lerobot
Skill93 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
Build and debug LeRobot datasets, training, and policy evaluation. For a first pretrained robot-arm demo, start with architect's reference-app selection.
In this repository32 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- learnings/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- learnings/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- skills/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- app-publishingSkill
- architectSkill
- cloud-runSkill
- dataSkill
- environmentsSkill
- foxgloveSkill
- gazeboSkill
- gemini-roboticsSkill
- huggingfaceSkill
- integrationSkill
- isaac-labSkill
- isaac-simSkill
- learning-loopSkill
- live-demoSkill
- miningSkill
- mujocoSkill
- navigationSkill
- rerunSkill
- ros2Skill
- runpodSkill
- rviz2Skill
- simulationSkill
- skill-authorSkill
- test-assetsSkill
- testingSkill
- visualizationSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
8 rules. About 0 are common, 8 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈8
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 8
Follow one contract chain through LeRobot: embodiment, dataset, processor, checkpoint, runtime observations and actions, then evaluation.
- Distinctive: line 17
If selection already happened, continue here.
- Distinctive: line 28
Keep Hub identity, transfer, publication, and Jobs lifecycle at the Hugging Face boundary.
- Distinctive: line 33
Start with a small shipped policy and a known dataset/environment pair.
- Distinctive: line 34
Run a short train that writes a checkpoint, then load that exact checkpoint through evaluation.
- Distinctive: line 39
Treat real-hardware rollout as a new safety boundary even when simulation evaluation passed.
- Distinctive: line 51
When a checkpoint, feature contract, evaluation worker, dependency, or remote run fails, start with FAILURES.md.
- Distinctive: line 56
Use the current LeRobot documentation and source for version-sensitive APIs and the shipped policy/environment list.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
LeRobot
Follow one contract chain through LeRobot: embodiment, dataset, processor, checkpoint, runtime observations and actions, then evaluation. Find the first contract that does not match.
Establish the contract
- For a new manipulation app or first pretrained-policy demo, read architect before creating an environment or training pipeline. It finds the saved apps checkout and selects a compatible baseline. If selection already happened, continue here. Existing dataset, training, or evaluation work does not need onboarding; an inference-only request does not authorize training.
- Inspect the installed LeRobot version and current CLI help before writing flags. Dataset formats, policy families, scripts, and extras change quickly.
- Match the robot's state, action space, cameras, rates, and task to the dataset. A policy adapts to those features; it cannot repair a mismatched embodiment.
- Inspect every checkpoint's configuration and processor files, not only its weights. Base and fine-tuned checkpoints from one family can expect different camera layouts.
- Keep Hub identity, transfer, publication, and Jobs lifecycle at the Hugging Face boundary. Keep source-selection strategy in data.
Prove the loop cheaply
- Start with a small shipped policy and a known dataset/environment pair.
- Run a short train that writes a checkpoint, then load that exact checkpoint through evaluation. Completion and numeric metrics are the smoke-test result; policy quality is not.
- Confirm loss, saved processors, input/output shapes, rollout metrics, and video or real-robot behavior before increasing steps or hardware cost.
- Treat real-hardware rollout as a new safety boundary even when simulation evaluation passed.
Go deeper only when needed
- For loading, recording, editing, migration, and episode visualization, read references/datasets.md.
- For policy choice, camera remapping, training, compute sizing, and remote Jobs behavior, read references/policies-and-training.md.
- For simulation evaluation, headless rendering, EnvHub, or real-hardware rollout, read references/eval-and-sim.md.
- When a checkpoint, feature contract, evaluation worker, dependency, or remote run fails, start with FAILURES.md.
- The concrete PushT examples are useful only when that smoke path matches the application: load dataset and train ACT.
- Use the current LeRobot documentation and source for version-sensitive APIs and the shipped policy/environment list.
Done
- The target dataset loads, the checkpoint carries its processors, evaluation exercises matching observations and actions, and measured results justify any longer run or hardware deployment.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

