decide
Skill20 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
Loaded by repl: answers every question a skill would put to the user during an unattended run. Settled answers are followed, one-way doors pause, experiments settle what they can, and two-way doors are decided and logged.
51 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- aditya-vermax/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- vimkim/my-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- yuri-xyz/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- blamechris/chroxytheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- dirien/yet-another-agent-harnesstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Integralist/agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 6, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use redesign, weekly and 9 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
arjunkshahSkillredesign
Redesign existing interfaces to premium quality while preserving product goals and functional behavior.
Also in 3 projects that use this
gaiaaiagentSkillweekly
Generate a weekly digest rolling up dailies into higher-level pattern analysis
Also in 3 projects that use this
SethGammonSkillexperiment
Automated optimization loop with scalar fitness function. Proposes changes in isolated worktrees, measures with a metric command, keeps improvements, discards failures. Supports convergence detection and diminishing returns.
Also in 3 projects that use this
kv0906Skillinbox
Quick capture mode (with content) or batch processing mode (no content). GTD-style routing of inbox items to proper folders. Use "/inbox thought to capture" or "/inbox" to process.
Also in 3 projects that use this
AnthropicSkillbrief
Generate contextual briefings for legal work — daily summary, topic research, or incident response. Use when starting your day and need a scan of legal-relevant items across email, calendar, and contracts, when researching a specific legal question across internal sources, or when a developing situation (data breach, litigation threat, regulatory inquiry) needs rapid context.
Also in 5 projects that use this
genomewalkerSkillhealth
Soul system health check with remediation
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions51 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 51
- ParadevAI/Paradev★ 16ksame name
- superset-sh/superset★ 16ksame name
- coreyhaines31/makerskills★ 893same name
- me2resh/apexyard★ 542same name
- menkesu/awesome-pm-skills★ 441same name
- BlockRunAI/blockrun-mcp★ 389same name
- kv0906/pm-kit★ 138same name
- Abilityai/cornelius★ 109same name
- me2resh/agent-decision-record★ 48same name
- seandavi/lifeos-template★ 46same name
41 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 50 edited versions we read keep these.
3
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 25
Follow it, log it as settled, and reopen nothing.
- Distinctive: line 45
Before calling a question a matter of preference, ask whether a small throwaway run or measurement would settle it.
- Distinctive: line 59
Never retry anything unchanged.
- Very specific: line 65
Every answer, settled or decided, is one row in repl's decision log: what was decided, why, the evidence as a pointer, and the result.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 50 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
decide
In a repl run, nobody is there to ask. Every question a skill would put to the user comes here instead, and gets one of three answers: follow what is settled, pause for the user, or decide and continue.
This skill applies only inside a repl run. Outside one, the user decides, as every other skill says.
1. Settled
The first of these that answers the question wins:
- The user's explicit instructions in this session.
- The approved spec: goals, non-goals, constraints including run limits, and Approach.
- The plan.
- The rules file and any ADRs.
verify's settled references: the behaviour at BASE, a goal or constraint in the spec, or a crash on input the code plainly accepts.
Follow it, log it as settled, and reopen nothing. A settled answer you dislike is still settled.
2. One-way doors
Pause on any of these. They belong to the user, whatever the run limits say:
- An action visible outside the machine: a push, a pull request, a merge, a deploy, or sending data anywhere.
- Deleting a file that is not on the run's branch, rewriting history, or deleting a branch.
- Auth, secrets, permissions, or a trust boundary.
- Spending beyond the run's budget.
- A new runtime dependency, or a change to a public interface or stored data that the spec does not name.
- Skipping, merging or reordering a pipeline step.
plan,exec,verifyanddebugrun as written in everyreplrun, however small the change looks. - Weakening a check: editing a test's assertions, special-casing an input, disabling or loosening a check, or weakening a spec goal or its criterion. A check that cannot pass honestly is a finding, never a thing to edit.
- Choosing correct behaviour where no settled reference exists and extending the spec would pick a product direction.
- A dead end, where every path forward is a guess.
Pausing is an honest outcome, not a failure to try harder.
3. Experiment
Before calling a question a matter of preference, ask whether a small throwaway run or measurement would settle it. If it would, run it outside the working tree and decide from the result. Log the command and what it returned.
4. Two-way doors
Everything else is in the repo, under version control, and inside the task's scope. Decide it:
- Climb
lazy's ladder. - Pick what serves the spec's goals most directly.
- Between options of the same size, take the one correct on edge cases.
Pick one and continue. Do not stall and do not ask: a wrong two-way call costs less than a blocked run, and the log shows the user every one.
5. Limits
- Never retry anything unchanged. If it failed, something changes first.
- Three failures on the same thing is a dead end, so pause.
- At the round cap, an open warn or nit may be set aside with a ruling. An open blocker never can.
The ruling
Every answer, settled or decided, is one row in repl's decision log: what was decided, why, the evidence as a pointer, and the result. A paused question gets a row too, naming the door.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

