agentleFS
swsounds42swsounds42/claude-dotfiles/skills/cdt-a11y-debugging/SKILL.md

cdt-a11y-debugging

Skill0 starsChanged 41 days agoMITView on GitHub

Uses Chrome DevTools MCP for accessibility (a11y) debugging and auditing based on web.dev guidelines. Use when testing semantic HTML, ARIA labels, focus states, keyboard navigation, tap targets, and color contrast.

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

19 rules. About 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 14 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈5

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 14

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Reading web.dev documentation: If you need to research specific accessibility guidelines (like …

    line 14
  2. Distinctive:

    Start by running a Lighthouse accessibility audit to get a comprehensive baseline.

    line 20
  3. Very specific:

    Check scores (0-1 scale). A score < 1 indicates violations.

    line 26
  4. Very specific:

    Parsing: Do not read the entire file line-by-line.

    line 29
  5. Very specific:

    Use take_snapshot to capture the accessibility tree.

    line 50
  6. Very specific:

    Check Heading Levels: Ensure heading levels (h1, h2, h3, etc.) are logical and do not skip levels.

    line 51
  7. Distinctive:

    Content Reordering: Verify that the DOM order (which drives the accessibility tree) matches the visual reading order.

    line 52
  8. Very specific:

    Ensure interactive elements have an accessible name (e.g., a button should not just say "" if it only contains an icon).

    line 57
  9. Very specific:

    Orphaned Inputs: Verify that all form inputs have associated labels.

    line 58
  10. Very specific:

    Check images for alt text.

    line 59
  11. Very specific:

    Use the press_key tool with "Tab" or "Shift+Tab" to move focus.

    line 65
  12. Very specific:

    Use take_snapshot to capture the updated accessibility tree.

    line 66
  13. Distinctive:

    If a modal opens, focus must move into the modal and "trap" within it until closed.

    line 68
  14. Very specific:

    Call list_console_messages with types: ["issue"].

    line 80
  15. Distinctive:

    Look for "Low Contrast" issues in the output.

    line 81
  16. Very specific:

    If native audits do not report issues (which may happen in some headless environments) or if you need to check a specific element manually, …

    line 83
  17. Distinctive:

    Verify document-level accessibility settings often missed in component testing using the "Global Page Checks" snippet found in …

    line 87
  18. Very specific:

    If standard a11y queries fail or the evaluate_script snippets return unexpected results:

    line 91
  19. Very specific:

    Visual Inspection: If automated scripts cannot determine contrast (e.g., text over gradient images or complex backgrounds), use …

    line 93

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md
<!-- Modified from ChromeDevTools/chrome-devtools-mcp (tag chrome-devtools-mcp-v1.10.1, skills/a11y-debugging): frontmatter name changed from "a11y-debugging" to "cdt-a11y-debugging" for local vendoring. No other changes. -->

Core Concepts

Page Targeting: Page-scoped tools (take_snapshot, list_console_messages, evaluate_script, press_key, take_screenshot, lighthouse_audit, etc.) require a pageId parameter. Retrieve available page IDs using list_pages or from new_page.

Accessibility Tree vs DOM: Visually hiding an element (e.g., CSS opacity: 0) behaves differently for screen readers than display: none or aria-hidden="true". The take_snapshot tool returns the accessibility tree of the page, which represents what assistive technologies "see", making it the most reliable source of truth for semantic structure.

Reading web.dev documentation: If you need to research specific accessibility guidelines (like https://web.dev/articles/accessible-tap-targets), you can append .md.txt to the URL (e.g., https://web.dev/articles/accessible-tap-targets.md.txt) to fetch the clean, raw markdown version. This is much easier to read!

Workflow Patterns

1. Automated Audit (Lighthouse)

Start by running a Lighthouse accessibility audit to get a comprehensive baseline. This tool provides a high-level score and lists specific failing elements with remediation advice.

  1. Run the audit:
    • Set mode to "navigation" to refresh the page and capture load issues.
    • Set outputDirPath (e.g., /tmp/lh-report) to save the full JSON report.
  2. Analyze the Summary:
    • Check scores (0-1 scale). A score < 1 indicates violations.
    • Review audits.failed count.
  3. Review the Report (CRITICAL):
    • Parsing: Do not read the entire file line-by-line. Use a CLI tool like jq or a Node.js one-liner to filter for failures:
      # Extract failing audits with their details
      node -e "const r=require('./report.json'); Object.values(r.audits).filter(a=>a.score!==null && a.score<1).forEach(a=>console.log(JSON.stringify({id:a.id, title:a.title, items:a.details?.items})))"
    • This efficiently extracts the selector and snippet of failing elements without loading the full report into context.

2. Browser Issues & Audits

Chrome automatically checks for common accessibility problems. Use list_console_messages to check for these native audits:

  • types: ["issue"]
  • includePreservedMessages: true (to catch issues that occurred during page load)

This often reveals missing labels, invalid ARIA attributes, and other critical errors without manual investigation.

3. Semantics & Structure

The accessibility tree exposes the heading hierarchy and semantic landmarks.

  1. Navigate to the page.
  2. Use take_snapshot to capture the accessibility tree.
  3. Check Heading Levels: Ensure heading levels (h1, h2, h3, etc.) are logical and do not skip levels. The snapshot will include heading roles.
  4. Content Reordering: Verify that the DOM order (which drives the accessibility tree) matches the visual reading order. Use take_screenshot to inspect the visual layout and compare it against the snapshot structure to catch CSS floats or absolute positioning that jumbles the logical flow.

4. Labels, Forms & Text Alternatives

  1. Locate buttons, inputs, and images in the take_snapshot output.
  2. Ensure interactive elements have an accessible name (e.g., a button should not just say "" if it only contains an icon).
  3. Orphaned Inputs: Verify that all form inputs have associated labels. Use evaluate_script with the "Find Orphaned Form Inputs" snippet found in references/a11y-snippets.md.
  4. Check images for alt text.

5. Focus & Keyboard Navigation

Testing "keyboard traps" and proper focus management without visual feedback relies on tracking the focused element.

  1. Use the press_key tool with "Tab" or "Shift+Tab" to move focus.
  2. Use take_snapshot to capture the updated accessibility tree.
  3. Locate the element marked as focused in the snapshot to verify focus moved to the expected interactive element.
  4. If a modal opens, focus must move into the modal and "trap" within it until closed.

6. Tap Targets and Visuals

According to web.dev, tap targets should be at least 48x48 pixels with sufficient spacing. Since the accessibility tree doesn't show sizes, use evaluate_script with the "Measure Tap Target Size" snippet found in references/a11y-snippets.md.

Pass the element's uid from the snapshot as an argument to evaluate_script.

7. Color Contrast

To verify color contrast ratios, start by checking for native accessibility issues:

  1. Call list_console_messages with types: ["issue"].
  2. Look for "Low Contrast" issues in the output.

If native audits do not report issues (which may happen in some headless environments) or if you need to check a specific element manually, use evaluate_script with the "Check Color Contrast" snippet found in references/a11y-snippets.md.

8. Global Page Checks

Verify document-level accessibility settings often missed in component testing using the "Global Page Checks" snippet found in references/a11y-snippets.md.

Troubleshooting

If standard a11y queries fail or the evaluate_script snippets return unexpected results:

  • Visual Inspection: If automated scripts cannot determine contrast (e.g., text over gradient images or complex backgrounds), use take_screenshot to capture the element. While models cannot measure exact contrast ratios from images, they can visually assess legibility and identify obvious issues.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.