agentleFS
sukirman1901sukirman1901/frontend-expert/skills/content-design/SKILL.md

content-design

Skill9 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub

Write and repair UI copy: labels, CTAs, errors, empty states, confirmations, onboarding, product voice, localization-ready strings, and AI-sounding prose. Trigger for “copy terasa AI”, “tulisan AI”, “pesan error”, “teks tombol”, “empty state”, “tulisan generik”, or docs/changelog that read like filler. Visual slop stays on anti-slop-design; this skill owns words.

6 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

Files
SKILL.md

Content Design

Overview

Copy helps someone understand, act, and recover. Product facts beat generic enthusiasm. AI-sounding prose is a content defect, not a separate pack domain.

When to use

  • Labels, buttons, help, empty/error/success, confirmations, onboarding
  • “Tulisan AI” / copy that sounds generated
  • Terminology, voice, or localization-ready strings
  • README, changelog, docs, or marketing sentences that read like filler

When to skip

  • Visual rendering, wrapping, truncation → design-typography
  • Validation mechanics → forms
  • Landing section stack / IA → marketing
  • Purple/gradients/Lorem-as-layout → anti-slop-design (then replace Lorem here)
  • Generated hooks/any/empty wrappers → anti-slop-code

MUST

RuleDetail
Preserve factsNever invent capabilities, metrics, quotes, logos, or guarantees
Unknown ≠ fictionIf retry, reversibility, or scope is unknown, ask or say so
Action-ledButtons name the action; errors name what happened and the next step
Consequence-firstDestructive copy names object, outcome, and whether it can be undone
One termOne concept keeps one name across the flow
Localization-readyWhole sentences; no concatenated fragments; don’t depend on layout direction
Before/afterReview work shows concrete rewrites, not vibe notes

AI-writing scan

PatternFix
Unlock / elevate / seamless / next-genName the actual job
“Something went wrong.”What failed + retained state + recovery
“Are you sure?”Named object + consequence
Stacked adjectivesOne concrete noun phrase
Fake metrics or testimonialsDelete, or use a real sourced fact
Throat-clearing introsStart at the action
Repeated summary conclusionsCut the echo

Workflow

  1. Inventory — audience, task, known facts, terms, tone, states.
  2. Scan — hype, missing recovery, inconsistency, translation risk.
  3. Rewrite — meaning, action, consequence, or recovery first.
  4. Fit — realistic length and expansion; don’t truncate away meaning.
  5. Verify — before/after; no invented facts; flow still complete.

Boundaries

  • May decide: concise wording in the product’s existing voice.
  • Must not: fabricate proof, hide consequences, or treat visual truncation as a copy fix.

Checklist

  • Facts inventoried; unknowns labeled
  • CTA / error / empty / destructive copy is specific
  • AI-writing scan clean
  • Before/after shown for review work
  • Strings survive expansion

Depth

Full guide: references/content-design.md. Visual slop catalog: references/anti-patterns.md.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.