agentleFS
rrezartprebrezarrezartprebreza/spring-boot-skills/skills/spring-boot-3/event-driven-messaging/SKILL.md

event-driven-messaging

Skill344 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub

Use when implementing Kafka, RabbitMQ, Pulsar, or JMS producers and consumers in Spring Boot 3. Covers event contracts, idempotency, retries, dead-letter handling, ordering, and outbox delivery.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

10 rules. About 0 are common, 9 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈9

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Use an immutable event envelope with eventId, eventType, occurredAt, schemaVersion, and payload.

    line 14
  2. Distinctive:

    Treat published schemas as APIs.

    line 15
  3. Distinctive:

    Put correlation and causation IDs in headers or the envelope.

    line 16
  4. Distinctive:

    Do not publish JPA entities or framework-specific serialization shapes.

    line 17
  5. Distinctive:

    Use a transactional outbox when database state and broker publication must agree.

    line 22
  6. Distinctive:

    Use deterministic partition keys when per-aggregate ordering matters.

    line 23
  7. Distinctive:

    Keep the transaction boundary around the state change and idempotency marker.

    line 29
  8. Distinctive:

    Test serialization compatibility and handler idempotency.

    line 36
  9. Distinctive:

    Use Testcontainers for broker integration tests.

    line 37
  10. Distinctive:

    Test duplicate, reordered, delayed, and poison messages.

    line 38

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Event-Driven Messaging

Design for at-least-once delivery unless the complete system proves stronger semantics.

Event contract

  • Use an immutable event envelope with eventId, eventType, occurredAt, schemaVersion, and payload.
  • Treat published schemas as APIs. Add fields compatibly and never silently change meaning.
  • Put correlation and causation IDs in headers or the envelope.
  • Do not publish JPA entities or framework-specific serialization shapes.

Producer rules

  • Publish only after the originating state change is durable.
  • Use a transactional outbox when database state and broker publication must agree.
  • Use deterministic partition keys when per-aggregate ordering matters.
  • Configure delivery timeout and acknowledgements explicitly.

Consumer rules

  • Make handlers idempotent with a durable processed-event record or naturally idempotent write.
  • Keep the transaction boundary around the state change and idempotency marker.
  • Classify transient and permanent failures before configuring retries.
  • Bound retries with backoff, then route poison messages to a dead-letter destination.
  • Preserve the original event, failure reason, and attempt count for replay.

Testing

  • Test serialization compatibility and handler idempotency.
  • Use Testcontainers for broker integration tests.
  • Test duplicate, reordered, delayed, and poison messages.

Examples

  • See examples/good-consumer.java and examples/bad-consumer.java.

Gotchas

  • Agent assumes exactly-once delivery because the broker supports transactions - end-to-end side effects still need idempotency.
  • Agent retries validation failures forever - dead-letter permanent failures promptly.
  • Agent publishes inside a database transaction without an outbox - a crash can split state and event delivery.
  • Agent uses a random partition key - ordering for one aggregate is then lost.
  • Agent deserializes directly into a JPA entity - use a versioned event contract.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.