agentleFS
swsounds42swsounds42/claude-dotfiles/skills/cdt-debug-optimize-lcp/SKILL.md

cdt-debug-optimize-lcp

Skill0 starsChanged 41 days agoMITView on GitHub

Guides debugging and optimizing Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) using Chrome DevTools MCP tools. Use this skill whenever the user asks about LCP performance, slow page loads, Core Web Vitals optimization, or wants to understand why their page's main content takes too long to appear. Also use when the user mentions "largest contentful paint", "page load speed", "CWV", or wants to improve how fast their hero image or main content renders.

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

16 rules. About 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 11 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈5

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 11

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Every page's LCP breaks down into four sequential subparts with no gaps or overlaps.

    line 20
  2. Distinctive:

    Follow these steps in order.

    line 35
  3. Very specific:

    Use performance_analyze_insight to drill into LCP-specific insights.

    line 48
  4. Very specific:

    Call performance_analyze_insight with pageId, the insight set ID, and the insight name from the trace results.

    line 55
  5. Very specific:

    Use evaluate_script (with pageId) and the "Identify LCP Element" snippet found in references/lcp-snippets.md to reveal the LCP element's …

    line 59
  6. Very specific:

    Use list_network_requests to see when the LCP resource loaded relative to other resources:

    line 65
  7. Very specific:

    Call list_network_requests with pageId filtered by resourceTypes: ["Image", "Font"] (adjust based on Step 3).

    line 67
  8. Very specific:

    Use evaluate_script (with pageId) and the "Audit Common Issues" snippet found in references/lcp-snippets.md to check for lazy-loaded images …

    line 77
  9. Distinctive:

    After identifying the bottleneck subpart, apply these prioritized fixes.

    line 81
  10. Very specific:

    Fix: Use standard <img> with src.

    line 88
  11. Very specific:

    Fix: Add <link rel="preload" fetchpriority="high"> if the image isn't discoverable in HTML.

    line 89
  12. Very specific:

    Fix: Add fetchpriority="high" to the LCP <img> tag.

    line 90
  13. Distinctive:

    Fix: Use Server-Side Rendering (SSR) so the element exists in initial HTML.

    line 99
  14. Very specific:

    Fix: Use modern formats (WebP, AVIF) and responsive images (srcset).

    line 105
  15. Very specific:

    Fix: Use font-display: swap if LCP is text blocked by a web font.

    line 108
  16. Distinctive:

    Fix: Ensure pages are eligible for back/forward cache (bfcache).

    line 116

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md
<!-- Modified from ChromeDevTools/chrome-devtools-mcp (tag chrome-devtools-mcp-v1.10.1, skills/debug-optimize-lcp): frontmatter name changed from "debug-optimize-lcp" to "cdt-debug-optimize-lcp" for local vendoring. No other changes. -->

What is LCP and why it matters

Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) measures how quickly a page's main content becomes visible. It's the time from navigation start until the largest image or text block renders in the viewport.

  • Good: 2.5 seconds or less
  • Needs improvement: 2.5–4.0 seconds
  • Poor: greater than 4.0 seconds

LCP is a Core Web Vital that directly affects user experience and search ranking. On 73% of mobile pages, the LCP element is an image.

LCP Subparts Breakdown

Every page's LCP breaks down into four sequential subparts with no gaps or overlaps. Understanding which subpart is the bottleneck is the key to effective optimization.

SubpartIdeal % of LCPWhat it measures
Time to First Byte (TTFB)~40%Navigation start → first byte of HTML received
Resource load delay<10%TTFB → browser starts loading the LCP resource
Resource load duration~40%Time to download the LCP resource
Element render delay<10%LCP resource downloaded → LCP element rendered

The "delay" subparts should be as close to zero as possible. If either delay subpart is large relative to the total LCP, that's the first place to optimize.

Common Pitfall: Optimizing one subpart (like compressing an image to reduce load duration) without checking others. If render delay is the real bottleneck, a smaller image won't help — the saved time just shifts to render delay.

Debugging Workflow

Follow these steps in order. Each step builds on the previous one.

Step 1: Record a Performance Trace

Navigate to the page, then record a trace with reload to capture the full page load including LCP:

  1. navigate_page with pageId to the target URL.
  2. performance_start_trace with pageId, reload: true and autoStop: true.

The trace results will include LCP timing and available insight sets. Note the insight set IDs from the output — you'll need them in the next step.

Step 2: Analyze LCP Insights

Use performance_analyze_insight to drill into LCP-specific insights. Look for these insight names in the trace results:

  • LCPBreakdown — Shows the four LCP subparts with timing for each.
  • DocumentLatency — Server response time issues affecting TTFB.
  • RenderBlocking — Resources blocking the LCP element from rendering.
  • LCPDiscovery — Whether the LCP resource was discoverable early.

Call performance_analyze_insight with pageId, the insight set ID, and the insight name from the trace results.

Step 3: Identify the LCP Element

Use evaluate_script (with pageId) and the "Identify LCP Element" snippet found in references/lcp-snippets.md to reveal the LCP element's tag, resource URL, and raw timing data.

The url field tells you what resource to look for in the network waterfall. If url is empty, the LCP element is text-based (no resource to load).

Step 4: Check the Network Waterfall

Use list_network_requests to see when the LCP resource loaded relative to other resources:

  • Call list_network_requests with pageId filtered by resourceTypes: ["Image", "Font"] (adjust based on Step 3).
  • Then use get_network_request with pageId and the LCP resource's request ID for full details.

Key Checks:

  • Start Time: Compare against the HTML document and the first resource. If the LCP resource starts much later than the first resource, there's resource load delay to eliminate.
  • Duration: A large resource load duration suggests the file is too big or the server is slow.

Step 5: Inspect HTML for Common Issues

Use evaluate_script (with pageId) and the "Audit Common Issues" snippet found in references/lcp-snippets.md to check for lazy-loaded images in the viewport, missing fetchpriority, and render-blocking scripts.

Optimization Strategies

After identifying the bottleneck subpart, apply these prioritized fixes.

1. Eliminate Resource Load Delay (target: <10%)

The most common bottleneck. The LCP resource should start loading immediately.

  • Root Cause: LCP image loaded via JS/CSS, data-src usage, or loading="lazy".
  • Fix: Use standard <img> with src. Never lazy-load the LCP image.
  • Fix: Add <link rel="preload" fetchpriority="high"> if the image isn't discoverable in HTML.
  • Fix: Add fetchpriority="high" to the LCP <img> tag.

2. Eliminate Element Render Delay (target: <10%)

The element should render immediately after loading.

  • Root Cause: Large stylesheets, synchronous scripts in <head>, or main thread blocking.
  • Fix: Inline critical CSS, defer non-critical CSS/JS.
  • Fix: Break up long tasks blocking the main thread.
  • Fix: Use Server-Side Rendering (SSR) so the element exists in initial HTML.

3. Reduce Resource Load Duration (target: ~40%)

Make the resource smaller or faster to deliver.

  • Fix: Use modern formats (WebP, AVIF) and responsive images (srcset).
  • Fix: Serve from a CDN.
  • Fix: Set Cache-Control headers.
  • Fix: Use font-display: swap if LCP is text blocked by a web font.

4. Reduce TTFB (target: ~40%)

The HTML document itself takes too long to arrive.

  • Fix: Minimize redirects and optimize server response time.
  • Fix: Cache HTML at the edge (CDN).
  • Fix: Ensure pages are eligible for back/forward cache (bfcache).

Verifying Fixes & Emulation

  • Verification: Re-run the trace (performance_start_trace with pageId and reload: true) and compare the new subpart breakdown. The bottleneck should shrink.
  • Emulation: Lab measurements differ from real-world experience. Use emulate to test under constraints:
    • emulate with pageId, networkConditions: "Fast 3G" and cpuThrottlingRate: 4.
    • This surfaces issues visible only on slower connections/devices.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.