web-quality-audit
Skill0 starsChanged 41 days agoMITView on GitHub
Run an evidence-led web quality audit covering performance, accessibility, SEO, best practices, and agentic browsing. Use when asked to "audit my site", "review web quality", "run lighthouse audit", "check page quality", or "optimize my website".
21 other projects use a version of this, 18 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- Mahesh-Bishnoi/skillsedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- drinkspiller/skillsedited, first seen Nov 6, 2026
- its-ash/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- xuweizhengo/skills-hubedited, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- damacus/agent-skillsedited, first seen Oct 29, 2026
- viasrijan/crazy-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use clean-code, writing-beats and 8 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
xenitV1Skillclean-code
Pragmatic coding standards - concise, direct, no over-engineering, no unnecessary comments
Also in 4 projects that use this
LesaniSkillwriting-beats
Shape an article as a journey of beats, choose-your-own-adventure style. The user picks a starting beat from the raw material, you write only that beat, then offer options for where to pivot next, beat by beat, until the article reaches a natural end. Use when the user has raw material and wants to assemble it as a narrative rather than an argument.
Also in 3 projects that use this
JetBrainsSkillcanvas-design
Create beautiful visual art in .png and .pdf documents using design philosophy. You should use this skill when the user asks to create a poster, piece of art, design, or other static piece. Create original visual designs, never copying existing artists' work to avoid copyright violations.
Also in 5 projects that use this
CloudflareSkillreceiving-code-review
Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation
Also in 4 projects that use this
OpenAISkillexecuting-plans
Use when you have a written implementation plan to execute in a separate session with review checkpoints
Also in 4 projects that use this
OpenAISkillsubagent-driven-development
Use when executing implementation plans with independent tasks in the current session
Also in 4 projects that use this
- +2 more from openai
Other versions21 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 18
- midudev/preguntas-entrevista-react★ 7.8k78% same
- MiladJoodi/skills★ 2496% same
- PracticalSwan/agent-skills★ 2274% same
- RodrigoTomeES/getmcp★ 1378% same
- xuweizhengo/skills-hub★ 498% same
- neronain/ClaudeSkills-Neronain★ 369% same
- damacus/agent-skills★ 299% same
- Mahesh-Bishnoi/skills★ 218% same
- miptah21/skills★ 276% same
- drinkspiller/skills★ 168% same
8 more not listed
Wrote their own version · 3
- markoblogo/abvx-agent-skills★ 16same name
- its-ash/skills★ 0same name
- viasrijan/crazy-skills★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository42 other files it gives its agents.
- skills/composition-patterns/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/react-view-transitions/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/vercel-optimize/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- skills/last30days/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- banner-designSkill
- brandSkill
- cascade-brainSkill
- cascade-discoverSkill
- cavemanSkill
- cdt-a11y-debuggingSkill
- cdt-chrome-devtools-cliSkill
- cdt-chrome-devtoolsSkill
- cdt-cookie-debuggingSkill
- cdt-debug-optimize-lcpSkill
- cdt-memory-leak-debuggingSkill
- cdt-troubleshootingSkill
- vercel-composition-patternsSkill
- core-web-vitalsSkill
- designSkill
- design-systemSkill
- efficiencySkill
- email-best-practicesSkill
- frontend-slidesSkill
- grill-with-docsSkill
- humanizerSkill
- improve-codebase-architectureSkill
- job-search-kitSkill
- last30daysSkill
- react-emailSkill
- vercel-react-view-transitionsSkill
- seo-localSkill
- seo-mapsSkill
- slidesSkill
- ui-stylingSkill
- ui-ux-pro-maxSkill
- vercel-optimizeSkill
- web-design-guidelinesSkill
- wq-accessibilitySkill
- wq-best-practicesSkill
- wq-performanceSkill
- wq-seoSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
22 rules. 11 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.
11
Common
Most of the 21 edited versions we read keep these.
6
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
5
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 19
If a page can run, read the measurement workflow and collect a minimal live baseline before searching the codebase broadly.
- Distinctive: line 20
Use runtime failures to localize source inspection.
- Distinctive: line 26
Use the best capability already available.
- Very specific: line 48
Compress images: Use WebP/AVIF with fallbacks.
- Common: line 49
Minimize JavaScript: Remove unused code. Use code splitting.
- Very specific: line 51
Efficient fonts: Use font-display: swap. Preload critical fonts.
- Very specific: line 54
Preconnect to origins: Add <link rel="preconnect"> for third-party domains.
- Very specific: line 62
Text alternatives: Every <img> has meaningful alt text.
- Common: line 64
Don't rely on color alone: Use icons, patterns, or text alongside color indicators.
- Common: line 68
Keyboard accessible: All functionality available via keyboard.
- Common: line 77
Labels and instructions: All form inputs have associated labels.
- Common: line 80
Valid HTML: No duplicate IDs. Properly nested elements.
- Common: line 81
ARIA used correctly: Prefer native elements. ARIA roles match behavior.
- Common: line 90
No noindex on important pages: Check meta robots and headers.
- Distinctive: line 94
Meta descriptions: Write useful, page-specific summaries.
- Distinctive: line 101
Page experience signals: Use field Core Web Vitals as evidence, without promising a ranking change.
- Common: line 107
HTTPS everywhere: No mixed content. HSTS enabled.
- Common: line 108
No vulnerable libraries: Keep dependencies updated.
- Very specific: line 114
Valid doctype: Use <!DOCTYPE html>.
- Common: line 120
Clear permission requests: Only ask when needed, with context.
- Distinctive: line 125
Use the Lighthouse Agentic Browsing results as technical signals for how well assistants can understand and interact with the rendered page.
- Common: line 143
When performing an audit, structure findings as:
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 21 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Web quality audit
Comprehensive quality review that combines live browser evidence with source inspection. Covers Performance, Accessibility, SEO, Best Practices, and Agentic Browsing without treating an aggregate score as proof of quality.
Lighthouse 13+. The Performance category now uses shared Performance Insights across Lighthouse and the DevTools Performance panel (announcement). Follow current insight names and evidence. Do not require removed audit IDs or automatically recreate their recommendations; some were retired because they were noisy, inactionable, or easy to over-recommend.
How it works
- Establish the audit target: representative URLs, important states and journeys, public versus authenticated access, and mobile/desktop scope.
- If a page can run, read the measurement workflow and collect a minimal live baseline before searching the codebase broadly.
- Use runtime failures to localize source inspection. Keep measured findings separate from hypotheses found only in code.
- Categorize by user impact and confidence, then make or recommend specific fixes.
- Re-run equivalent automated checks and the affected manual flows. Report what is verified and what still needs field or human validation.
Tool routing
Use the best capability already available; do not block the audit on optional setup.
| Need | Preferred route | Fallback |
| Performance and Core Web Vitals | Record a browser performance trace and analyze focused insights; with Chrome DevTools MCP, use performance_start_trace then performance_analyze_insight | Lighthouse CLI or PageSpeed Insights lab data |
| Real-user performance | CrUX values included in current DevTools trace summaries | PageSpeed Insights/CrUX Vis; direct CrUX API only when a key is already available or automation is requested |
| Accessibility, SEO, Best Practices, Agentic Browsing | Run a live Lighthouse audit; with Chrome DevTools MCP, use lighthouse_audit | Category-specific Lighthouse CLI audits plus manual checks |
| Rendered semantics and interaction | Inspect the accessibility tree and exercise the UI; with Chrome DevTools MCP, use take_snapshot and focused evaluate_script | Browser/manual testing |
| Source smoke test | scripts/analyze.sh <path> | Direct source inspection |
Chrome DevTools MCP's lighthouse_audit intentionally excludes performance. Its navigation mode reloads the page; use snapshot mode when preserving the current authenticated or user-created state matters. The static analyzer is a fast smoke test, not a substitute for a rendered-page audit.
Audit categories
Performance
Core Web Vitals — Must pass for good page experience:
- LCP (Largest Contentful Paint) < 2.5s. The largest visible element must render quickly. Optimize images, fonts, and server response time.
- INP (Interaction to Next Paint) < 200ms. User interactions must feel instant. Reduce JavaScript execution time and break up long tasks.
- CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift) < 0.1. Content must not jump around. Set explicit dimensions on images, embeds, and ads.
Resource Optimization:
- Compress images. Use WebP/AVIF with fallbacks. Serve correctly sized images via
srcset. - Minimize JavaScript. Remove unused code. Use code splitting. Defer non-critical scripts.
- Optimize CSS. Extract critical CSS. Remove unused styles. Avoid
@import. - Efficient fonts. Use
font-display: swap. Preload critical fonts. Subset to needed characters.
Loading Strategy:
- Preconnect to origins. Add
<link rel="preconnect">for third-party domains. - Preload critical assets. LCP images, fonts, and above-fold CSS.
- Lazy load below-fold content. Images, iframes, and heavy components.
- Cache effectively. Long cache TTLs for static assets. Immutable caching for hashed files.
Accessibility
Perceivable:
- Text alternatives. Every
<img>has meaningfulalttext. Decorative images usealt="". - Color contrast. Minimum 4.5:1 for normal text, 3:1 for large text (WCAG AA).
- Don't rely on color alone. Use icons, patterns, or text alongside color indicators.
- Captions and transcripts. Video has captions. Audio has transcripts.
Operable:
- Keyboard accessible. All functionality available via keyboard. No keyboard traps.
- Focus visible. Clear focus indicators on all interactive elements.
- Skip links. Provide "Skip to main content" for keyboard users.
- Sufficient time. Users can extend time limits. No auto-advancing content without controls.
Understandable:
- Page language. Set
langattribute on<html>. - Consistent navigation. Same navigation structure across pages.
- Error identification. Form errors clearly described and associated with fields.
- Labels and instructions. All form inputs have associated labels.
Robust:
- Valid HTML. No duplicate IDs. Properly nested elements.
- ARIA used correctly. Prefer native elements. ARIA roles match behavior.
- Name, role, value. Interactive elements have accessible names and correct roles.
SEO
Crawlability:
- Valid robots.txt. Doesn't block important resources.
- XML sitemap. Lists all important pages. Submitted to Search Console.
- Canonical URLs. Prevent duplicate content issues.
- No noindex on important pages. Check meta robots and headers.
On-Page SEO:
- Unique title tags. Make each title descriptive and concise; display truncation varies by device and result type.
- Meta descriptions. Write useful, page-specific summaries; search engines may choose a different snippet.
- Heading hierarchy. The primary heading is descriptive and the structure is logical; do not fail valid HTML solely for using more than one
<h1>. - Descriptive link text. Not "click here" or "read more".
Technical SEO:
- Mobile-friendly. Responsive design. Tap targets ≥ 48px.
- HTTPS. Secure connection required.
- Page experience signals. Use field Core Web Vitals as evidence, without promising a ranking change.
- Structured data. JSON-LD for rich snippets (Article, Product, FAQ, etc.).
Best practices
Security:
- HTTPS everywhere. No mixed content. HSTS enabled.
- No vulnerable libraries. Keep dependencies updated.
- CSP headers. Content Security Policy to prevent XSS.
- No exposed source maps. In production builds.
Modern Standards:
- No deprecated APIs. Replace
document.write, synchronous XHR, etc. - Valid doctype. Use
<!DOCTYPE html>. - Charset declared.
<meta charset="UTF-8">as first element in<head>. - No browser errors. Clean console. No CORS issues.
UX Patterns:
- No intrusive interstitials. Especially on mobile.
- Clear permission requests. Only ask when needed, with context.
- No misleading buttons. Buttons do what they say.
Agentic browsing
Use the Lighthouse Agentic Browsing results as technical signals for how well assistants can understand and interact with the rendered page.
- Accessible interaction surface. Semantic HTML, labels, names, roles, and states must expose meaningful controls in the accessibility tree.
- WebMCP integrations are valid when present. Review registered tools, schemas, and form coverage; do not add WebMCP solely to raise an audit score.
llms.txtis optional. A valid file may help compatible tools discover curated content, but a Lighthouse pass does not prove that search or AI products will ingest, rank, or cite it.- Keep this category separate from SEO claims. Agentic browsability is not evidence of search ranking or AI visibility.
Severity levels
| Level | Description | Action |
| Critical | Security vulnerabilities, complete failures | Fix immediately |
| High | Core Web Vitals failures, major a11y barriers | Fix before launch |
| Medium | Performance opportunities, SEO improvements | Fix within sprint |
| Low | Minor optimizations, code quality | Fix when convenient |
Audit output format
When performing an audit, structure findings as:
## Audit results
### Evidence
| Signal | Scope/conditions | Result | Source |
|--------|------------------|--------|--------|
| LCP | URL, phone, p75/28 days | 3.1s (needs improvement) | CrUX |
| Accessibility | URL, mobile navigation | 92 | Lighthouse |
### Critical issues (X found)
- **[Category]** Issue description. File: `path/to/file.js:123`
- **Impact:** Why this matters
- **Evidence:** Measured failure, runtime observation, or source hypothesis
- **Fix:** Specific code change or recommendation
### High priority (X found)
...
### Summary
- Performance: measured status and X findings
- Accessibility: automated status, X findings, manual checks pending/passed
- SEO: X findings
- Best Practices: X findings
- Agentic Browsing: X findings or not available
### Recommended priority
1. First fix this because...
2. Then address...
3. Finally optimize...
### Verification
- Re-run results under the same conditions
- Manual checks completed
- Field validation still pendingQuick checklist
Before every deploy
- Core Web Vitals passing
- No accessibility errors (axe/Lighthouse)
- No console errors
- HTTPS working
- Meta tags present
Weekly review
- Check Search Console for issues
- Review Core Web Vitals trends
- Update dependencies
- Test with screen reader
Monthly deep dive
- Full Lighthouse audit
- Performance profiling
- Accessibility audit with real users
- SEO keyword review
References
For detailed guidelines on specific areas:
- Performance Optimization
- Core Web Vitals
- Accessibility
- SEO
- Best Practices
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

