agentleFS
rrezartprebrezarrezartprebreza/spring-boot-skills/skills/spring-boot-3/multi-tenancy/SKILL.md

multi-tenancy

Skill344 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub

Use when implementing tenant resolution, database or schema isolation, tenant-aware JPA, reactive tenant context, migrations, caching, jobs, or authorization in Spring Boot 3.

5 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

6 rules. 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 5 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 4

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Treat tenant identity as an authorization boundary, not a query convenience.

    line 10
  2. Distinctive:

    Document the selected model and prohibit repositories from bypassing it.

    line 17
  3. Very specific:

    Never trust a public X-Tenant-Id header by itself.

    line 23
  4. Distinctive:

    Run migrations per database/schema with resumable progress and version reporting.

    line 35
  5. Distinctive:

    Test negative cross-tenant access, not only successful tenant queries.

    line 38
  6. Very specific:

    Verify same-ID records in two tenants, forbidden cross-tenant reads/updates/deletes, distinct cache keys, missing-context rejection, …

    line 84

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 5 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Multi-Tenancy

Treat tenant identity as an authorization boundary, not a query convenience.

Choose an isolation model

  • Database per tenant: strongest isolation and highest operational cost.
  • Schema per tenant: strong logical isolation with shared infrastructure.
  • Shared schema with tenant_id: simplest operations, but every access path must enforce scope.
  • Document the selected model and prohibit repositories from bypassing it.

Resolve tenant identity

  • Derive the tenant from a verified token claim, trusted host mapping, or authenticated API key.
  • Reject missing, unknown, disabled, or conflicting tenant identifiers.
  • Never trust a public X-Tenant-Id header by itself.
  • Clear servlet thread-local context in finally; use Reactor Context for reactive flows.

Enforce isolation

  • Apply tenant selection before opening the persistence session or transaction.
  • Include tenant identity in unique constraints, cache keys, idempotency keys, and object storage paths.
  • Prevent cross-tenant joins and unrestricted administrative repositories.
  • Authorize support impersonation explicitly and audit every use.

Operations

  • Run migrations per database/schema with resumable progress and version reporting.
  • Propagate tenant identity into scheduled jobs, messages, and async tasks explicitly.
  • Limit noisy tenants with quotas and per-tenant observability using bounded identifiers.
  • Test negative cross-tenant access, not only successful tenant queries.

Examples

  • See examples/good-tenant-filter.java and examples/bad-tenant-filter.java.

Executable shared-schema example

The TenantOrderStore and schema implement tenant-scoped reads, creates, updates and deletes. This example uses blocking JDBC, a verified resource-server JWT and an active-tenant registry. It is not a database/schema-routing or reactive implementation. Preserve the application's existing ID types and isolation model rather than copying this UUID model indiscriminately.

Wire TenantScopeFilter into the security chain before AuthorizationFilter (after bearer authentication and exception translation). Supply a RequestMatcher for only the tenant-protected routes and a server-side predicate checking the tenant registry. Instantiate the filter inside the chain configuration, or disable its servlet auto-registration if it is a bean, so it does not run twice. Missing authentication is 401; missing, disabled or unknown tenant membership is 403. Do not read a public tenant header.

The verified tenant_id claim must be issued under a trusted tenant-membership policy; where revocation must take effect before token expiry, consult current membership as well as the active-tenant registry. Background jobs must similarly re-authorize tenant activity/membership at execution time. A captured ID is context propagation, not perpetual authorization.

TenantContext scopes work with try/finally cleanup, preserves nested scopes and provides tenant-qualified cache keys:

TenantId tenant = TenantAccess.resolve(authentication, tenantRegistry::isActive);
try (var scope = TenantContext.open(tenant)) {
    store.find(orderId);
    String key = TenantContext.orderCacheKey(orderId);
    executor.execute(TenantContext.capture(() -> store.find(orderId)));
}

Open the tenant scope before invoking a separate transactional service proxy. The example does not propagate a transaction or SecurityContext to the worker; it starts its own unit of work. Do not use InheritableThreadLocal with pooled workers. Servlet async dispatches need explicit context propagation too. Scope every list, join and native query, and include tenant_id in child foreign keys. No Java repository wrapper protects against arbitrary unscoped SQL: restrict database credentials and consider PostgreSQL row-level security as defense in depth.

Verify same-ID records in two tenants, forbidden cross-tenant reads/updates/deletes, distinct cache keys, missing-context rejection, exception cleanup and sequential jobs on one worker.

Verification scope

The repository fixture targets Boot 3.5.16 with Java 17/21 and checks PostgreSQL 16 shared-schema access and blocking thread context; not Hibernate schema routing or Reactor. Check the coverage matrix before treating another minor version or an illustrative snippet as verified.

Gotchas

  • Agent trusts a tenant header supplied by the caller - derive tenant from authenticated context.
  • Agent forgets to clear a servlet ThreadLocal - pooled threads can leak one tenant into another request.
  • Agent scopes database queries but not cache keys - cached data can cross tenants.
  • Agent starts a transaction before selecting the tenant - routing may choose the wrong database.
  • Agent runs background jobs without tenant context - make tenant an explicit job parameter.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.