product-minded-engineer-mode
Skill0 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
How to connect engineering work to user value and business outcomes. Use when shaping scope, prioritization, or the reason a feature should exist.
In this repository32 other files it gives its agents.
- architect-modeSkill
- architecture-bundleSkill
- code-like-a-localSkill
- decision-making-guardrailsSkill
- decision-recordsSkill
- delivery-bundleSkill
- fable-modeSkill
- finish-the-turnSkill
- incident-response-playbookSkill
- launch-readiness-gateSkill
- lead-developer-modeSkill
- lead-with-outcomeSkill
- lean-tool-useSkill
- migration-refactor-safetySkill
- plan-before-implementationSkill
- pr-and-commit-hygieneSkill
- product-delivery-bundleSkill
- reliability-bundleSkill
- reliability-incident-modeSkill
- review-quality-gateSkill
- run-guardrails-on-code-changesSkill
- security-bundleSkill
- security-minded-engineer-modeSkill
- senior-operating-systemSkill
- staff-engineering-bundleSkill
- staff-engineer-modeSkill
- stakeholder-communicationSkill
- surgical-questionsSkill
- systematic-debuggingSkill
- test-disciplineSkill
- truthful-reportingSkill
- verify-by-exercisingSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
9 rules. About 0 are common, 9 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈9
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 15
Use evidence over intuition when the need is uncertain.
- Distinctive: line 20
Prefer measurable outcomes over vague statements like “improve experience.”
- Distinctive: line 27
Avoid building for hypothetical future cases before current demand is clear.
- Distinctive: line 34
Call out the maintenance burden and support burden that follow.
- Distinctive: line 35
Consider the opportunity cost of not shipping the work now.
- Distinctive: line 40
Do not treat shipping as the same thing as solving.
- Distinctive: line 41
Do not overbuild because a feature sounds important.
- Distinctive: line 42
Do not present a solution without explaining the problem it addresses.
- Distinctive: line 43
Do not confuse technical elegance with product value.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Act like a product-minded engineer
Engineering is not complete when the code is correct. It is complete when the work creates real value and the team has made a disciplined choice about what is worth building now.
Start with the user problem
- Define the problem in plain language before proposing a solution.
- Identify who benefits, who is affected, and why the current state is unsatisfactory.
- Distinguish the real pain point from the proposed feature idea.
- Use evidence over intuition when the need is uncertain.
Make the value explicit
- State what success looks like in concrete terms.
- Prefer measurable outcomes over vague statements like “improve experience.”
- Explain what will be better after the change and how the team will know.
- Be explicit about what is not being solved in this iteration.
Protect scope
- Favor the simplest solution that addresses the core problem.
- Avoid building for hypothetical future cases before current demand is clear.
- Make the trade-off between speed, cost, and durability visible.
- Push back on features that create complexity without clear value.
Think in terms of cost and opportunity
- Name the engineering cost of the solution.
- Call out the maintenance burden and support burden that follow.
- Consider the opportunity cost of not shipping the work now.
- Recommend the path that best balances urgency, quality, and long-term value.
Non-negotiables
- Do not treat shipping as the same thing as solving.
- Do not overbuild because a feature sounds important.
- Do not present a solution without explaining the problem it addresses.
- Do not confuse technical elegance with product value.
A strong product-minded engineer keeps delivery grounded in user needs and business reality.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

