triage
Skill4 starsChanged 15 days agoMITView on GitHub
Triage Work Tracker requests and external Review Proposals into agent-ready briefs.
189 other projects use a version of this, 75 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- udecode/platetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- vercel-labs/add-skilltheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- chrysogonus/power-agentsedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- ishandutta2007/Awesome-Claude-Skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Adelie-Squad/solosquadtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- cloudflare/vinexttheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use writing-beats, setup-matt-pocock-skills and 9 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
LesaniSkillwriting-beats
Shape an article as a journey of beats, choose-your-own-adventure style. The user picks a starting beat from the raw material, you write only that beat, then offer options for where to pivot next, beat by beat, until the article reaches a natural end. Use when the user has raw material and wants to assemble it as a narrative rather than an argument.
Also in 66 projects that use this
GoogleSkillsetup-matt-pocock-skills
Configure this repo for the engineering skills — set up its issue tracker, triage label vocabulary, and domain doc layout. Run once before first use of the other engineering skills.
Also in 167 projects that use this
liufeng1976Skillsetup-ts-deep-modules
Wire dependency-cruiser into a TypeScript repo so each package is a deep module — implementation hidden in subfolders, reachable only through its entry-point files. User-invoked.
Also in 42 projects that use this
SethGammonSkillascii-diagram
Generate perfectly aligned ASCII diagrams — architecture, flow, sequence, box-and-arrow. Uses a programmatic character-grid approach so alignment is guaranteed by math, not token prediction. Includes post-render verification.
Also in 4 projects that use this
simo97Skillmigrate-to-shoehorn
Migrate test files from `as` type assertions to @total-typescript/shoehorn. Use when user mentions shoehorn, wants to replace `as` in tests, or needs partial test data.
Also in 68 projects that use this
LesaniSkillwriting-shape
Take a markdown file of raw material and shape it into an article through a conversational session — drafting candidate openings, growing the piece paragraph by paragraph, arguing about format (lists, tables, callouts, quotes) at each step. Use when the user has a pile of notes, fragments, or a rough draft and wants help turning it into something publishable.
Also in 63 projects that use this
- +1 more from Lesani
Other versions189 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 75
- mattpocock/skills★ 309k53% same
- QuivrHQ/quivr★ 40k53% same
- The-Vibe-Company/quivr★ 40k53% same
- GreyDGL/PentestGPT★ 16k55% same
- ArcReel/ArcReel★ 6.3k53% same
- vinvcn/mattpocock-skills-zh-CN★ 5.5k12% same
- withcoral/coral★ 4.9k53% same
- bestofjs/bestofjs★ 3.1k55% same
- CelestoAI/SmolVM★ 1.2k51% same
- moeru-ai/xsai★ 66753% same
65 more not listed
Wrote their own version · 114
- withastro/astro★ 64ksame name
- vectorize-io/hindsight★ 60ksame name
- ogulcancelik/herdr★ 47ksame name
- herdrdev/herdr★ 47ksame name
- colinhacks/zod★ 44ksame name
- vercel-labs/add-skill★ 39ksame name
- vercel-labs/skills★ 39ksame name
- pnpm/pnpm★ 37ksame name
- mlflow/mlflow★ 29ksame name
- PrefectHQ/fastmcp★ 28ksame name
104 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository31 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- ask-smittSkill
- change-walkthroughSkill
- closeoutSkill
- codebase-designSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- deliver-specSkill
- deliver-ticketSkill
- diagnosing-bugsSkill
- domain-modelingSkill
- grill-with-docsSkill
- implementSkill
- improve-codebase-architectureSkill
- prototypeSkill
- prSkill
- researchSkill
- resolving-merge-conflictsSkill
- review-feedbackSkill
- setup-federated-workflowSkill
- tddSkill
- to-specSkill
- to-ticketsSkill
- wayfinderSkill
- wizardSkill
- grillingSkill
- grill-meSkill
- handoffSkill
- teachSkill
- to-questionnaireSkill
- wait-whatSkill
- writing-for-agentsSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
9 rules. 0 are common, 8 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 176 edited versions we read keep these.
8
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 11
If this repository treats external Review Proposals as a request surface (see the Work Tracker binding), triage applies the same roles and …
- Distinctive: line 13
Every comment or request posted to the Work Tracker during triage must start with this disclaimer:
- Distinctive: line 21
Read AGENT-BRIEF.md when drafting or validating a brief.
- Distinctive: line 22
Read OUT-OF-SCOPE.md when matching or recording a rejected concept.
- Distinctive: line 41
Every triaged request should carry exactly one category role and one state role.
- Distinctive: line 76
Run both checks before completing context gathering:
- Very specific: line 78
Redundancy: Search the codebase for an existing implementation by domain concept, not just the request's wording, and report where you …
- Distinctive: line 79
Prior rejection: Run out-of-scope matching.
- Distinctive: line 129
If prior triage notes exist on the request or Review Proposal, read them, check whether the reporter has answered any outstanding …
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 176 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Triage
Move requests through a small state machine of triage roles. Read planning artifact contracts and Work Tracker context assembly before acting. Preserve standalone behavior when the configured Work Tracker or Domain Orientation bindings do not exist.
If this repository treats external Review Proposals as a request surface (see the Work Tracker binding), triage applies the same roles and states to those proposals, with the differences marked below. Resolve a bare #42 through the configured binding rather than Git-remote inference.
Every comment or request posted to the Work Tracker during triage must start with this disclaimer:
> *This was generated by AI during triage.*Reference docs
- Read AGENT-BRIEF.md when drafting or validating a brief.
- Read OUT-OF-SCOPE.md when matching or recording a rejected concept.
Roles
Two category roles:
bug— something is brokenenhancement— new feature or improvement
Five state roles:
needs-triage— maintainer needs to evaluateneeds-info— waiting on reporter for more informationready-for-agent— fully specified, ready for an AFK agentready-for-human— needs human implementationwontfix— will not be actioned
For a Review Proposal, the same states read against the attached code: ready-for-agent means a brief is attached and an agent should take the next step on the diff; ready-for-human means it's ready for a human to merge.
Every triaged request should carry exactly one category role and one state role. If state roles conflict, flag it and ask the maintainer before doing anything else.
These are canonical role names — the actual Routing Label strings used in the Work Tracker may differ. Use docs/agents/triage-labels.md when present; ask the maintainer to run the applicable setup skill if no mapping has been configured.
State transitions: an unlabeled request normally goes to needs-triage first; from there it moves to needs-info, ready-for-agent, ready-for-human, or wontfix. needs-info returns to needs-triage once the reporter replies. The maintainer can override at any time — flag transitions that look unusual and ask before proceeding.
Requests
Interpret the maintainer's natural-language request and act. Examples:
- "Show me anything that needs my attention"
- "Let's look at #42" (request or Review Proposal)
- "Move #42 to ready-for-agent"
- "What's ready for agents to pick up?"
Show what needs attention
Query the configured Work Tracker and present three buckets, oldest first:
- Unlabeled — never triaged.
needs-triage— evaluation in progress.needs-infowith reporter activity since the last triage notes — needs re-evaluation.
When Review Proposals are in scope, include external proposals in these buckets and tag each line [proposal] or [request]. Discovery surfaces only external proposals (the Work Tracker binding defines who counts as external) — a collaborator's in-flight proposal is not triage work. This filter is discovery-only; an explicitly named proposal is always triaged regardless of author.
Show counts and a one-line summary per item. Let the maintainer pick.
Triage a specific request or Review Proposal
Gather context. For Work Tracker delivery work, invoke the shared Context Assembly contract with the Ticket Origin Repository,
Delivery Context, and the exact request's permanent reference. Retain the returned file path unchanged. At this clarification boundary, use the diagnostics in anIncompletefile only to diagnose, reject, or repair the request. It may end inneeds-infoorwontfix, but it cannot enter an execution-ready state until a fresh post-brief assembly passes.Ambiguousstops for maintainer direction. Triage does not repeat provider reads outside the binding-directed assembly.For a Review Proposal, read its full body, comments, review state, and diff through the configured request surface. Resolve the exact authority under review through an explicit permanent reference and invoke shared Context Assembly for the contract-selected review profile. Follow any non-complete result at this triage boundary. Retain the selected profile and root for outcome validation.
Parse prior triage notes so you don't re-ask resolved questions. After the applicable Context Assembly gate, perform configured Domain Orientation before exploring canonical contexts, accepted Domain Model Deltas, ADRs, and code in the referenced repositories.
Run both checks before completing context gathering:
- Redundancy. Search the codebase for an existing implementation by domain concept, not just the request's wording, and report where you looked. If found, classify it as already-implemented
wontfixin step 5. - Prior rejection. Run out-of-scope matching.
- Redundancy. Search the codebase for an existing implementation by domain concept, not just the request's wording, and report where you looked. If found, classify it as already-implemented
- Recommend. Tell the maintainer your category and state recommendation with reasoning, plus a brief codebase summary relevant to the request — including whether it's already implemented. Wait for direction.
- Verify the claim. Before any grilling, check that the claim holds up. For a bug, reproduce it from the reporter's steps. For a Review Proposal, confirm the diff does what it claims — check it out, run the relevant tests or commands. Report what happened: confirmed (with code path), failed, or insufficient detail (a strong
needs-infosignal). A confirmed verification makes a much stronger agent brief. - Grill (if needed). If the request needs fleshing out, use the
grill-with-docsskill without granting canonical capture. Keep returned Domain Model Deltas in the current triage context. Before a cross-sessionneeds-infopause, move confirmed deltas into the established-so-far triage notes; beforeready-for-agent, move relevant deltas into the Agent Brief. - Apply the outcome:
ready-for-agent— post and validate an Agent Brief through AGENT-BRIEF.md, then finish by request surface:- For a Work Tracker request, invoke fresh shared Context Assembly for Delivery Context at that exact permanent reference after the complete Agent Brief is public. This new file must show that every material gap named by the initial
Incompleteresult is repaired. - For a Review Proposal, re-read the proposal and invoke fresh shared Context Assembly for the same selected profile and permanent authority root. Use Decision Context for a Decision Ticket or Specification and Delivery Context for delivered work.
Enforce the planning readiness invariant and apply the mapped Routing Label only when the selected branch's Context Assembly gate passes. A settled cross-repository or standalone request may go directly here; cross-repository scope alone does not require a Specification or Wayfinder Map.
- For a Work Tracker request, invoke fresh shared Context Assembly for Delivery Context at that exact permanent reference after the complete Agent Brief is public. This new file must show that every material gap named by the initial
ready-for-human— use the same request-surface profile validation and brief structure, then note why the work can't be delegated, such as judgment calls, external access, design decisions, or manual testing.needs-info— post triage notes (template below).wontfix— close, with the comment depending on why:- Already implemented — the change already exists in the codebase. Point to where it lives; do not write to
.out-of-scope/(that KB is for rejected requests, not built ones). - Rejected (bug) — polite explanation, then close.
- Rejected (enhancement) — write to
.out-of-scope/, link to it from a comment, then close (OUT-OF-SCOPE.md).
- Already implemented — the change already exists in the codebase. Point to where it lives; do not write to
needs-triage— apply the role. Optional comment if there's partial progress.
Requests with unresolved design or decomposition return to discovery or planning. Missing reporter facts use needs-info. Do not invent authority merely to make a request executable.
An execution-ready outcome is complete when the Agent Brief validates, the applicable Context Assembly gate passes at its retained selection, and the configured state role matches the outcome.
Quick state override
A maintainer's direct ready-for-agent request selects that outcome and skips step 4 only. It does not skip the initial diagnostic read, Agent Brief validation, or the post-brief Delivery Context rebuild. If settled information cannot repair the initial assembly diagnostics, use needs-info instead of applying ready-for-agent.
Needs-info template
## Triage Notes
**What we've established so far:**
- point 1
- point 2
**What we still need from you (@reporter):**
- question 1
- question 2Capture everything resolved during grilling under "established so far" so the work isn't lost. Questions must be specific and actionable, not "please provide more info".
Resuming a previous session
If prior triage notes exist on the request or Review Proposal, read them, check whether the reporter has answered any outstanding questions, and present an updated picture before continuing. Don't re-ask resolved questions.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

