domain-modeling
Skill4 starsChanged 15 days agoMITView on GitHub
Build and sharpen a project's domain model, returning complete Domain Model Deltas and applying them to canonical documentation when the invocation grants that authority. Use when discussing a codebase's ubiquitous language, assessing architecture decisions for documentation, writing or editing a CONTEXT.md, or recording or editing an ADR.
195 other projects use a version of this, 150 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- anorth/agent-skillsedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- chrysogonus/power-agentsedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- The-Vibe-Company/quivredited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- AJschoons/robowrightedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- tornikegomareli/Skillsedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- miklschmidt/archboardedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use setup-ts-deep-modules, decision-mapping and 7 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
liufeng1976Skillsetup-ts-deep-modules
Wire dependency-cruiser into a TypeScript repo so each package is a deep module — implementation hidden in subfolders, reachable only through its entry-point files. User-invoked.
Also in 43 projects that use this
FabienDehopreSkilldecision-mapping
Turn a loose idea into a sequenced map of investigation tickets, then drive them to resolution one at a time.
Also in 8 projects that use this
LesaniSkillwriting-beats
Shape an article as a journey of beats, choose-your-own-adventure style. The user picks a starting beat from the raw material, you write only that beat, then offer options for where to pivot next, beat by beat, until the article reaches a natural end. Use when the user has raw material and wants to assemble it as a narrative rather than an argument.
Also in 62 projects that use this
RoentekSkillloop-me
Grill me about specs for the workflows I want to build, within this workspace.
Also in 56 projects that use this
LesaniSkillwriting-shape
Take a markdown file of raw material and shape it into an article through a conversational session — drafting candidate openings, growing the piece paragraph by paragraph, arguing about format (lists, tables, callouts, quotes) at each step. Use when the user has a pile of notes, fragments, or a rough draft and wants help turning it into something publishable.
Also in 60 projects that use this
ryotaroh180105Skillclaude-handoff
Hand the current conversation off to a fresh background agent that picks up the work immediately.
Also in 42 projects that use this
- +1 more from Lesani
Other versions195 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 150
- mattpocock/skills★ 309k35% same
- QuivrHQ/quivr★ 40k39% same
- The-Vibe-Company/quivr★ 40k39% same
- windmill-labs/windmill★ 18k45% same
- GreyDGL/PentestGPT★ 16k36% same
- formbricks/formbricks★ 13k35% same
- ArcReel/ArcReel★ 6.3k35% same
- vinvcn/mattpocock-skills-zh-CN★ 5.5k15% same
- withcoral/coral★ 4.9k35% same
- bestofjs/bestofjs★ 3.1k36% same
140 more not listed
Wrote their own version · 45
- rohitg00/pro-workflow★ 2.9ksame name
- stevesolun/ctx★ 583same name
- devcxl/mattpocock-skills-zh★ 522same name
- Mathews-Tom/armory★ 340same name
- proflead/codex-skills-library★ 153same name
- etr/groundwork★ 45same name
- nimadorostkar/Claude-Skills-collection★ 33same name
- WenWuZhiDao/mattpocock-skills-zh★ 27same name
- oribarilan/97★ 25same name
- Integralist/agent-skills★ 23same name
35 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository31 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- ask-smittSkill
- change-walkthroughSkill
- closeoutSkill
- codebase-designSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- deliver-specSkill
- deliver-ticketSkill
- diagnosing-bugsSkill
- grill-with-docsSkill
- implementSkill
- improve-codebase-architectureSkill
- prototypeSkill
- prSkill
- researchSkill
- resolving-merge-conflictsSkill
- review-feedbackSkill
- setup-federated-workflowSkill
- tddSkill
- to-specSkill
- to-ticketsSkill
- triageSkill
- wayfinderSkill
- wizardSkill
- grillingSkill
- grill-meSkill
- handoffSkill
- teachSkill
- to-questionnaireSkill
- wait-whatSkill
- writing-for-agentsSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
8 rules. 3 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
3
Common
Most of the 183 edited versions we read keep these.
4
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 14
Follow Repository-qualified Context Pointers through the configured portable repository identities.
- Distinctive: line 18
Every human-confirmed domain-language or architecture change produces a complete Domain Model Delta immediately.
- Distinctive: line 29
Use CONTEXT-MAP-FORMAT.md for the configured Context Map of one repository.
- Very specific: line 35
When the user uses a term that conflicts with the existing language in CONTEXT.md, call it out immediately.
- Common: line 39
When the user uses vague or overloaded terms, propose a precise canonical term.
- Common: line 43
When domain relationships are being discussed, stress-test them with specific scenarios.
- Common: line 47
When the user states how something works, check whether the code agrees.
- Distinctive: line 57
Check whether an existing ADR already covers the decision before creating one.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 183 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Domain Modeling
Actively build and sharpen the project's domain model as you design. This is the active discipline: challenge terms, invent edge-case scenarios, and write the glossary and decisions down the moment they crystallise. Merely reading CONTEXT.md for vocabulary does not invoke domain modeling.
Orient before modeling
Load DOMAIN-ORIENTATION.md. If docs/agents/domain.md exists, read it and perform the configured Domain Orientation.
Follow Repository-qualified Context Pointers through the configured portable repository identities. Checkout proximity may help resolve an already selected owner; it never selects an owner or grants write authority.
Output and capture authority
Every human-confirmed domain-language or architecture change produces a complete Domain Model Delta immediately. Resolve its owner and route during Domain Orientation. Do not batch confirmed results or reduce them to reminders.
- An explicit standalone invocation grants canonical capture by default: apply each confirmed delta immediately to its routed
CONTEXT.md,CONTEXT-MAP.md, or ADR owner unless the user asks for discussion only. - A composed or model-invoked use returns each delta as output without writing canonical artifacts or selecting a planning persistence destination. It may apply a delta only when explicitly granted canonical capture.
Capture authority changes only the destination, never the modeling depth or delta contents.
Create routed artifacts lazily
Under canonical capture, create the configured Canonical Context Document, Context Map, or ADR only when the first owned change requires it. Do not pre-create empty canonical documents.
Use CONTEXT-MAP-FORMAT.md for the configured Context Map of one repository. Preserve a compatible existing layout. A Federated Context Map follows the Domain Federation contract selected during orientation.
During the session
Challenge against the glossary
When the user uses a term that conflicts with the existing language in CONTEXT.md, call it out immediately. "Your glossary defines 'cancellation' as X, but you seem to mean Y — which is it?"
Sharpen fuzzy language
When the user uses vague or overloaded terms, propose a precise canonical term. "You're saying 'account' — do you mean the Customer or the User? Those are different things."
Discuss concrete scenarios
When domain relationships are being discussed, stress-test them with specific scenarios. Invent scenarios that probe edge cases and force the user to be precise about the boundaries between concepts.
Cross-reference with code
When the user states how something works, check whether the code agrees. If you find a contradiction, surface it: "Your code cancels entire Orders, but you just said partial cancellation is possible — which is right?"
Capture resolved language immediately
Emit each resolved term's complete Domain Model Delta immediately. Apply Output and capture authority, and format a routed glossary update with CONTEXT-FORMAT.md.
Architecture decisions
Record an ADR when a decision has significant rationale that cannot be reliably recovered from code and whose loss would make future changes harder to judge. Ordinary implementation choices need no ADR. Skipping an ADR does not justify copying its explanation into CONTEXT.md or README.md; the explanation may need no separate documentation.
Check whether an existing ADR already covers the decision before creating one. Extend it when clarifying the same decision; preserve its history with a superseding ADR when an accepted decision changes.
Under canonical capture, use ADR-FORMAT.md in the routed owner. Otherwise return the decision's Delta with its intended ADR route when a record is warranted, or planning only when no canonical change is needed. Capture authority does not change the selection criterion.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

