agentleFS
robium-airobium-ai/robium/skills/AGENTS.md

robium / skills

AGENTS.md93 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub

This file applies under skills/. Load skill-author before changing skill content and learning-loop when working from captured evidence. - Only architect needs the full catalog. Other skills name direct neighbors only where work crosses a real boundary. - Live frontmatter contains only name and a short description. - Give each entrypoint one strong organizing idea and keep it human-readable. There is no required section template. - Assume ordinary coding competence. Include only guidance that changes a capable agent's decisions. -…

The file

We split this AGENTS.md into the rules it gives an agent

5 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈3

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Only architect needs the full catalog.

    line 8
  2. Distinctive:

    Put conditional commands, failures, tuning, platform evidence, schemas, and substantial examples in focused support files.

    line 15
  3. Distinctive:

    Keep official upstream documentation authoritative for volatile commands, APIs, packages, and configuration.

    line 18
  4. Very specific:

    Run uv run skills/skill-author/scripts/validate_skills.py once after each coherent batch of live skill changes, not after every file or …

    line 29
  5. Distinctive:

    Use trigger or task evals only when they protect a meaningful routing or behavior regression.

    line 31

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 40,246 AGENTS.md files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
AGENTS.md

Skill guidance

This file applies under skills/. Load skill-author before changing skill content and learning-loop when working from captured evidence.

Keep discovery and context cheap

  • Only architect needs the full catalog. Other skills name direct neighbors only where work crosses a real boundary.
  • Live frontmatter contains only name and a short description.
  • Give each entrypoint one strong organizing idea and keep it human-readable. There is no required section template.
  • Assume ordinary coding competence. Include only guidance that changes a capable agent's decisions.
  • Put conditional commands, failures, tuning, platform evidence, schemas, and substantial examples in focused support files. Link them where they become relevant instead of loading them by default.
  • Keep official upstream documentation authoritative for volatile commands, APIs, packages, and configuration.
  • Preserve exact Robium-observed values with their conditions; never present one application's workaround as a universal default.

Change and review

  • Git history is the normal record of live skill changes. Do not add per-skill versions, changelogs, README files, or archive snapshots.
  • Preserve useful examples and scripts only when they provide reusable value; validate changed executable artifacts proportionally.
  • Run uv run skills/skill-author/scripts/validate_skills.py once after each coherent batch of live skill changes, not after every file or sentence.
  • Use trigger or task evals only when they protect a meaningful routing or behavior regression. Do not test headings or exact prose.
  • Regenerate cli/src/catalog.json after a skill name or description changes.

Robium ships practical robotics knowledge and real reusable examples, not an application framework or invented DSL.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.