context-window-engineer
Skill75 starsChanged 38 days agoMITView on GitHub
Expert guide for engineering and optimizing ultra-large context windows (2M+ tokens) across Gemini 4 Pro, Claude 5.5, and GPT Astra 6 — context partitioning, retrieval-augmented context injection, sliding window strategies, and cost-aware token budgeting / Panduan ahli rekayasa dan optimasi context window ultra-besar (2M+ token) di Gemini 4 Pro, Claude 5.5, dan GPT Astra 6 — partisi konteks, injeksi konteks berbasis retrieval, strategi sliding window, dan penganggaran token sadar-biaya.
In this repository149 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- .cursor/rules/vibes-plug-core.mdcCursor rule
- accessibility-testing-expertSkill
- adaptive-model-cascadeSkill
- affective-computing-emotion-aiSkill
- agentic-coding-workflow-expertSkill
- agentic-memory-architectSkill
- agentic-micro-economy-architectSkill
- ai-code-review-autonomousSkill
- ai-llm-integration-expertSkill
- ai-media-generation-expertSkill
- ai-prompt-engineering-expertSkill
- ai-safety-governance-expertSkill
- angular-expertSkill
- anti-slopSkill
- api-design-expertSkill
- api-gateway-proxy-expertSkill
- app-analyzer-optimizerSkill
- apple-ecosystem-expertSkill
- app-promo-media-expertSkill
- astro-framework-expertSkill
- async-queue-temporal-expertSkill
- authentication-identity-expertSkill
- autonomous-api-drift-healerSkill
- autonomous-red-teamerSkill
- autonomous-tdd-debuggerSkill
- biome-linter-formatter-expertSkill
- blockchain-web3-expertSkill
- brainstormingSkill
- browser-automation-expertSkill
- bun-runtime-expertSkill
- chatbot-messaging-expertSkill
- ci-cd-devops-architectSkill
- cloud-hosting-expertSkill
- coderabbitSkill
- compliance-gdpr-privacy-expertSkill
- composable-mach-architectSkill
- cron-scheduler-expertSkill
- database-orm-expertSkill
- data-pipeline-etl-expertSkill
- data-telemetry-expertSkill
- data-visualization-expertSkill
- deep-research-analystSkill
- dependency-upgrade-migratorSkill
- design-system-architectSkill
- desktop-electron-expertSkill
- documentation-site-expertSkill
- doku-mcp-serverSkill
- doku-payment-gatewaySkill
- domain-driven-design-expertSkill
- e2e-testing-expertSkill
- ecommerce-expertSkill
- email-notification-expertSkill
- ephemeral-generative-ui-architectSkill
- ephemeral-wasm-sandbox-executorSkill
- error-resilience-expertSkill
- event-driven-architectSkill
- feature-flag-analytics-expertSkill
- file-upload-media-expertSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈3
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 47
Never treat the context window as a flat buffer.
- Distinctive: line 145
Needle Placement: Place the most critical context at the very beginning (Zone 1-2) and very end (Zone 5) of the prompt.
- Very specific: line 146
Structural Anchors: Use explicit section headers (=== CRITICAL: Database Schema ===) to create attention anchors.
- Very specific: line 201
Always Count Tokens Before Injection: Use tiktoken (OpenAI), @anthropic-ai/tokenizer, or Gemini's countTokens() API to measure actual token …
- Distinctive: line 204
Degrade Gracefully: When context exceeds budget, drop Zone 4 (older history) first, then Zone 3 (retrieved context), never Zone 1-2.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
context-window-engineer — vibes-plug Skill
English | Bahasa Indonesia
<a name="english"></a>
English
Orchestration & Integration
Connects and orchestrates with kv-cache-prefix-optimizer, llm-finops-router, frontier-ai-models-expert, gemini-agent-booster, ai-llm-integration-expert, vercel-ai-sdk-expert, adaptive-model-cascade, session-memory-manager, and deep-research-analyst to ensure context windows are utilized efficiently across all AI-powered workflows.
Description
Production guide for engineering, partitioning, and optimizing ultra-large context windows (128k → 2M+ tokens) across frontier models. Prevents the most common failure mode in 2026 AI applications: dumping raw data into context without structure, causing degraded recall, wasted tokens, and hallucination amplification in the "lost in the middle" zone.
Trigger Conditions
Activate this skill when:
- Building AI agents or applications that consume >50k tokens of context per request.
- Experiencing degraded model recall, "lost in the middle" failures, or hallucinations in long-context scenarios.
- Architecting Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems that need to decide between retrieval vs. long-context stuffing.
- Optimizing token costs for applications with large system prompts, tool registries, or codebase context maps.
- Designing multi-turn agentic loops where context accumulates across dozens of turns.
Core Concepts & Patterns
1. Context Window Capacity Map (October 2026)
| Model | Max Context | Effective Recall Zone | Cost per 1M Input Tokens | Cache Discount |
| Gemini 4 Pro | 2,097,152 | ~1.8M (reliable) | $1.25 | 75% (explicit cache) |
| Gemini 4 Flash | 1,048,576 | ~900k | $0.075 | 75% |
| Claude 5.5 Opus | 500,000 | ~450k | $15.00 | 90% (prompt cache) |
| Claude 5.5 Sonnet | 200,000 | ~180k | $3.00 | 90% |
| GPT Astra 6 | 256,000 | ~220k | $5.00 | 50% (prefix cache) |
2. The Context Partitioning Architecture
Never treat the context window as a flat buffer. Partition it into semantically meaningful zones with explicit priority ordering:
┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ ZONE 1: IMMUTABLE SYSTEM DIRECTIVES (1-3%) │
│ System prompt, behavioral guardrails, output format │
│ ► NEVER changes mid-session │
├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ ZONE 2: STATIC REFERENCE CONTEXT (10-40%) │
│ Codebase schemas, API specs, tool definitions, │
│ architectural docs, PRD excerpts │
│ ► Changes only between sessions │
├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ ZONE 3: RETRIEVED CONTEXT (20-50%) │
│ RAG chunks, relevant code files, search results, │
│ documentation snippets │
│ ► Dynamically injected per query via retrieval │
├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ ZONE 4: CONVERSATION HISTORY (10-30%) │
│ Prior turns, summarized older context, │
│ tool call results │
│ ► Sliding window with intelligent summarization │
├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ ZONE 5: ACTIVE QUERY + SCRATCHPAD (1-5%) │
│ Current user message, chain-of-thought workspace │
│ ► Most volatile, always at the tail │
└──────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘3. Token Budget Allocation (TypeScript Implementation)
export interface ContextBudget {
totalCapacity: number;
zones: {
systemDirectives: { maxTokens: number; priority: 1 };
staticReference: { maxTokens: number; priority: 2 };
retrievedContext: { maxTokens: number; priority: 3 };
conversationHistory: { maxTokens: number; priority: 4 };
activeQuery: { maxTokens: number; priority: 5 };
};
}
export function createBudget(modelCapacity: number): ContextBudget {
return {
totalCapacity: modelCapacity,
zones: {
systemDirectives: { maxTokens: Math.floor(modelCapacity * 0.02), priority: 1 },
staticReference: { maxTokens: Math.floor(modelCapacity * 0.30), priority: 2 },
retrievedContext: { maxTokens: Math.floor(modelCapacity * 0.40), priority: 3 },
conversationHistory: { maxTokens: Math.floor(modelCapacity * 0.25), priority: 4 },
activeQuery: { maxTokens: Math.floor(modelCapacity * 0.03), priority: 5 },
},
};
}
export function enforceTokenBudget(
zoneContents: Map<string, string>,
budget: ContextBudget,
tokenCounter: (text: string) => number
): Map<string, string> {
const result = new Map<string, string>();
const zones = Object.entries(budget.zones).sort(([, a], [, b]) => a.priority - b.priority);
for (const [zoneName, { maxTokens }] of zones) {
const content = zoneContents.get(zoneName) ?? '';
const tokenCount = tokenCounter(content);
if (tokenCount <= maxTokens) {
result.set(zoneName, content);
} else {
result.set(zoneName, truncateToTokenLimit(content, maxTokens, tokenCounter));
}
}
return result;
}
function truncateToTokenLimit(
content: string,
maxTokens: number,
tokenCounter: (text: string) => number
): string {
const lines = content.split('\n');
let accumulated = '';
for (const line of lines) {
const candidate = accumulated ? `${accumulated}\n${line}` : line;
if (tokenCounter(candidate) > maxTokens) break;
accumulated = candidate;
}
return accumulated;
}4. "Lost in the Middle" Mitigation
Frontier models exhibit degraded recall for information positioned in the middle 40-60% of the context. Mitigate with:
- Needle Placement: Place the most critical context at the very beginning (Zone 1-2) and very end (Zone 5) of the prompt.
- Structural Anchors: Use explicit section headers (
=== CRITICAL: Database Schema ===) to create attention anchors. - Redundant Summarization: For critical facts, include both the raw data AND a summary at the top.
- Chunked Retrieval: Break large documents into semantically coherent chunks (512-1024 tokens each) rather than inserting monolithic blocks.
5. RAG vs. Long-Context Decision Matrix
| Criterion | Use RAG (Retrieve & Inject) | Use Long-Context Stuffing |
| Corpus size | >10M tokens total corpus | <2M tokens total corpus |
| Query specificity | Narrow, focused queries | Broad, synthesis-oriented queries |
| Freshness | Corpus updates frequently | Corpus is static per session |
| Cost sensitivity | High (pay only for retrieved chunks) | Lower priority (amortized via cache) |
| Recall requirement | Precision-critical (top-k retrieval) | Recall-critical (need full picture) |
6. Sliding Window Strategy for Multi-Turn Agents
export interface TurnSummary {
turnIndex: number;
role: 'user' | 'assistant';
summary: string;
tokenCount: number;
fullContent?: string;
}
export function buildSlidingWindow(
allTurns: TurnSummary[],
maxHistoryTokens: number,
recentTurnsToKeepFull: number = 4
): string[] {
const recentFull = allTurns.slice(-recentTurnsToKeepFull);
const older = allTurns.slice(0, -recentTurnsToKeepFull);
let budget = maxHistoryTokens;
const output: string[] = [];
for (const turn of recentFull) {
const content = turn.fullContent ?? turn.summary;
budget -= turn.tokenCount;
output.push(content);
}
if (budget > 0 && older.length > 0) {
const olderSummaries = older.map((t) => `[Turn ${t.turnIndex}] ${t.summary}`);
output.unshift(`=== SUMMARIZED EARLIER CONTEXT ===\n${olderSummaries.join('\n')}`);
}
return output;
}Best Practices
- Always Count Tokens Before Injection: Use
tiktoken(OpenAI),@anthropic-ai/tokenizer, or Gemini'scountTokens()API to measure actual token counts. - Cache-Align Zone Boundaries: Coordinate with
kv-cache-prefix-optimizerso static zones (1-2) align with KV-cache prefix boundaries. - Measure Recall Quality: Instrument needle-in-haystack tests at various context depths to validate your model's effective recall zone.
- Degrade Gracefully: When context exceeds budget, drop Zone 4 (older history) first, then Zone 3 (retrieved context), never Zone 1-2.
- Monitor Token Spend Per Zone: Log per-zone token consumption to
data-telemetry-expertdashboards to identify context bloat early.
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
| Anti-Pattern | Consequence | Remedy |
| Dumping entire codebase into context | Exceeds effective recall zone, hallucination spikes | Use targeted retrieval + file relevance scoring |
| No zone partitioning | Critical instructions get "lost in the middle" | Implement explicit zone headers and priority ordering |
| Ignoring token counting | Silent context truncation by model API | Pre-count and enforce budgets client-side |
| Keeping full conversation history forever | Context fills up after 10-15 turns | Implement sliding window with summarization |
Integration with Other Skills (MANDATORY)
kv-cache-prefix-optimizer— Ensure Zone 1-2 boundaries align with cache-pinned prefixes for maximum cache hit rates.llm-finops-router— Feed per-zone token costs to the FinOps dashboard for budget optimization.frontier-ai-models-expert— Reference model-specific context window capacities and recall characteristics.adaptive-model-cascade— Route to larger-context models only when context exceeds smaller model capacity.gemini-agent-booster— Leverage Gemini 4 Pro's native 2M context caching for zero-latency re-reads.session-memory-manager— Persist context zone snapshots across sessions for seamless handoff.
Referenced By Orchestrators (MANDATORY)
brainstorming— Added to "AI & LLM Integration" and "Frontier AI & Simulation" matrix rows.zero-to-prod-orchestrator— Integrated in Phase 4 (Backend APIs, Microservices & AI Agents).
<a name="bahasa-indonesia"></a>
Bahasa Indonesia
Integrasi Orkestrasi
Terhubung dan mengorkestrasi dengan kv-cache-prefix-optimizer, llm-finops-router, frontier-ai-models-expert, gemini-agent-booster, ai-llm-integration-expert, vercel-ai-sdk-expert, adaptive-model-cascade, session-memory-manager, dan deep-research-analyst untuk memastikan context window dimanfaatkan secara efisien di seluruh alur kerja berbasis AI.
Deskripsi
Panduan produksi untuk merekayasa, mempartisi, dan mengoptimalkan context window ultra-besar (128k → 2M+ token) pada model frontier. Mencegah kegagalan paling umum di aplikasi AI 2026: memasukkan data mentah ke konteks tanpa struktur, yang menyebabkan recall menurun, token terbuang, dan amplifikasi halusinasi di zona "lost in the middle".
Kondisi Pemicu
Aktifkan skill ini ketika:
- Membangun agen atau aplikasi AI yang mengonsumsi >50k token konteks per permintaan.
- Mengalami penurunan recall model, kegagalan "lost in the middle", atau halusinasi pada skenario konteks panjang.
- Merancang sistem RAG yang perlu memutuskan antara retrieval vs. long-context stuffing.
- Mengoptimalkan biaya token untuk aplikasi dengan system prompt besar, registri tool, atau peta konteks codebase.
Konsep Inti & Pola Praktik
1. Arsitektur Partisi Konteks
Jangan perlakukan context window sebagai buffer datar. Partisi menjadi zona bermakna secara semantik:
- Zona 1 (1-3%): Direktif sistem yang tidak berubah — prompt perilaku, format output.
- Zona 2 (10-40%): Referensi statis — skema codebase, spesifikasi API, definisi tool.
- Zona 3 (20-50%): Konteks yang di-retrieve — chunk RAG, file kode relevan, cuplikan dokumentasi.
- Zona 4 (10-30%): Riwayat percakapan — giliran sebelumnya, ringkasan konteks lama.
- Zona 5 (1-5%): Query aktif — pesan pengguna saat ini, ruang kerja chain-of-thought.
2. Mitigasi "Lost in the Middle"
Model frontier menunjukkan recall yang menurun untuk informasi di tengah-tengah konteks. Mitigasi dengan penempatan informasi kritis di awal dan akhir, jangkar struktural, ringkasan redundan, dan retrieval berbasis chunk.
3. Keputusan RAG vs. Long-Context
Gunakan RAG untuk korpus >10M token dengan query spesifik dan sensitivitas biaya tinggi. Gunakan long-context stuffing untuk korpus <2M token dengan kebutuhan sintesis luas dan corpus statis per sesi.
Praktik Terbaik
- Selalu Hitung Token Sebelum Injeksi: Gunakan API
countTokens()untuk mengukur jumlah token aktual. - Selaraskan Batas Zona dengan Cache: Koordinasikan dengan
kv-cache-prefix-optimizeragar zona statis selaras dengan batas prefix KV-cache. - Ukur Kualitas Recall: Instrumenkan tes needle-in-haystack pada berbagai kedalaman konteks.
- Degradasi Anggun: Saat konteks melebihi anggaran, buang Zona 4 (riwayat lama) lebih dulu, bukan Zona 1-2.
Jebakan Umum yang Harus Dihindari
| Praktik Buruk | Dampak | Solusi |
| Memasukkan seluruh codebase ke konteks | Melebihi zona recall efektif, halusinasi melonjak | Gunakan retrieval terarah + skor relevansi file |
| Tanpa partisi zona | Instruksi kritis "hilang di tengah" | Implementasikan header zona eksplisit |
| Mengabaikan penghitungan token | Pemotongan konteks diam-diam oleh API model | Hitung dan terapkan anggaran dari sisi klien |
| Menyimpan seluruh riwayat percakapan | Konteks penuh setelah 10-15 giliran | Terapkan sliding window dengan ringkasan |
Integrasi dengan Skill Lain (WAJIB)
kv-cache-prefix-optimizer— Pastikan batas Zona 1-2 selaras dengan prefix cache untuk cache hit rate maksimal.llm-finops-router— Kirim biaya token per-zona ke dashboard FinOps untuk optimasi anggaran.frontier-ai-models-expert— Referensi kapasitas context window dan karakteristik recall spesifik model.adaptive-model-cascade— Rutekan ke model berkonteks lebih besar hanya ketika konteks melebihi kapasitas model kecil.
Direferensikan oleh Orchestrator (WAJIB)
brainstorming— Ditambahkan ke baris "Integrasi AI & LLM" dan "Frontier AI & Simulation" pada Matriks Orkestrasi.zero-to-prod-orchestrator— Diintegrasikan di Fase 4 (Backend APIs, Microservices & AI Agents).
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

