implement
Skill4 starsChanged 15 days agoMITView on GitHub
Implement repository deliveries from authoritative specs or tickets. Use for standalone implementation and for one repository delivery narrowed by deliver-ticket.
191 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- revisit-studies/studytheir own version, first seen Nov 9, 2026
- dz114879/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Dimon94/dveritytheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Dimon94/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- The-Vibe-Company/quivrtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- miklschmidt/archboardtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use setup-ts-deep-modules, ask-matt and 4 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
liufeng1976Skillsetup-ts-deep-modules
Wire dependency-cruiser into a TypeScript repo so each package is a deep module — implementation hidden in subfolders, reachable only through its entry-point files. User-invoked.
Also in 43 projects that use this
GoogleSkillask-matt
Ask which skill or flow fits your situation. A router over the skills in this repo.
Also in 91 projects that use this
RoentekSkillloop-me
Grill me about specs for the workflows I want to build, within this workspace.
Also in 50 projects that use this
ryotaroh180105Skillclaude-handoff
Hand the current conversation off to a fresh background agent that picks up the work immediately.
Also in 42 projects that use this
LesaniSkillwriting-beats
Shape an article as a journey of beats, choose-your-own-adventure style. The user picks a starting beat from the raw material, you write only that beat, then offer options for where to pivot next, beat by beat, until the article reaches a natural end. Use when the user has raw material and wants to assemble it as a narrative rather than an argument.
Also in 47 projects that use this
AWSSkillimplement-spec
Implement the result of /to-spec and /to-tickets in code.
Also in 67 projects that use this
Other versions191 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 191
- mattpocock/skills★ 309ksame name
- QuivrHQ/quivr★ 40ksame name
- The-Vibe-Company/quivr★ 40ksame name
- foambubble/foam★ 17ksame name
- formbricks/formbricks★ 13ksame name
- ArcReel/ArcReel★ 6.3ksame name
- vinvcn/mattpocock-skills-zh-CN★ 5.5ksame name
- fallow-rs/fallow★ 5.3ksame name
- withcoral/coral★ 4.9ksame name
- bestofjs/bestofjs★ 3.1ksame name
181 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository31 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- ask-smittSkill
- change-walkthroughSkill
- closeoutSkill
- codebase-designSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- deliver-specSkill
- deliver-ticketSkill
- diagnosing-bugsSkill
- domain-modelingSkill
- grill-with-docsSkill
- improve-codebase-architectureSkill
- prototypeSkill
- prSkill
- researchSkill
- resolving-merge-conflictsSkill
- review-feedbackSkill
- setup-federated-workflowSkill
- tddSkill
- to-specSkill
- to-ticketsSkill
- triageSkill
- wayfinderSkill
- wizardSkill
- grillingSkill
- grill-meSkill
- handoffSkill
- teachSkill
- to-questionnaireSkill
- wait-whatSkill
- writing-for-agentsSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
9 rules. 0 are common, 8 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 171 edited versions we read keep these.
8
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 8
Read delivery records before resolving the assignment.
- Distinctive: line 14
When the user authorizes one or more writable Repository Deliveries directly, read Standalone assignments.
- Very specific: line 15
When deliver-ticket supplies one complete narrowing assignment for exactly one Repository Scope entry, read Coordinator narrowing.
- Distinctive: line 17
Every writable Repository Delivery must supply or resolve:
- Distinctive: line 39
Use the authorized isolated writable checkout.
- Distinctive: line 49
Run focused tests and typechecking during the work.
- Distinctive: line 51
Complete when: every authorized outcome is implemented in committed green slices, classified unchanged, or represented by an exact blocker …
- Distinctive: line 59
Run the full repository-owned validation suite after implementation.
- Distinctive: line 71
Complete when: every authorized Repository Delivery satisfies its assignment's completion requirements and the requested result has been …
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 171 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Implement the work described by the user in the authoritative spec or tickets.
Read delivery records before resolving the assignment.
Resolve the assignment
Classify the assignment before Context Assembly or checkout changes.
- When the user authorizes one or more writable Repository Deliveries directly, read Standalone assignments.
- When
deliver-ticketsupplies one complete narrowing assignment for exactly one Repository Scope entry, read Coordinator narrowing.
Every writable Repository Delivery must supply or resolve:
- Repository ID and Repository Reference;
- writable checkout or Execution Worktree and its branch;
- exact launch commit or Fixed Review Base;
- repository-specific required outcome;
- authoritative sources and repository instructions;
- complete Settled Seam records and their test approaches;
- repository-owned Validation Obligations and the repository sources that define validation commands.
A Fixed Review Base is the exact starting commit against which a Repository Delivery is implemented and reviewed.
Read-only context and validation repositories remain outside writable scope. Missing authority, a worktree that disagrees with the assignment, or a required change to approved scope, acceptance behavior, or a Settled Seam is a Material contradiction. Preserve safe work and return the conflicting sources. Authority comes from the assignment, not inference.
Complete when: the assignment mode is explicit; the selected branch's authority gate passes; the writable scope, authority, and every required delivery field are complete; or a Material contradiction or explicit authority stop has been returned without repository mutation.
Prepare each delivery
Validate that the writable path belongs to the Repository Reference and that its starting revision agrees with the supplied launch commit or Fixed Review Base. Read that repository's instructions and resolve its validation commands from the supplied sources. Before each implementation decision, perform configured Domain Orientation for the affected behavior and read the applicable canonical context, ADRs, and nearest relevant prior art. Use the prepared ticket's self-contained contract; follow indexed sources when that decision needs them. Do not repeat publication's planning audit or use one repository's instructions as authority for another.
Record the Repository ID, writable path, Fixed Review Base, authoritative sources, complete Settled Seams, test approaches, Validation Obligations, and validation commands before editing.
Use the authorized isolated writable checkout. Classify existing changes against the assignment. Preserve unrelated content and return a blocker when it cannot be isolated without changing user work.
Complete when: the writable path, starting revision, repository instructions, authorized outcomes, seams, and validation approach permit the first implementation slice, and unrelated content is either isolated or reported as a blocker. Required domain reading precedes the slice that depends on it.
Implement through TDD
Treat each task as an increment to the application's accumulated invariants. Accepted task decisions authorize adding, changing, or removing specific invariants; existing ones otherwise remain in force. Before removing or weakening behavior whose purpose is unclear, investigate the invariant it protects through surrounding code, tests, and relevant commit history. Long-standing code warrants extra scrutiny, though age does not prove correctness. If its purpose remains unclear or conflicts with the task, preserve it and escalate with evidence and the concrete tradeoff. Proceed when an accepted decision authorizes the change or evidence establishes an implementation error within scope. Satisfying the new requirement alone does not justify erasing an existing invariant.
Work in vertical slices. Use the tdd skill with the authoritative sources and complete Settled Seam records, including each seam's owning module, caller-visible interface, location, status, observable behavior, test approach, and nearest prior art.
Run focused tests and typechecking during the work. After each coherent green iteration, commit focused changes to that delivery's branch. Each commit contains changes from one repository only.
Complete when: every authorized outcome is implemented in committed green slices, classified unchanged, or represented by an exact blocker or Material contradiction.
Validate the exact result
Ad hoc validation is allowed. Keep one-off validation code outside the committed delivery. If a check belongs in the MR or PR, implement it as a regular test following the repository's existing test conventions. Do not commit ad hoc runners or their supporting configuration and documentation.
Establish a Clean delivery state before final validation: every assignment-owned change is committed and the worktree is clean. Isolate unrelated or uncommitted content safely, or return a blocker with the exact status. Validation from a dirty worktree is not attributable to HEAD.
Run the full repository-owned validation suite after implementation. Record every command, outcome, and relevant limitation against the exact commit it validated. Resolve the Exact local HEAD and clean-worktree status after validation. A changed head or worktree makes prior validation evidence stale and requires a refresh.
Return one Repository Delivery result for each writable entry with:
- Repository ID, Repository Reference, writable path, and branch;
- Fixed Review Base and Exact local HEAD;
- changed, unchanged, or blocked outcome;
- Clean delivery state;
- focused commits;
- repository validation commands and outcomes;
- remaining blockers or Material contradiction details.
Complete when: every authorized Repository Delivery satisfies its assignment's completion requirements and the requested result has been returned.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

