agentleFS
robium-airobium-ai/robium/skills/ros2/SKILL.md

ros2

Skill93 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub

Build and debug robot software whose runtime interfaces use ROS 2.

2 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

6 rules. About 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈4

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Treat ROS 2 as a live distributed graph.

    line 8
  2. Very specific:

    Run rosdep after a fresh clone or dependency change, before interpreting a build failure as a source bug.

    line 17
  3. Distinctive:

    Prefer an overlay package or launch-time wiring over editing an installed third-party package.

    line 19
  4. Distinctive:

    Use topics for streams, services for bounded requests, and actions for long-running goals with feedback and cancellation.

    line 36
  5. Distinctive:

    When callbacks block or unexpectedly serialize, read concurrency before adding executor threads.

    line 48
  6. Very specific:

    Use the bundled ament_python example only when a complete minimal package is useful.

    line 53

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

ROS 2

Treat ROS 2 as a live distributed graph. Inspect the graph that is actually running before changing source code.

Establish the environment

  • Identify the repository's ROS distro, RMW implementation, workspace, and ROS_DOMAIN_ID; do not substitute catalog-wide defaults.
  • Source the underlay before the workspace overlay. A fresh shell is a fresh environment.
  • Run rosdep after a fresh clone or dependency change, before interpreting a build failure as a source bug.
  • Prefer an overlay package or launch-time wiring over editing an installed third-party package.

Inspect the boundary that failed

  • Build: separate missing dependencies, package metadata, and stale build artifacts from compiler or application failures.
  • Launch: resolve the final arguments, parameters, namespaces, and remaps; do not reason only from a launch file's defaults.
  • Graph: confirm that the expected nodes and endpoints exist and that names include the namespace you expect.
  • Messages: compare publisher and subscriber types and QoS. Discovery without data is often an interface mismatch, especially for sensor topics.
  • Time and transforms: confirm a single time source and a connected, current TF path before debugging downstream behavior.
  • Lifecycle: distinguish an inactive node from a missing or crashed node.

Use topics for streams, services for bounded requests, and actions for long-running goals with feedback and cancellation. Choose based on semantics, not convenience.

Go deeper only when needed

  • For workspace layout, package anatomy, overlays, and rosdep, read workspace and packages.
  • For launch composition, parameters, includes, remaps, and relays, read launch patterns.
  • For topics, services, actions, QoS, and TF fundamentals, read interfaces and QoS.
  • When callbacks block or unexpectedly serialize, read concurrency before adding executor threads.
  • For a failing command or silent graph, read failures and then the fuller debugging guide if necessary.
  • For Create 3 and TurtleBot 4 evidence, read TurtleBot 4.
  • Use the bundled ament_python example only when a complete minimal package is useful; re-check its APIs against the project's distro.

Cross into navigation, gazebo, or a visualization skill only after ROS 2 evidence shows that their boundary is receiving valid data. Cross into integration when the failure is between processes, containers, or non-ROS systems; use environments when the runtime itself is not reproducible.

Done

  • The intended nodes and endpoints exist under the expected names.
  • QoS, time, and TF contracts are compatible at every changed boundary.
  • A message, service response, or action result proves the real interface, not merely that processes started.
  • Version-sensitive syntax was checked against the project's ROS distro and current ROS 2 documentation.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.