business-model
Skill1 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub
Help founders design pricing strategy, analyze unit economics, and create competitive positioning. Use when a founder asks "How should I price this?", "What's my unit economics?", "How do I position against competitors?", "Is this a good business model?", "Help me figure out my margins", "What's my LTV/CAC?", "Should I do subscription or usage-based?", or needs to articulate their business model for investors.
13 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- yuusakuri/agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- vijaysuperpositionist/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- daviszhen/agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- The-Utopia-Studio/skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- devpilotX/skillstheir own version, first seen Sep 22, 2026
- alexsmedile/hormozi-skillstheir own version, first seen Aug 29, 2026
Other versions13 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 13
- alexsmedile/hormozi-skills★ 208same name
- The-Utopia-Studio/skills★ 6same name
- moasq/ios-dev-agent★ 4same name
- Adhamxon/claude-code-skills★ 2same name
- skytiger6724/qwen-skills★ 2same name
- yuusakuri/agent-skills★ 2same name
- daviszhen/agent-skills★ 1same name
- miovrag/claude-skills★ 1same name
- devpilotX/skills★ 0same name
- maeng777/claude-skills★ 0same name
3 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository14 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- customer-successSkill
- finance-accountingSkill
- founder-playbookSkill
- fundraisingSkill
- go-to-marketSkill
- growth-analyticsSkill
- idea-validationSkill
- legal-complianceSkill
- marketing-brandSkill
- operationsSkill
- productSkill
- salesSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 12 edited versions we read keep these.
1
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 14
Ask: "Where are you in business model development?"
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 12 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Business Model Design
Guide founders from business model selection through pricing, unit economics, and competitive positioning to investor-ready articulation.
Workflow
1. Diagnose Current State
Ask: "Where are you in business model development?"
| State | Signals | Next Step |
| No model yet | Has product idea, no monetization plan | → Step 2: Select Business Model Type |
| Model chosen | Knows type (SaaS, marketplace, etc.), needs pricing | → Step 3: Design Pricing |
| Has pricing | Needs to validate unit economics | → Step 4: Unit Economics Analysis |
| Entering market | Needs differentiation strategy | → Step 5: Competitive Positioning |
| Pitch prep | Needs to articulate model clearly | → Step 6: Create Deliverables |
2. Select Business Model Type
Match founder's product to the right model archetype. See references/business-model-patterns.md for the complete pattern library.
Core Model Types (YC Framework):
| Model | Description | Key Metrics | Best For |
| SaaS | Cloud subscription software | MRR/ARR, NRR, CAC | B2B software with recurring value |
| Transactional | Take cut of transactions | GTV, Net Revenue, Retention | Fintech, payments |
| Marketplace | Connect buyers + sellers | GMV, Take Rate, Liquidity | Platforms with network effects |
| Subscription | Recurring consumer service | MRR, Churn, LTV | Consumer products with habit |
| Enterprise | Large contracts to big companies | Bookings, ACV, Pipeline | Complex B2B, long sales cycles |
| Usage-Based | Pay per consumption | Monthly Revenue, Retention | APIs, infrastructure, cloud |
| E-commerce | Sell products online | Revenue, Gross Margin, CAC | D2C brands, physical goods |
| Advertising | Monetize free users via ads | DAU/MAU, Retention, CPM | High-scale consumer apps |
Selection Questions:
- Who pays? (End user, business, advertiser, both sides?)
- How often do they pay? (One-time, recurring, per-use?)
- What's the natural buying pattern? (Impulse, considered, enterprise?)
- Where's the value? (Product, platform, network?)
3. Design Pricing Strategy
Three foundational approaches — choose based on market position:
| Strategy | When to Use | Method |
| Value-Based | Differentiated product, clear ROI | Price based on customer value delivered |
| Cost-Plus | Commodity market, known costs | Cost + target margin (rarely optimal for SaaS) |
| Competitive | Established market, price-sensitive | Position relative to alternatives |
See references/pricing-frameworks.md for detailed implementation.
Pricing Model Selection (for SaaS/subscription):
| Model | Pros | Cons | Use When |
| Per-seat | Simple, predictable | Limits adoption | Value scales with users |
| Per-feature (tiered) | Natural upsell path | Complexity | Clear feature-value tiers exist |
| Usage-based | Scales with customer | Revenue volatility | Value directly tied to consumption |
| Flat-rate | Dead simple | Leaves money on table | Early stage, testing |
| Freemium | Low friction acquisition | Conversion challenge | Wide top-of-funnel, viral potential |
| Hybrid | Flexibility | Complexity | Enterprise + self-serve motions |
Value Metric Selection (HOPE Framework): Find the metric that best captures value delivery:
- High value connection — Does it correlate to customer outcomes?
- Obvious to customer — Is it familiar and predictable?
- Predictable — Can customers forecast their usage?
- Easy to implement — Can you actually measure and bill it?
Common value metrics: seats, contacts, API calls, records, storage, revenue processed, messages sent.
Pricing Sanity Checks:
- Does price reflect value delivered?
- Can customers predict their bill?
- Is there a natural expansion path?
- Does pricing align with how customers budget?
4. Unit Economics Analysis
The health check for any business model. See references/unit-economics.md for formulas and benchmarks.
Core Metrics:
| Metric | Formula | Healthy Benchmark |
| CAC | Total S&M Spend ÷ New Customers | Varies by model |
| LTV | (ARPU × Gross Margin) ÷ Churn Rate | 3× CAC minimum |
| LTV:CAC Ratio | LTV ÷ CAC | 3:1 to 5:1 optimal |
| CAC Payback | CAC ÷ Monthly Gross Profit | <12 months for SaaS |
| Gross Margin | (Revenue - COGS) ÷ Revenue | >70% for SaaS |
Diagnostic Questions:
- What does it cost to acquire a customer? (CAC)
- How much will that customer pay over their lifetime? (LTV)
- How long until you recoup acquisition cost? (Payback)
- Are you making money on each transaction? (Gross Margin)
Red Flags:
- LTV:CAC < 1:1 — Unsustainable, losing money on every customer
- LTV:CAC 1:1 to 2:1 — Dangerous, need optimization
- CAC Payback > 18 months — Cash flow risk, slow growth
- Gross Margin < 50% — Not a software business, harder to scale
By Business Model Type:
| Model | Key Economics | Target |
| B2B SaaS | LTV:CAC 3:1+, Payback <12mo | NRR >100% |
| B2C SaaS | LTV:CAC 3:1+, Payback <6mo | Viral coefficient >1 |
| Marketplace | Unit margin positive, GMV growth | Take rate 10-20% |
| E-commerce | Contribution margin >30%, CAC < first order | Repeat rate >40% |
5. Competitive Positioning
How to stand out in a crowded market. See references/positioning-frameworks.md for detailed frameworks.
April Dunford's Positioning Flow:
Competitive Alternatives → Unique Capabilities → Value → Target Customer → Market CategoryStep-by-step:
- List Competitive Alternatives
- What would customers do if you didn't exist?
- Include: direct competitors, indirect solutions, doing nothing, manual processes
- Identify Unique Capabilities
- What do you have that alternatives don't?
- Features, technology, service, price, experience
- Map to Value
- So what? What does each capability enable?
- Connect features → benefits → outcomes
- Define Best-Fit Customers
- Who cares most about your unique value?
- What characteristics make someone care?
- Choose Market Category
- What context makes your value obvious?
- Options: existing category, subcategory, new category
Positioning Statement Template:
For [target customer] who [need/job], [product] is a [category] that [key benefit]. Unlike [competitors], we [key differentiator].
Porter's Strategic Options:
- Cost Leadership — Win on price (lowest cost structure)
- Differentiation — Win on value (unique capabilities worth premium)
- Focus — Win in a niche (cost or differentiation, narrow market)
Positioning Strategies:
| Strategy | When to Use | Risk |
| Head-to-Head | You can genuinely beat the leader | Resource-intensive |
| Big Fish, Small Pond | Niche underserved by leaders | Market may be too small |
| Create New Category | Truly novel, no good comparison | Education cost is high |
6. Create Deliverables
Output 1: Business Model One-Pager
## [Company Name] Business Model
**Model Type:** [SaaS/Marketplace/etc.]
**Value Proposition:**
[One sentence: For whom, what problem, unique solution]
**Customer Segments:**
- Primary: [Description, size, characteristics]
- Secondary: [If applicable]
**Revenue Model:**
- Type: [Subscription/Usage/Transaction/etc.]
- Pricing: [Structure and price points]
- Value metric: [What you charge for]
**Key Metrics:**
| Metric | Current | Target |
|--------|---------|--------|
| MRR/ARR | $ | $ |
| Customers | # | # |
| LTV | $ | $ |
| CAC | $ | $ |
| LTV:CAC | X:1 | X:1 |
**Unit Economics:**
- Gross Margin: X%
- CAC Payback: X months
- Expansion potential: [How customers grow with you]
**Go-to-Market:**
- Primary channel: [How you acquire]
- Sales motion: [Self-serve/Sales-assisted/Enterprise]Output 2: Pricing Recommendation
Document should include:
- Recommended pricing model with rationale
- Specific price points with justification
- Tier structure (if applicable)
- Comparison to alternatives
- Expected conversion/upgrade rates
Output 3: Unit Economics Spreadsheet
Create spreadsheet with:
- CAC calculation (itemized S&M spend)
- LTV calculation (ARPU, churn, margin)
- LTV:CAC ratio
- CAC payback period
- Sensitivity analysis (what if churn changes?)
- 12-month projection
See references/unit-economics.md for template structure.
Output 4: Positioning Statement
Format:
For [target customer with specific characteristics] who [struggle with specific problem], [Product Name] is a [market category] that [delivers specific benefit/outcome]. Unlike [primary alternative], our product [key differentiator that matters to target customer].
Plus supporting elements:
- Competitive alternatives map
- Unique capabilities list
- Value proof points
- Best-fit customer profile
Reference Files
references/business-model-patterns.md— 55+ business model patterns with examplesreferences/pricing-frameworks.md— Value-based, competitive, and hybrid pricing in detailreferences/unit-economics.md— LTV, CAC, formulas, benchmarks, and spreadsheet templatereferences/positioning-frameworks.md— April Dunford method, Porter's strategies, positioning templates
Adapted from Linas Beliūnas's The One-Person Unicorn founder skill set.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

