incident-response
Skill0 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
Handle production incidents with structured triage, communication, and blameless postmortems. Covers severity classification, rollback decisions, stakeholder updates, and follow-up issue creation.
- Commits and pushes
81 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- anuragsarkar97/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- tigu77/tiguclawtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- darkweb19/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- mdigital94/vibe-shield-plugintheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- nisarth/claude-skills-storetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- aymardkouakou/claude-gh-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use dora-metrics, background-jobs and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
jholhewresSkilldora-metrics
Calculate DORA metrics from git + deploy logs
Also in 3 projects that use this
YepAPISkillbackground-jobs
Queue workers with BullMQ/Inngest/Trigger.dev, job retries, dead letter queues, concurrency.
Also in 4 projects that use this
MicrosoftSkilldata-modeling
Use when the app needs to store or read data — records, a database, entities, CRUD, lists, "save/remember X", or per-user data with row-level security. This app's data layer is Rayfin's: you declare entities as TypeScript classes with decorators in rayfin/data/, register them in the schema, and read/write them through the typed rayfin-client. Covers: defining an @entity, field decorators, registering it, per-entity access with @role, owner-only row-level security, and the client query/mutation API. Triggers: data, database, model, entity, schema, table, record, CRUD, create, read, update, delete, list, store, save, persist, per-user, row-level security, RLS, access control, ownership.
Also in 7 projects that use this
YepAPISkilldata-pipelines
ETL patterns, cron scheduling, queue-based processing, and batch jobs with Inngest/BullMQ.
Also in 4 projects that use this
mmondoraSkillinfrastructure-as-code
Infrastructure as Code with Terraform and Pulumi. State management, modularity, drift detection, secrets handling. Use when provisioning cloud resources, writing Terraform/Pulumi modules, or managing infrastructure configuration.
Also in 5 projects that use this
csiddhant796-blipSkillthreat-detection
Use when hunting for threats in an environment, analyzing IOCs, or detecting behavioral anomalies in telemetry. Covers hypothesis-driven threat hunting, IOC sweep generation, z-score anomaly detection, and MITRE ATT&CK-mapped signal prioritization.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions81 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 81
- anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins★ 35ksame name
- microsoft/hve-core★ 1.6ksame name
- hypnguyen1209/offensive-claude★ 401same name
- duyet/clickhouse-monitoring★ 303same name
- kid-sid/claude-spellbook★ 190same name
- irahardianto/awesome-agv★ 157same name
- harness/harness-skills★ 127same name
- nahid-sparktales/agent-dispatcher★ 59same name
- Happy-Technologies-LLC/happy-platform-skills★ 41same name
- drafthq/draft★ 40same name
71 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository44 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- a11y-auditSkill
- ai-engineerSkill
- api-clientSkill
- changelog-enforcerSkill
- code-cleanup-guardianSkill
- code-reviewerSkill
- contract-testSkill
- db-migrateSkill
- dep-auditSkill
- devops-automatorSkill
- env-configSkill
- error-observabilitySkill
- frontend-designSkill
- git-commit-helperSkill
- github-issues-managerSkill
- git-issue-syncSkill
- git-protocolSkill
- handoffSkill
- init-projectSkill
- karpathy-guidelinesSkill
- market-researcherSkill
- parallel-agent-git-isolationSkill
- product-strategistSkill
- pr-workflowSkill
- rapid-builderSkill
- release-managerSkill
- resumeSkill
- scrutinizeSkill
- shadcn-uiSkill
- skill-builderSkill
- sprint-plannerSkill
- state-machine-diagramsSkill
- state-managementSkill
- surveySkill
- system-architectSkill
- tech-docsSkill
- unstuckSkill
- ux-design-systemSkill
- ux-researchSkill
- webapp-testingSkill
- web-dev-fundamentalsSkill
- workflow-optimizerSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 68 edited versions we read keep these.
4
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 25
When did it start? (check monitoring, recent deployments)
- Distinctive: line 70
After resolution, conduct a blameless postmortem within 48 hours.
- Distinctive: line 73
Never blame individuals — focus on systems and processes
- Distinctive: line 74
Every postmortem produces at least 2 action items with GitHub Issues
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 68 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Incident Response & Postmortem
Severity Classification
| Severity | Impact | Response Time | Examples |
| SEV-1 | Service down, data loss, security breach | Immediate | Production database unreachable, auth bypass, data corruption |
| SEV-2 | Major feature broken, significant user impact | < 1 hour | Payments failing, login broken for subset of users |
| SEV-3 | Minor feature degraded, workaround exists | < 4 hours | Slow search, email notifications delayed |
| SEV-4 | Cosmetic, minimal impact | Next business day | UI glitch, non-critical log errors |
Incident Response Protocol
Phase 1: Assess (first 5 minutes)
- What is broken? (symptom, not cause)
- Who is affected? (all users, subset, internal only)
- When did it start? (check monitoring, recent deployments)
- What changed recently? (
git log --oneline -10, recent deploys)
Phase 2: Decide — Fix Forward or Roll Back
Was there a recent deployment?
├── Yes → Does reverting the deploy fix the issue?
│ ├── Yes → ROLL BACK immediately
│ └── No → Fix forward (the deploy isn't the cause)
└── No → Fix forward (investigate root cause)Rollback: revert the deploy, not just the newest commit. git revert HEAD undoes one commit and fails outright on a merge commit.
git checkout prod && git pull
git log --oneline --first-parent -5 # find the deploy's commit(s)
git revert -m 1 <merge-sha> # deploy landed as a merge commit
# or: git revert --no-edit <last-good-sha>..HEAD # deploy was several plain commits
git push origin prod # confirm with the user first: this redeploys productionPhase 3: Mitigate
- Apply the smallest change that stops the bleeding
- This is NOT the final fix — it's a bandage
- Accept technical debt temporarily to restore service
Phase 4: Communicate
Status update template:
[INCIDENT] [SEV-X] [Service Name]
Status: Investigating | Identified | Monitoring | Resolved
Impact: [who is affected and how]
Start time: [when it began]
Current action: [what we're doing right now]
Next update: [when to expect the next update]Phase 5: Resolve and Verify
- Confirm the fix resolves the root cause (not just the symptom)
- Monitor for recurrence (15 min, 1 hour, 24 hours)
- Mark incident as resolved only after monitoring period
Blameless Postmortem
After resolution, conduct a blameless postmortem within 48 hours. Use the postmortem template.
Rules
- Never blame individuals — focus on systems and processes
- Every postmortem produces at least 2 action items with GitHub Issues
- Action items must have owners and deadlines
- Share postmortems with the team — learning is the goal
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

