex on important pages: Check meta robots and headers.

    line 90
  15. Distinctive:

    Meta descriptions: Write useful, page-specific summaries.

    line 94
  16. Distinctive:

    Page experience signals: Use field Core Web Vitals as evidence, without promising a ranking change.

    line 101
  17. Common:

    HTTPS everywhere: No mixed content. HSTS enabled.

    line 107
  18. Common:

    No vulnerable libraries: Keep dependencies updated.

    line 108
  19. Very specific:

    Valid doctype: Use <!DOCTYPE html>.

    line 114
  20. Common:

    Clear permission requests: Only ask when needed, with context.

    line 120
  21. Distinctive:

    Use the Lighthouse Agentic Browsing results as technical signals for how well assistants can understand and interact with the rendered page.

    line 125
  22. Common:

    When performing an audit, structure findings as:

    line 143

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 21 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Web quality audit

Comprehensive quality review that combines live browser evidence with source inspection. Covers Performance, Accessibility, SEO, Best Practices, and Agentic Browsing without treating an aggregate score as proof of quality.

Lighthouse 13+. The Performance category now uses shared Performance Insights across Lighthouse and the DevTools Performance panel (announcement). Follow current insight names and evidence. Do not require removed audit IDs or automatically recreate their recommendations; some were retired because they were noisy, inactionable, or easy to over-recommend.

How it works

  1. Establish the audit target: representative URLs, important states and journeys, public versus authenticated access, and mobile/desktop scope.
  2. If a page can run, read the measurement workflow and collect a minimal live baseline before searching the codebase broadly.
  3. Use runtime failures to localize source inspection. Keep measured findings separate from hypotheses found only in code.
  4. Categorize by user impact and confidence, then make or recommend specific fixes.
  5. Re-run equivalent automated checks and the affected manual flows. Report what is verified and what still needs field or human validation.

Tool routing

Use the best capability already available; do not block the audit on optional setup.

NeedPreferred routeFallback
Performance and Core Web VitalsRecord a browser performance trace and analyze focused insights; with Chrome DevTools MCP, use performance_start_trace then performance_analyze_insightLighthouse CLI or PageSpeed Insights lab data
Real-user performanceCrUX values included in current DevTools trace summariesPageSpeed Insights/CrUX Vis; direct CrUX API only when a key is already available or automation is requested
Accessibility, SEO, Best Practices, Agentic BrowsingRun a live Lighthouse audit; with Chrome DevTools MCP, use lighthouse_auditCategory-specific Lighthouse CLI audits plus manual checks
Rendered semantics and interactionInspect the accessibility tree and exercise the UI; with Chrome DevTools MCP, use take_snapshot and focused evaluate_scriptBrowser/manual testing
Source smoke testscripts/analyze.sh <path>Direct source inspection

Chrome DevTools MCP's lighthouse_audit intentionally excludes performance. Its navigation mode reloads the page; use snapshot mode when preserving the current authenticated or user-created state matters. The static analyzer is a fast smoke test, not a substitute for a rendered-page audit.

Audit categories

Performance

Core Web Vitals — Must pass for good page experience:

  • LCP (Largest Contentful Paint) < 2.5s. The largest visible element must render quickly. Optimize images, fonts, and server response time.
  • INP (Interaction to Next Paint) < 200ms. User interactions must feel instant. Reduce JavaScript execution time and break up long tasks.
  • CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift) < 0.1. Content must not jump around. Set explicit dimensions on images, embeds, and ads.

Resource Optimization:

  • Compress images. Use WebP/AVIF with fallbacks. Serve correctly sized images via srcset.
  • Minimize JavaScript. Remove unused code. Use code splitting. Defer non-critical scripts.
  • Optimize CSS. Extract critical CSS. Remove unused styles. Avoid @import.
  • Efficient fonts. Use font-display: swap. Preload critical fonts. Subset to needed characters.

Loading Strategy:

  • Preconnect to origins. Add <link rel="preconnect"> for third-party domains.
  • Preload critical assets. LCP images, fonts, and above-fold CSS.
  • Lazy load below-fold content. Images, iframes, and heavy components.
  • Cache effectively. Long cache TTLs for static assets. Immutable caching for hashed files.

Accessibility

Perceivable:

  • Text alternatives. Every <img> has meaningful alt text. Decorative images use alt="".
  • Color contrast. Minimum 4.5:1 for normal text, 3:1 for large text (WCAG AA).
  • Don't rely on color alone. Use icons, patterns, or text alongside color indicators.
  • Captions and transcripts. Video has captions. Audio has transcripts.

Operable:

  • Keyboard accessible. All functionality available via keyboard. No keyboard traps.
  • Focus visible. Clear focus indicators on all interactive elements.
  • Skip links. Provide "Skip to main content" for keyboard users.
  • Sufficient time. Users can extend time limits. No auto-advancing content without controls.

Understandable:

  • Page language. Set lang attribute on <html>.
  • Consistent navigation. Same navigation structure across pages.
  • Error identification. Form errors clearly described and associated with fields.
  • Labels and instructions. All form inputs have associated labels.

Robust:

  • Valid HTML. No duplicate IDs. Properly nested elements.
  • ARIA used correctly. Prefer native elements. ARIA roles match behavior.
  • Name, role, value. Interactive elements have accessible names and correct roles.

SEO

Crawlability:

  • Valid robots.txt. Doesn't block important resources.
  • XML sitemap. Lists all important pages. Submitted to Search Console.
  • Canonical URLs. Prevent duplicate content issues.
  • No noindex on important pages. Check meta robots and headers.

On-Page SEO:

  • Unique title tags. Make each title descriptive and concise; display truncation varies by device and result type.
  • Meta descriptions. Write useful, page-specific summaries; search engines may choose a different snippet.
  • Heading hierarchy. The primary heading is descriptive and the structure is logical; do not fail valid HTML solely for using more than one <h1>.
  • Descriptive link text. Not "click here" or "read more".

Technical SEO:

  • Mobile-friendly. Responsive design. Tap targets ≥ 48px.
  • HTTPS. Secure connection required.
  • Page experience signals. Use field Core Web Vitals as evidence, without promising a ranking change.
  • Structured data. JSON-LD for rich snippets (Article, Product, FAQ, etc.).

Best practices

Security:

  • HTTPS everywhere. No mixed content. HSTS enabled.
  • No vulnerable libraries. Keep dependencies updated.
  • CSP headers. Content Security Policy to prevent XSS.
  • No exposed source maps. In production builds.

Modern Standards:

  • No deprecated APIs. Replace document.write, synchronous XHR, etc.
  • Valid doctype. Use <!DOCTYPE html>.
  • Charset declared. <meta charset="UTF-8"> as first element in <head>.
  • No browser errors. Clean console. No CORS issues.

UX Patterns:

  • No intrusive interstitials. Especially on mobile.
  • Clear permission requests. Only ask when needed, with context.
  • No misleading buttons. Buttons do what they say.

Agentic browsing

Use the Lighthouse Agentic Browsing results as technical signals for how well assistants can understand and interact with the rendered page.

  • Accessible interaction surface. Semantic HTML, labels, names, roles, and states must expose meaningful controls in the accessibility tree.
  • WebMCP integrations are valid when present. Review registered tools, schemas, and form coverage; do not add WebMCP solely to raise an audit score.
  • llms.txt is optional. A valid file may help compatible tools discover curated content, but a Lighthouse pass does not prove that search or AI products will ingest, rank, or cite it.
  • Keep this category separate from SEO claims. Agentic browsability is not evidence of search ranking or AI visibility.

Severity levels

LevelDescriptionAction
CriticalSecurity vulnerabilities, complete failuresFix immediately
HighCore Web Vitals failures, major a11y barriersFix before launch
MediumPerformance opportunities, SEO improvementsFix within sprint
LowMinor optimizations, code qualityFix when convenient

Audit output format

When performing an audit, structure findings as:

## Audit results

### Evidence
| Signal | Scope/conditions | Result | Source |
|--------|------------------|--------|--------|
| LCP | URL, phone, p75/28 days | 3.1s (needs improvement) | CrUX |
| Accessibility | URL, mobile navigation | 92 | Lighthouse |

### Critical issues (X found)
- **[Category]** Issue description. File: `path/to/file.js:123`
  - **Impact:** Why this matters
  - **Evidence:** Measured failure, runtime observation, or source hypothesis
  - **Fix:** Specific code change or recommendation

### High priority (X found)
...

### Summary
- Performance: measured status and X findings
- Accessibility: automated status, X findings, manual checks pending/passed
- SEO: X findings
- Best Practices: X findings
- Agentic Browsing: X findings or not available

### Recommended priority
1. First fix this because...
2. Then address...
3. Finally optimize...

### Verification
- Re-run results under the same conditions
- Manual checks completed
- Field validation still pending

Quick checklist

Before every deploy

  • Core Web Vitals passing
  • No accessibility errors (axe/Lighthouse)
  • No console errors
  • HTTPS working
  • Meta tags present

Weekly review

  • Check Search Console for issues
  • Review Core Web Vitals trends
  • Update dependencies
  • Test with screen reader

Monthly deep dive

  • Full Lighthouse audit
  • Performance profiling
  • Accessibility audit with real users
  • SEO keyword review

References

For detailed guidelines on specific areas:

  • Performance Optimization
  • Core Web Vitals
  • Accessibility
  • SEO
  • Best Practices

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.