haos-source-quality-auditor
Skill1 starsChanged 50 days agoMITView on GitHub
Audit source quality for HAOS research. Use when evaluating web pages, papers, reports, news, market data, regulatory sources, competitor claims, or any research source before trusting it.
In this repository24 other files it gives its agents.
- copywritingSkill
- design-principlesSkill
- haos-auditoria-masterSkill
- haos-claim-verificationSkill
- haos-deep-researchSkill
- haos-execution-wavesSkill
- haos-handoff-artefatoSkill
- haos-memory-provenanceSkill
- haos-memory-tripleSkill
- haos-model-routerSkill
- haos-multi-agent-reviewSkill
- haos-project-sanitationSkill
- haos-quality-gatesSkill
- haos-query-expansionSkill
- haos-research-report-writerSkill
- haos-structural-refactorSkill
- long-running-agentSkill
- servidor-compartilhadoSkill
- session-handoffSkill
- skill-creatorSkill
- software-architectureSkill
- software-engineerSkill
- token-optimizerSkill
- unit-economicsSkill
The file
Files
HAOS Source Quality Auditor
Classificar confiabilidade antes de usar fonte como evidencia.
Score
Dar nota A, B, C, D ou X:
A: fonte primaria/oficial, paper revisado, dado bruto, documento legal, metodologia clara.B: fonte secundaria confiavel, relatorio reconhecido, jornalismo com autoria e fontes.C: blog/artigo util, mas com vies, pouca metodologia ou dado de segunda mao.D: opiniao, venda, conteudo sem autoria/data, fonte fraca.X: fonte inadequada, suspeita, privada, sem acesso, potencialmente fraudulenta ou perigosa.
Criterios
- autoria e autoridade;
- data e atualidade;
- metodologia;
- fonte primaria ou secundaria;
- conflito de interesse;
- possibilidade de verificacao independente;
- jurisdicao/escopo;
- estabilidade temporal;
- risco de SEO spam ou afiliado;
- risco de cherry-picking.
Formato
| Fonte | Tipo | Data | Score | Pode sustentar claim? | Observacao |
|---|---|---:|---|---|---|
| ... | oficial | 2026-05-25 | A | sim | ... |Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.