agentleFS
selamy-labsselamy-labs/agent-skills/skills/agent-otel-trajectory/SKILL.md

agent-otel-trajectory

Skill0 starsChanged 6 days agoMITView on GitHub

Emit OpenTelemetry trajectory spans (tool-call, latency, token usage) as an agent works — vendor-neutral, via otel-cli wrapping shell tool-calls, exported to any OTLP backend.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

1 rule. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈1

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Don't make the agent call a tool to emit its own spans (circular, unreliable).

    line 16

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

agent-otel-trajectory

Agent runs are a black box unless they emit telemetry. To debug, optimize cost, and grade the journey (not just the answer), an agent should emit OpenTelemetry trajectory spans as it works: one span per tool-call / iteration, with latency, token usage, and outcome. Backend-only or LLM-API-only metrics miss the agent's actual decision path.

The landscape (survey)

  • equinix-labs/otel-cli — the mature, vendor-neutral CLI for emitting OTLP spans from shell: otel-cli exec --name "<step>" -- <command> wraps any command in a span (attributes, events, span kinds, context propagation, background spans). Best fit for EMITTING trajectory telemetry from shell-driven agents/harnesses.
  • traceloop/opentelemetry-mcp-server — an MCP server for querying/analyzing existing traces (Jaeger/Tempo/Traceloop). Use it for an agent that debugs via traces, NOT for emitting its own — a different job.
  • OTel GenAI/MCP semantic conventions (opentelemetry.io/docs/specs/semconv/gen-ai/) — use the standard attribute names so spans are portable.

Recommendation

Don't make the agent call a tool to emit its own spans (circular, unreliable). Instrument the harness/loop (the thing that runs tool-calls) to wrap each tool-call in an otel-cli span. No MCP-server dependency; works anywhere a shell does.

The pattern

  1. One root span per agent run, child spans per iteration/tool-call:
    otel-cli exec --service "<agent>" --name "tool:<name>" \
      --attrs "gen_ai.operation.name=<tool>,gen_ai.request.model=<model>,gen_ai.usage.input_tokens=<n>,gen_ai.usage.output_tokens=<n>" \
      -- <the tool command>
  2. Attributes that matter (use semconv): gen_ai.request.model, gen_ai.usage.input_tokens/output_tokens, gen_ai.operation.name, the tool name, the task/run id, success/error. Latency is the span duration (automatic).
  3. Context propagation: propagate the traceparent down so child tool-calls nest under the run (otel-cli --tp-print/env propagation).
  4. Export vendor-neutral OTLP → the environment's backend (e.g. Cloud Trace on GCP) via the OTLP endpoint env (OTEL_EXPORTER_OTLP_ENDPOINT). Never hardcode a vendor.
  5. Emit on failure too — error spans with the failure attribute are the most valuable (where the trajectory broke).

DONE means

An agent run produces a trace in the backend with one span per tool-call showing latency + token usage + outcome, nested under a run span, using gen_ai semconv attributes — so a failure or a cost spike is visible in the trace, not inferred. Verified by opening the trace, not by "instrumented".

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.