closeout
Skill4 starsChanged 15 days agoMITView on GitHub
Close an accepted delivery and remove its disposable resources when the user requests closeout or an authorized workflow delegates it.
11 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- chrislacey89/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 4, 2026
- jaywedgeworth22/BotFleettheir own version, first seen Nov 3, 2026
- Simple-With-Us/BotFleettheir own version, first seen Nov 3, 2026
- Jorgut/skill-atlastheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- leek/agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- XBTDMT/xbt-skills-packtheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use setup.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
VercelSkillsetup
Set up Vercel CLI and project configuration. Use when the user says "set up Vercel", "configure Vercel", "link to Vercel", or "vercel init".
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions11 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 11
- kriegcloud/beep-effect★ 78same name
- dannys-code-corner/incan★ 73same name
- HaipingShi/coderail★ 8same name
- leek/agent-skills★ 5same name
- chrislacey89/skills★ 4same name
- jaywedgeworth22/BotFleet★ 4same name
- Simple-With-Us/BotFleet★ 4same name
- Jorgut/skill-atlas★ 2same name
- aylee/agent-os★ 0same name
- braincandy-parallel/tamarindos-workflow-kit★ 0same name
1 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository31 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- ask-smittSkill
- change-walkthroughSkill
- codebase-designSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- deliver-specSkill
- deliver-ticketSkill
- diagnosing-bugsSkill
- domain-modelingSkill
- grill-with-docsSkill
- implementSkill
- improve-codebase-architectureSkill
- prototypeSkill
- prSkill
- researchSkill
- resolving-merge-conflictsSkill
- review-feedbackSkill
- setup-federated-workflowSkill
- tddSkill
- to-specSkill
- to-ticketsSkill
- triageSkill
- wayfinderSkill
- wizardSkill
- grillingSkill
- grill-meSkill
- handoffSkill
- teachSkill
- to-questionnaireSkill
- wait-whatSkill
- writing-for-agentsSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
7 rules. 0 are common, 7 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 11 edited versions we read keep these.
7
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 10
Use the conversation and existing delivery records to resolve the task.
- Distinctive: line 14
Read the applicable project instructions and Work Tracker, Code Host, and routing-label bindings.
- Distinctive: line 20
If delivery remains incomplete, preserve the resources needed to finish it and report the concrete missing condition.
- Distinctive: line 46
Stop only processes whose ownership was established, such as this task's development server or port forward.
- Distinctive: line 50
Delete the verified task branches after their worktrees are removed.
- Distinctive: line 52
Delete a remote branch only if its current head still matches the approved candidate.
- Distinctive: line 58
Verify removed worktree paths and registrations are absent, deleted local and remote branch refs are absent, and the ticket remains …
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 11 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Closeout
Finish the current delivery after acceptance. An explicit user request or a delegated closeout assignment carrying the user's authorization permits the scoped completion comment, tracker transition, and removal of disposable worktrees and local and remote branches. Honor the assignment's scope and retained resources. Automatic skill selection alone grants no closure or deletion authority.
Use the conversation and existing delivery records to resolve the task. Reuse the user's acceptance and earlier permissions. Ask only for missing information that prevents a specific action. Continue independent work while that action remains blocked.
1. Establish scope and completion
Read the applicable project instructions and Work Tracker, Code Host, and routing-label bindings. Use their configured providers and authentication. Read operational runbooks when checking build or deployment systems.
Identify the delivery ticket, repositories, final MR or PR revisions, deployment evidence where required, and acceptance. Include follow-up fixes and throwaway prototypes from this task. Interpret "all worktrees and branches" within this task's scope unless the user explicitly names a broader scope.
Check the current ticket and merge states. Match the accepted delivery to its final revision and, when deployment is part of completion, the successful build and deployed artifact. Reuse recorded checks that still apply to that revision. Distinguish user acceptance from checks performed by the agent. Closeout authorization does not establish that a missing build, deployment, or acceptance check passed.
If delivery remains incomplete, preserve the resources needed to finish it and report the concrete missing condition. Close only tickets whose own completion criteria are satisfied. Leave parent specifications and unrelated tickets under their existing lifecycle.
Done when every scoped delivery has a supported completion decision and every repository is identified.
2. Inventory cleanup candidates
For each repository, inspect worktrees, local branches, exact remote branch heads, and task-owned running processes. Record each candidate's path, branch, head SHA, and ownership evidence from the task or delivery record. A name prefix alone is insufficient ownership evidence.
Inspect each candidate worktree's tracked and untracked changes. Account for ignored files that removal would also delete. Known generated dependencies are disposable; retain unknown files and human edits. Preserve the user's main checkout, its current branch, unrelated worktrees, and specification-owned integration branches and worktrees during ticket closeout. A ticket's Target Branch is not its disposable source branch.
For delivered branches, confirm the provider reports the corresponding MR or PR merged and the candidate head matches the delivered source revision. Squash and rebase merges can make Git ancestry checks insufficient. A throwaway prototype may be unmerged if its ownership and disposable purpose are established. Preserve branches with later commits until those commits are accounted for.
Done when every candidate is either safe to remove or retained with a concrete reason.
3. Record and close
Before deleting local evidence, publish a concise completion record through the configured tracker. Include the final result, MR or PR links, revision, applicable build and deployment links, artifact identifier, and acceptance evidence. If no tracker applies, preserve the record outside worktrees scheduled for deletion. Reuse an equivalent existing record on repeated invocation.
Use the tracker's available completion transitions and required fields. Choose the normal completion path and resolution. For Jira, inspect transitions and required fields at the current status rather than hardcoding IDs. A validator may require a comment even when transition metadata omits it. Read validation errors and correct the specific payload. After an uncertain write response, re-read state before retrying.
Preserve historical coordination comments. A new acceptance record can resolve an earlier request for human verification. Remove obsolete routing labels and release this task's agent claim only as the project binding requires. Preserve unrelated labels and human ownership.
Done when the completion record is readable and a fresh tracker read confirms the intended status and resolution, or the exact blocker is recorded. If closure fails, retain any resources needed to retry it.
4. Remove task resources
Stop only processes whose ownership was established, such as this task's development server or port forward. Run removal commands from a retained directory.
Recheck candidate heads and worktree status immediately before deletion. Remove clean disposable worktrees with git worktree remove using exact paths. If removal refuses, inspect the reason and preserve unexplained contents instead of forcing deletion.
Delete the verified task branches after their worktrees are removed. Use ordinary local branch deletion where possible. Forced local branch deletion is appropriate for a verified squash merge or an established throwaway prototype under the invocation's cleanup authorization.
Delete a remote branch only if its current head still matches the approved candidate. Use an exact expected-SHA lease or an equivalent conditional provider operation to protect concurrent updates. Treat an already absent branch as complete. Remove only corresponding stale remote-tracking refs.
Done when every safe candidate has been removed or has a recorded removal failure, and all retained resources remain intact.
5. Verify and report
Verify removed worktree paths and registrations are absent, deleted local and remote branch refs are absent, and the ticket remains complete. On repeated invocation, perform only missing work without duplicating comments or transitions.
Report the ticket link and final status, counts of removed worktrees and branches, and any retained resources with reasons. If an action was blocked, distinguish completed closure from incomplete cleanup. Archive the conversation only when the user requests it.
Done when every scoped resource has a verified outcome and the user has the concise closeout result.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

