agentleFS
robium-airobium-ai/robium/skills/data/SKILL.md

data

Skill93 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub

Choose and structure training data for robot-learning projects.

16 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use content, frontend and 6 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • Rayan55050Skill

    content

    Создание контента: посты, статьи, тексты

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • imehrSkill

    frontend

    Use when building UI components, pages, or features - guides Claude through the approved frontend stack (Next.js 15, React 19, Shadcn, Tailwind) with design-first workflow for complex UIs, enforcing patterns and quality standards

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • ryu111Skill

    browser

    agent-browser CLI 瀏覽器自動化指南。E2E 測試、UI 調試、設計驗證。適用於需要實際操作瀏覽器的場景。

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • alxyrginSkill

    writing

    Создание контента для личного бренда — статьи, посты, туториалы. Use when user asks to "напиши статью", "создай пост", "подготовь контент", "write article", "create content", or when task requires content creation for blogging, LinkedIn, Medium, or other publishing platforms.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • 0xSeroSkill

    security

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • NVIDIASkill

    github

    Interact with GitHub using the gh CLI restricted to REST API only (no GraphQL). Use when the user wants to work with GitHub issues, pull requests, repos, releases, or Actions — especially in sandboxed environments where the GraphQL endpoint may be blocked. Trigger keywords - github, gh, pull request, PR, github issue, github actions, workflow, release, gh api.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

8 rules. 0 are common, 8 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 12 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 8

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Search existing datasets first.

    line 13
  2. Distinctive:

    Use an exact embodiment match directly.

    line 15
  3. Distinctive:

    When schemas and task labels cannot distinguish two environments, compare a deterministic scene observation from the dataset with the …

    line 17
  4. Distinctive:

    If a documented search finds no dataset for the exact scene and control contract, generate demonstrations in the pinned application …

    line 22
  5. Distinctive:

    Use Hugging Face guidance only when the decision reaches Hub discovery, inspection, transfer, or publication.

    line 48
  6. Distinctive:

    Use LeRobot guidance when the decision reaches LeRobotDataset recording, editing, training, evaluation, or platform-specific teleoperation …

    line 50
  7. Distinctive:

    Use simulator guidance only after choosing simulation as a source.

    line 52
  8. Distinctive:

    Test fixtures belong to test-assets, not this training-data decision.

    line 54

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 12 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Data

Begin with coverage: decide what behavior, embodiment, and conditions the policy must see before deciding how to collect them.

Choose the source

  • Search existing datasets first. Confirm task, action space, degrees of freedom, gripper, cameras, state features, timing, license, and provenance.
  • Use an exact embodiment match directly. Treat a near match as pretraining or co-training material, not a drop-in dataset.
  • When schemas and task labels cannot distinguish two environments, compare a deterministic scene observation from the dataset with the pinned target environment. Prefer a stable reference camera over a randomized wrist view.
  • Generate in simulation when scale, controlled variation, or labels matter more than perfect realism.
  • If a documented search finds no dataset for the exact scene and control contract, generate demonstrations in the pinned application environment and retain only episodes that satisfy its success condition.
  • Collect on the real robot when contact, appearance, or hardware behavior is difficult to reproduce faithfully.
  • Mix sources deliberately: simulation can provide coverage; a smaller real set can expose the remaining sim-to-real gap.

Protect the useful signal

  • Constrain the task and workspace before adding more episodes. Dense coverage of the behavior matters more than a large headline episode count.
  • For a successful-expert imitation dataset, keep only demonstrations that meet the task's success definition. Retry or discard oracle failures, and stop loudly if the success rate collapses. Do not apply this rule to DAgger, corrective, recovery, or failure-learning datasets that intentionally retain non-expert transitions.
  • Define the episode boundary, observations, actions, rates, success label, splits, and target storage format before collection starts.
  • Record the source revision and collection conditions. Dataset facts and licenses must come from the current card or repository, not memory.

Go deeper only when needed

  • For the Robium evidence behind workspace density and demonstration quality, read COLLECTION-QUALITY.md.
  • Use Hugging Face guidance only when the decision reaches Hub discovery, inspection, transfer, or publication.
  • Use LeRobot guidance when the decision reaches LeRobotDataset recording, editing, training, evaluation, or platform-specific teleoperation controls.
  • Use simulator guidance only after choosing simulation as a source; Isaac Sim and Gazebo own their generation mechanics.
  • Test fixtures belong to test-assets, not this training-data decision.

Done

  • The chosen sources cover the target embodiment and task, the gaps are named, and the first small collection or dataset slice can validate the plan before scale or paid compute.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.