live-state-verification
Skill0 starsChanged 6 days agoMITView on GitHub
Use when verifying service health, deployed state, cluster objects, credentials, or automation results where the wrong auth context can produce false empty results.
In this repository108 other files it gives its agents.
- adaptive-estimationSkill
- adaptive-loop-budgetingSkill
- adopt-and-deleteSkill
- adversarial-reviewSkill
- agent-drives-uiSkill
- agentic-coding-loopSkill
- agent-otel-trajectorySkill
- agents-as-iac-modulesSkill
- ascii-ui-mockupsSkill
- authoring-html-emailSkill
- authoring-skills-vs-mcpSkill
- batched-ssh-enumerationSkill
- c4-architectureSkill
- challenge-the-premiseSkill
- codegraph-bootstrapSkill
- codegraph-worktree-startupSkill
- colocated-pod-tolerationsSkill
- command-creatorSkill
- complexity-budgetsSkill
- connector-readinessSkill
- context-anchored-patchingSkill
- continuous-issue-resolutionSkill
- credential-proxySkill
- criticality-tiered-reportingSkill
- data-connector-buildingSkill
- declarative-firstSkill
- disk-pressure-forensicsSkill
- early-return-over-elseSkill
- email-triageSkill
- enums-codify-behaviorSkill
- ephemeral-workspace-lifecycleSkill
- event-sourcingSkill
- evidence-claim-boundariesSkill
- exhaustive-matchSkill
- feature-coverage-not-just-line-coverageSkill
- full-disk-forensicsSkill
- gate-before-pushSkill
- github-pr-shepherdingSkill
- graceful-shutdown-stateful-agentsSkill
- grounded-generationSkill
- iac-incident-responseSkill
- iac-not-ad-hocSkill
- instrumented-service-scaffoldSkill
- interface-over-conditionalsSkill
- knowledge-routingSkill
- lean-on-oss-standardsSkill
- live-money-disciplineSkill
- loop-governance-and-learningSkill
- low-level-executor-task-specSkill
- map-dispatch-over-conditionalsSkill
- merge-conflict-disciplineSkill
- mermaid-diagramsSkill
- oke-arc-runners-opentofuSkill
- orchestrate-agySkill
- orchestrate-claudeSkill
- orchestrate-codexSkill
- orchestrate-geminiSkill
- otel-emit-at-willSkill
- parameter-designSkill
- parse-dont-validateSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
11 rules. About 0 are common, 10 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈10
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 8
Use this when a result depends on the real system state, not just logs or a local assumption.
- Distinctive: line 13
Use the correct identity and environment for the artifact being checked.
- Distinctive: line 14
Do not suppress stderr on presence or health checks.
- Distinctive: line 17
Prefer direct artifact checks over proxy logs.
- Distinctive: line 29
Run the primary check without hiding errors.
- Distinctive: line 30
Run a second check from a different plane:
- Distinctive: line 38
do not store credentials or sensitive payloads
- Distinctive: line 42
When the artifact is an agent tool, MCP server, sidecar, or gateway, startup success is not enough.
- Very specific: line 46
Check inherited runtime environment, especially HOME, cache, config, and durable data directories after privilege drops.
- Distinctive: line 48
Check required persisted files are owned and readable/writable by the runtime UID, not just by root during entrypoint setup.
- Distinctive: line 54
Prefer an exact-image or deployed-pod probe over a host/root smoke when HOME, UID, or filesystem ownership can differ.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Live State Verification
Use this when a result depends on the real system state, not just logs or a local assumption.
Verification Rules
- Use the correct identity and environment for the artifact being checked.
- Do not suppress stderr on presence or health checks; auth errors and empty results can look identical after redirection.
- Corroborate important claims from at least two views.
- Prefer direct artifact checks over proxy logs.
Procedure
- Name the artifact:
- deployed revision, job run, pod, service endpoint, repository setting, secret version, document, email, or workflow result.
- Confirm the auth context:
- account/user
- cluster/project/region
- kubeconfig or exec plugin
- token scope or installation
- Run the primary check without hiding errors.
- Run a second check from a different plane:
- API plus UI/CLI
- controller status plus workload behavior
- repository metadata plus branch protection behavior
- pod environment plus application-level operation
- startup logs plus the exact model-facing tool or endpoint call
- Preserve concise evidence:
- command class, artifact id, timestamp, observed status
- do not store credentials or sensitive payloads
Runtime Tool Verification
When the artifact is an agent tool, MCP server, sidecar, or gateway, startup success is not enough. Verify the operation from the same environment that the model or runtime child process uses.
- Check inherited runtime environment, especially
HOME, cache, config, and durable data directories after privilege drops. - Check required persisted files are owned and readable/writable by the runtime UID, not just by root during entrypoint setup.
- Probe a required model-facing operation, such as a harmless list/accounts or health/list-tools call, after rollout.
- Report the actual failing stage separately from package/image/access failures so CI does not misclassify runtime setup errors.
- Prefer an exact-image or deployed-pod probe over a host/root smoke when HOME, UID, or filesystem ownership can differ.
Failure Modes
- Missing exec credential plugin on
PATH. - Checking the wrong cluster or project.
- Token has read access to one repo/org but not the target.
- Stderr redirection hides a permission error.
- A controller is healthy while the workload it manages is not.
- A log says "sent" or "applied" but the external artifact never changed.
- A root-run startup canary passes while the runtime child keeps
HOME=/rootor cannot read persisted files after dropping privileges. - A gateway registers tools but a required model-facing tool call still fails.
Done
- The claim is backed by the real artifact or two independent views.
- Runtime/tool claims include a same-UID or model-facing operation, not only a root-run startup smoke.
- Any uncertainty is stated as uncertainty rather than upgraded to "verified."
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

