domain-driven-design
Skill344 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
Use when evolving aggregate invariants, value objects or domain events in an existing DDD-style Spring Boot 4 application, or when DDD is explicitly requested. Preserve existing API identifiers and architecture when changing domain behavior.
25 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- reddygopalkrishna/developer-agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- nledford/engineering-review-boardtheir own version, first seen Nov 3, 2026
- AntonioMellies/claude-code-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- sbrudz/agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- conjurer-rich/skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- hugo082/skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 22, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use clean-architecture, clean-code and 1 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
harrissohail6Skillclean-architecture
Clean architecture and SOLID principles. Auto-activates when designing systems or refactoring code structure.
Also in 4 projects that use this
xenitV1Skillclean-code
Pragmatic coding standards - concise, direct, no over-engineering, no unnecessary comments
Also in 4 projects that use this
SentrySkillreview
Fixture review skill.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions25 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 25
- ciembor/agent-rules-books★ 2.8ksame name
- wondelai/skills★ 2.6ksame name
- techygarg/lattice★ 209same name
- fatonh/symfony-skills★ 35same name
- d-padmanabhan/agent-engineering-handbook★ 17same name
- G1Joshi/Agent-Skills★ 15same name
- nledford/engineering-review-board★ 11same name
- eralmansouri/skills★ 9same name
- reddygopalkrishna/developer-agent-skills★ 8same name
- bernard-ng/skills★ 4same name
15 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository77 other files it gives its agents.
- agent-qa-browser-regressionSkill
- ai-observabilitySkill
- api-versioningSkill
- configuration-propertiesSkill
- container-native-deploymentSkill
- domain-driven-designSkill
- event-driven-messagingSkill
- flyway-migrationsSkill
- hateoasSkill
- hexagonal-architectureSkill
- http-interface-clientsSkill
- idempotency-patternsSkill
- java-supply-chain-securitySkill
- layered-architectureSkill
- mcp-serverSkill
- multi-module-mavenSkill
- multi-tenancySkill
- null-safetySkill
- oauth2-resource-serverSkill
- openapi-firstSkill
- problem-details-rfc9457Skill
- production-observabilitySkill
- resilience-retrySkill
- rest-api-conventionsSkill
- security-audit-loggingSkill
- spring-ai-integrationSkill
- spring-ai-securitySkill
- spring-batchSkill
- spring-boot-migrationSkill
- spring-cloud-gatewaySkill
- spring-data-jpaSkill
- spring-data-redisSkill
- spring-incident-responseSkill
- spring-modulithSkill
- spring-security-jwtSkill
- spring-security-reviewSkill
- testing-pyramidSkill
- transactional-patternsSkill
- webflux-reactive-patternsSkill
- agent-qa-browser-regressionSkill
- ai-observabilitySkill
- api-versioningSkill
- configuration-propertiesSkill
- container-native-deploymentSkill
- event-driven-messagingSkill
- flyway-migrationsSkill
- hateoasSkill
- hexagonal-architectureSkill
- http-interface-clientsSkill
- idempotency-patternsSkill
- java-supply-chain-securitySkill
- layered-architectureSkill
- mcp-serverSkill
- multi-module-mavenSkill
- multi-tenancySkill
- null-safetySkill
- oauth2-resource-serverSkill
- openapi-firstSkill
- problem-details-rfc9457Skill
- production-observabilitySkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 23 edited versions we read keep these.
6
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 14
Prefer references by ID across aggregate boundaries.
- Distinctive: line 19
Keep existing public identifiers and persistence mappings unless the task includes a migration.
- Distinctive: line 159
When integrating with external systems or legacy code, don't let their models leak into your domain
- Distinctive: line 160
Create an ACL — a translation layer that converts external data to your domain language
- Distinctive: line 190
Use the provider's exact monetary representation.
- Distinctive: line 196
Test aggregate invariants, rollback preventing external notification, and recovery from a crash after commit for durable publication.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 23 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Domain-Driven Design
Aggregate Rules
- One repository per aggregate root
- External code only accesses aggregate through root — never child entities directly
- Prefer references by ID across aggregate boundaries; preserve deliberate mappings.
- Choose boundaries from invariants that must commit atomically and expected contention, not a fixed number of child entities. Splitting requires an explicit consistency plan.
The snippets are illustrative and require the application's domain types and imports. Keep existing public identifiers and persistence mappings unless the task includes a migration.
// ✅ Aggregate root controls all access to children
order.addItem(productId, quantity); // through root
order.removeItem(itemId); // through root
// ❌ Direct child access from outside
order.getItems().add(new OrderItem(...)); // bypasses invariantsValue Objects
Immutable, no identity, equality by value:
public record Money(BigDecimal amount, Currency currency) {
public Money {
if (amount.compareTo(BigDecimal.ZERO) < 0)
throw new IllegalArgumentException("Amount cannot be negative");
Objects.requireNonNull(currency);
}
public Money add(Money other) {
if (!currency.equals(other.currency))
throw new CurrencyMismatchException(currency, other.currency);
return new Money(amount.add(other.amount), currency);
}
public static Money of(String amount, String currency) {
return new Money(new BigDecimal(amount), Currency.getInstance(currency));
}
}
public record EmailAddress(String value) {
public EmailAddress {
if (!value.matches("^[\\w.-]+@[\\w.-]+\\.[a-z]{2,}$"))
throw new InvalidEmailException(value);
}
}Domain Events
// Event — immutable record
public record OrderPlaced(OrderId orderId, CustomerId customerId, Money total, Instant occurredAt) {
public static OrderPlaced of(Order order) {
return new OrderPlaced(order.getId(), order.getCustomerId(), order.getTotal(), Instant.now());
}
}
// Collect events in aggregate, publish after save
@Entity
public class Order {
@Transient
private final List<Object> domainEvents = new ArrayList<>();
public void place() {
this.status = OrderStatus.PLACED;
domainEvents.add(OrderPlaced.of(this));
}
public List<Object> pullDomainEvents() {
var events = List.copyOf(domainEvents);
domainEvents.clear();
return events;
}
}
// Publish inside the transaction; save() is not commit.
@Service
@RequiredArgsConstructor
public class OrderApplicationService {
private final OrderRepository orderRepository;
private final ApplicationEventPublisher eventPublisher;
@Transactional
public Order placeOrder(PlaceOrderCommand command) {
Order order = orderRepository.findById(command.orderId()).orElseThrow();
order.place();
Order saved = orderRepository.save(order);
saved.pullDomainEvents().forEach(eventPublisher::publishEvent); // commit-bound listener below
return saved;
}
}
// Listen to events — bind to commit, not just publish.
// @EventListener fires synchronously inside the TX; if the TX later rolls back you've
// already sent the email. AFTER_COMMIT avoids rollback delivery but is best effort.
@Component
@RequiredArgsConstructor
public class OrderPlacedHandler {
private final EmailService emailService;
@TransactionalEventListener(phase = TransactionPhase.AFTER_COMMIT)
public void onOrderPlaced(OrderPlaced event) {
emailService.sendOrderConfirmation(event.customerId(), event.orderId());
}
}Let Spring Data publish for you. Instead of calling
pullDomainEvents()by hand, expose a@DomainEventsmethod (returns the collected events) and an@AfterDomainEventPublicationmethod (clears them) on the aggregate root. Spring Data's repository drains and publishes them automatically on everysave()— no manual wiring in the service.
Neither publication mechanism guarantees durable delivery. For required external effects,
persist an outbox entry with the aggregate change or use a persistent publication registry,
with idempotent consumers and retry/recovery. @Async changes execution, not durability.
Post-commit database writes need a new transaction because the original resources may still
be bound after completion. See transaction boundaries,
messaging and Modulith.
Specifications (complex queries)
public class OrderSpecifications {
public static Specification<Order> byStatus(OrderStatus status) {
return (root, query, cb) -> cb.equal(root.get("status"), status);
}
public static Specification<Order> byCustomer(UUID customerId) {
return (root, query, cb) -> cb.equal(root.get("customerId"), customerId);
}
public static Specification<Order> placedAfter(Instant date) {
return (root, query, cb) -> cb.greaterThan(root.get("placedAt"), date);
}
}
// Compose
Specification<Order> spec = OrderSpecifications.byStatus(PLACED)
.and(OrderSpecifications.byCustomer(customerId))
.and(OrderSpecifications.placedAfter(lastWeek));
orderRepository.findAll(spec, pageable);Anti-Corruption Layer (ACL)
- When integrating with external systems or legacy code, don't let their models leak into your domain
- Create an ACL — a translation layer that converts external data to your domain language
- ACL lives in infrastructure layer, not domain
// ✅ GOOD — ACL translates external payment API to domain concepts
@Component
@RequiredArgsConstructor
public class PaymentGatewayAdapter implements PaymentPort {
private final ExternalPaymentClient client; // third-party SDK
@Override
public PaymentConfirmation charge(OrderId orderId, Money amount) {
// Translate domain → external
PaymentApiRequest apiRequest = new PaymentApiRequest(
orderId.value().toString(),
amount.amount(), // illustrative provider accepts BigDecimal
amount.currency().getCurrencyCode());
// Call external system
PaymentApiResponse apiResponse = client.charge(apiRequest);
// Translate external → domain
return new PaymentConfirmation(
PaymentId.of(apiResponse.getTransactionId()),
apiResponse.isSuccessful() ? PaymentStatus.CONFIRMED : PaymentStatus.DECLINED);
}
}Use the provider's exact monetary representation. For integer minor units, convert with the currency's fraction digits and exact arithmetic; do not silently round or convert money to binary floating point.
Verification
Test aggregate invariants, rollback preventing external notification, and recovery from a crash after commit for durable publication. Verify that existing API IDs and database relationships remain compatible with the requested change.
Gotchas
- Agent creates anemic models with only getters/setters — put behavior on domain objects
- Agent replaces existing Long/UUID API IDs with value objects - preserve the public contract; map internal types explicitly.
- Agent puts domain logic in services — services should orchestrate, not decide
- Agent accesses child entities directly from outside — always go through aggregate root
- Agent confuses save with commit - publish in the transaction and select listener/durable delivery semantics deliberately.
- Agent splits an aggregate at an arbitrary child count - derive boundaries from business invariants.
- Agent lets external API models into domain — use an Anti-Corruption Layer to translate
- Agent adds nullable domain APIs without documenting them - follow the project's JSpecify conventions and mark nullable returns.
- Agent uses removed Boot 4 test annotations - use
@MockitoBeanin place of@MockBean.
Official sources
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

