web-quality-audit
Skill1 starsChanged 6 days agoUnlicenseView on GitHub
Comprehensive web quality audit covering performance, accessibility, SEO, and best practices. Use when asked to "audit my site", "review web quality", "run lighthouse audit", "check page quality", or "optimize my website".
21 other projects use a version of this, 17 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- Mahesh-Bishnoi/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- its-ash/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- xuweizhengo/skills-hubedited, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- damacus/agent-skillsedited, first seen Oct 29, 2026
- viasrijan/crazy-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- arkantrust/next-skillsedited, first seen Oct 20, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use vercel-optimize, clean-code and 7 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
VercelSkillvercel-optimize
Use for Vercel cost and performance optimization on deployed projects, especially Next.js, SvelteKit, Nuxt, and limited Astro apps. Collect Vercel metrics, usage, project config, and code scan results first; investigate only metric-backed candidates; produce ranked recommendations grounded in verified files and version-aware Vercel/framework docs. Trigger for Vercel bill reduction, slow or expensive routes, caching opportunities, Function Invocations, Build Minutes, Fast Data Transfer, Core Web Vitals, Bot Management, Fluid compute, or cost breakdown requests.
Also in 3 projects that use this
xenitV1Skillclean-code
Pragmatic coding standards - concise, direct, no over-engineering, no unnecessary comments
Also in 4 projects that use this
LesaniSkillwriting-beats
Shape an article as a journey of beats, choose-your-own-adventure style. The user picks a starting beat from the raw material, you write only that beat, then offer options for where to pivot next, beat by beat, until the article reaches a natural end. Use when the user has raw material and wants to assemble it as a narrative rather than an argument.
Also in 3 projects that use this
CloudflareSkillreceiving-code-review
Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation
Also in 4 projects that use this
OpenAISkillexecuting-plans
Use when you have a written implementation plan to execute in a separate session with review checkpoints
Also in 4 projects that use this
OpenAISkillsubagent-driven-development
Use when executing implementation plans with independent tasks in the current session
Also in 4 projects that use this
- +2 more from openai
Other versions21 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 17
- midudev/preguntas-entrevista-react★ 7.8k97% same
- MiladJoodi/skills★ 2447% same
- PracticalSwan/agent-skills★ 2237% same
- RodrigoTomeES/getmcp★ 1397% same
- xuweizhengo/skills-hub★ 448% same
- neronain/ClaudeSkills-Neronain★ 398% same
- damacus/agent-skills★ 248% same
- miptah21/skills★ 296% same
- Manuekle/Forge★ 198% same
- vaibhav-deveree/skill-awesome★ 198% same
7 more not listed
Wrote their own version · 4
- markoblogo/abvx-agent-skills★ 16same name
- Mahesh-Bishnoi/skills★ 2same name
- its-ash/skills★ 0same name
- viasrijan/crazy-skills★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository76 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- ad-copy-writerSkill
- ae-inspect-describeSkill
- algorithmic-artSkill
- animation-directorSkill
- assembly-guideSkill
- brainstorming-and-ideatingSkill
- brainstorming-research-ideasSkill
- brainstormingSkill
- brief-to-tasksSkill
- canvas-designSkill
- cli-designSkill
- cli-output-hierarchySkill
- commit-messageSkill
- craft-uiSkill
- creative-directorSkill
- design-briefSkill
- design-flowSkill
- design-mock-auditSkill
- design-reviewSkill
- design-system-patternsSkill
- design-tokensSkill
- deslopifySkill
- diagnoseSkill
- diagramming-app-routesSkill
- doc-restructureSkill
- eval-criticSkill
- formatting-open-markdownsSkill
- frontend-designSkill
- frontend-slidesSkill
- gdocs-tab-writerSkill
- gemini-apiSkill
- gif-creationSkill
- github_repo_researchSkill
- grill-meSkill
- grill-with-docsSkill
- hallmarkSkill
- handoffSkill
- html-presentationSkill
- humanizerSkill
- i-have-adhdSkill
- improve-codebase-architectureSkill
- information-architectureSkill
- install-skill-from-githubSkill
- markdown-output-hierarchySkill
- marketing-psychologySkill
- merge-latestSkill
- modern-web-performanceSkill
- motion-designSkill
- pdf-readerSkill
- pm-brainstormingSkill
- pm-discovery-brainstormSkill
- product-marketingSkill
- prototypeSkill
- pull-requestSkill
- ralph_loopSkill
- react-best-practicesSkill
- review-loopSkill
- sandbox-explainerSkill
- skill-creatorSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
16 rules. 11 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.
11
Common
Most of the 21 edited versions we read keep these.
0
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
5
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 33
Compress images: Use WebP/AVIF with fallbacks.
- Common: line 34
Minimize JavaScript: Remove unused code. Use code splitting.
- Very specific: line 36
Efficient fonts: Use font-display: swap. Preload critical fonts.
- Very specific: line 39
Preconnect to origins: Add <link rel="preconnect"> for third-party domains.
- Very specific: line 47
Text alternatives: Every <img> has meaningful alt text.
- Common: line 49
Don't rely on color alone: Use icons, patterns, or text alongside color indicators.
- Common: line 53
Keyboard accessible: All functionality available via keyboard.
- Common: line 62
Labels and instructions: All form inputs have associated labels.
- Common: line 65
Valid HTML: No duplicate IDs. Properly nested elements.
- Common: line 66
ARIA used correctly: Prefer native elements. ARIA roles match behavior.
- Common: line 75
No noindex on important pages: Check meta robots and headers.
- Common: line 92
HTTPS everywhere: No mixed content. HSTS enabled.
- Common: line 93
No vulnerable libraries: Keep dependencies updated.
- Very specific: line 99
Valid doctype: Use <!DOCTYPE html>.
- Common: line 105
Clear permission requests: Only ask when needed, with context.
- Common: line 119
When performing an audit, structure findings as:
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 21 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Web quality audit
Comprehensive quality review based on Google Lighthouse audits. Covers Performance, Accessibility, SEO, and Best Practices across 150+ checks.
Lighthouse v13 note (Oct 2025+). Lighthouse has migrated the Performance category from per-opportunity audits to Performance Insight Audits (announcement). Several individual audit names this skill historically referenced — First Meaningful Paint, No Document Write, Uses Passive Event Listeners, Uses Rel Preload — have been removed or merged. The underlying advice is unchanged and still applies; only the report format moved. The CLS-related audits ("layout shifts", "non-composited animations", "unsized images") are now consolidated into a single
cls-culprits-insight, and image audits are merged intoimage-delivery-insight. Treat older Lighthouse JSON output as a superset, not a contradiction.
How it works
- Analyze the provided code/project for quality issues
- Categorize findings by severity (Critical, High, Medium, Low)
- Provide specific, actionable recommendations
- Include code examples for fixes
Audit categories
Performance (40% of typical issues)
Core Web Vitals — Must pass for good page experience:
- LCP (Largest Contentful Paint) < 2.5s. The largest visible element must render quickly. Optimize images, fonts, and server response time.
- INP (Interaction to Next Paint) < 200ms. User interactions must feel instant. Reduce JavaScript execution time and break up long tasks.
- CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift) < 0.1. Content must not jump around. Set explicit dimensions on images, embeds, and ads.
Resource Optimization:
- Compress images. Use WebP/AVIF with fallbacks. Serve correctly sized images via
srcset. - Minimize JavaScript. Remove unused code. Use code splitting. Defer non-critical scripts.
- Optimize CSS. Extract critical CSS. Remove unused styles. Avoid
@import. - Efficient fonts. Use
font-display: swap. Preload critical fonts. Subset to needed characters.
Loading Strategy:
- Preconnect to origins. Add
<link rel="preconnect">for third-party domains. - Preload critical assets. LCP images, fonts, and above-fold CSS.
- Lazy load below-fold content. Images, iframes, and heavy components.
- Cache effectively. Long cache TTLs for static assets. Immutable caching for hashed files.
Accessibility (30% of typical issues)
Perceivable:
- Text alternatives. Every
<img>has meaningfulalttext. Decorative images usealt="". - Color contrast. Minimum 4.5:1 for normal text, 3:1 for large text (WCAG AA).
- Don't rely on color alone. Use icons, patterns, or text alongside color indicators.
- Captions and transcripts. Video has captions. Audio has transcripts.
Operable:
- Keyboard accessible. All functionality available via keyboard. No keyboard traps.
- Focus visible. Clear focus indicators on all interactive elements.
- Skip links. Provide "Skip to main content" for keyboard users.
- Sufficient time. Users can extend time limits. No auto-advancing content without controls.
Understandable:
- Page language. Set
langattribute on<html>. - Consistent navigation. Same navigation structure across pages.
- Error identification. Form errors clearly described and associated with fields.
- Labels and instructions. All form inputs have associated labels.
Robust:
- Valid HTML. No duplicate IDs. Properly nested elements.
- ARIA used correctly. Prefer native elements. ARIA roles match behavior.
- Name, role, value. Interactive elements have accessible names and correct roles.
SEO (15% of typical issues)
Crawlability:
- Valid robots.txt. Doesn't block important resources.
- XML sitemap. Lists all important pages. Submitted to Search Console.
- Canonical URLs. Prevent duplicate content issues.
- No noindex on important pages. Check meta robots and headers.
On-Page SEO:
- Unique title tags. 50-60 characters. Primary keyword included.
- Meta descriptions. 150-160 characters. Compelling and unique.
- Heading hierarchy. Single
<h1>. Logical heading structure. - Descriptive link text. Not "click here" or "read more".
Technical SEO:
- Mobile-friendly. Responsive design. Tap targets ≥ 48px.
- HTTPS. Secure connection required.
- Fast loading. Performance directly impacts ranking.
- Structured data. JSON-LD for rich snippets (Article, Product, FAQ, etc.).
Best practices (15% of typical issues)
Security:
- HTTPS everywhere. No mixed content. HSTS enabled.
- No vulnerable libraries. Keep dependencies updated.
- CSP headers. Content Security Policy to prevent XSS.
- No exposed source maps. In production builds.
Modern Standards:
- No deprecated APIs. Replace
document.write, synchronous XHR, etc. - Valid doctype. Use
<!DOCTYPE html>. - Charset declared.
<meta charset="UTF-8">as first element in<head>. - No browser errors. Clean console. No CORS issues.
UX Patterns:
- No intrusive interstitials. Especially on mobile.
- Clear permission requests. Only ask when needed, with context.
- No misleading buttons. Buttons do what they say.
Severity levels
| Level | Description | Action |
| Critical | Security vulnerabilities, complete failures | Fix immediately |
| High | Core Web Vitals failures, major a11y barriers | Fix before launch |
| Medium | Performance opportunities, SEO improvements | Fix within sprint |
| Low | Minor optimizations, code quality | Fix when convenient |
Audit output format
When performing an audit, structure findings as:
## Audit results
### Critical issues (X found)
- **[Category]** Issue description. File: `path/to/file.js:123`
- **Impact:** Why this matters
- **Fix:** Specific code change or recommendation
### High priority (X found)
...
### Summary
- Performance: X issues (Y critical)
- Accessibility: X issues (Y critical)
- SEO: X issues
- Best Practices: X issues
### Recommended priority
1. First fix this because...
2. Then address...
3. Finally optimize...Quick checklist
Before every deploy
- Core Web Vitals passing
- No accessibility errors (axe/Lighthouse)
- No console errors
- HTTPS working
- Meta tags present
Weekly review
- Check Search Console for issues
- Review Core Web Vitals trends
- Update dependencies
- Test with screen reader
Monthly deep dive
- Full Lighthouse audit
- Performance profiling
- Accessibility audit with real users
- SEO keyword review
References
For detailed guidelines on specific areas:
- Performance Optimization
- Core Web Vitals
- Accessibility
- SEO
- Best Practices
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
Reviews can't be read right now.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

