agentleFS
arjunkshaharjunkshah/design-skill/skills/redesign/SKILL.md

redesign

Skill21 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub

Redesign existing interfaces to premium quality while preserving product goals and functional behavior.

  • Installs packages

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

23 rules. 0 are common, 19 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 12 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 19

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 4

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Use this command when a product already exists and needs a stronger layout, visual system, and interaction polish.

    line 10
  2. Distinctive:

    Default to Tailwind CSS for redesign output.

    line 14
  3. Distinctive:

    Use Tailwind utility classes for all visual updates unless the user explicitly requests another styling system.

    line 16
  4. Distinctive:

    use libraries as accelerators, not as full-page templates

    line 27
  5. Distinctive:

    avoid repeated stock patterns from any single library

    line 29
  6. Very specific:

    When redesigning existing UIs with text-overflow risk or unstable wrapping, use @chenglou/pretext to plan text layout before finalizing …

    line 34
  7. Very specific:

    Use prepare() + layout() to validate key text blocks at target widths (hero, cards, CTA rows, nav labels).

    line 37
  8. Distinctive:

    Use the measurements to choose safer width constraints and reduce overflow regressions across breakpoints.

    line 38
  9. Very specific:

    If the redesign depends on precise line rhythm, use prepareWithSegments() + walkLineRanges() to compare alternatives and pick the strongest …

    line 39
  10. Distinctive:

    If the project is static HTML/CDN-only or no JS build step exists, skip pretext integration and handle wrapping with responsive CSS …

    line 40
  11. Distinctive:

    Do this silently; do not include user-facing "Note on Pretext" caveats unless asked.

    line 41
  12. Very specific:

    no single legacy pattern may dominate more than 25% of sections

    line 62
  13. Distinctive:

    If the redesign still resembles the original layout skeleton, escalate structural changes before finalizing.

    line 64
  14. Distinctive:

    When inventing components for redesign:

    line 83
  15. Distinctive:

    ensure implementation remains maintainable in Tailwind class composition

    line 87
  16. Distinctive:

    add motion only where it improves comprehension or feedback speed

    line 88
  17. Distinctive:

    avoid regressions in forms, states, and accessibility

    line 108
  18. Distinctive:

    verify desktop and mobile behavior

    line 112
  19. Distinctive:

    check reduced motion behavior if animations are added

    line 113
  20. Distinctive:

    Do not ship generic “safe SaaS” defaults.

    line 118
  21. Distinctive:

    Do not remove critical information architecture without reason.

    line 119
  22. Distinctive:

    Do not trade usability for visual novelty.

    line 120
  23. Distinctive:

    Keep performance practical for the target context.

    line 121

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 12 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Redesign

Use this command when a product already exists and needs a stronger layout, visual system, and interaction polish.

Implementation Default

Default to Tailwind CSS for redesign output.

  • Use Tailwind utility classes for all visual updates unless the user explicitly requests another styling system.
  • Preserve existing framework/runtime, but move styling decisions toward Tailwind by default when feasible.

UI Library Access

Allowed reference libraries:

  • UIverse
  • FlyonUI (https://flyonui.com/)
  • daisyUI

Rules:

  • use libraries as accelerators, not as full-page templates
  • refactor and mutate library components to fit product semantics and brand direction
  • avoid repeated stock patterns from any single library
  • pair library usage with invented components when repetition risk is high

Pretext Integration

When redesigning existing UIs with text-overflow risk or unstable wrapping, use @chenglou/pretext to plan text layout before finalizing spacing and type scale.

  • Install when needed: npm install @chenglou/pretext
  • Use prepare() + layout() to validate key text blocks at target widths (hero, cards, CTA rows, nav labels).
  • Use the measurements to choose safer width constraints and reduce overflow regressions across breakpoints.
  • If the redesign depends on precise line rhythm, use prepareWithSegments() + walkLineRanges() to compare alternatives and pick the strongest composition.
  • If the project is static HTML/CDN-only or no JS build step exists, skip pretext integration and handle wrapping with responsive CSS constraints instead.
  • Do this silently; do not include user-facing "Note on Pretext" caveats unless asked.

Anti-Repetition Expansion (Required)

Redesign must not look like a cosmetic restyle of standard templates.

Rules:

  1. Build a broad candidate set across component and interaction types before choosing a direction.
  2. Replace repetitive card structures with differentiated component families (data cards, narrative blocks, comparison rows, proof strips, utility panels, etc.).
  3. Invent at least 2 new components for each substantial redesign when current UI blocks are generic.
  4. Invent at least 1 new animation pattern when motion is requested, tied to user feedback or hierarchy.
  5. Reject outputs where variation is only color, border radius, or font changes.

Redesign Diversity Quotas (Required)

For substantial redesigns, enforce:

  1. at least 6 materially different section structures across the page
  2. at least 3 non-card primary content modules
  3. at least 2 newly invented components adapted to this product context
  4. no single legacy pattern may dominate more than 25% of sections

If the redesign still resembles the original layout skeleton, escalate structural changes before finalizing.

Anti-AI-Look Redesign Gate (Required)

Reject the redesign if it reads as "template reskin".

Failure cases:

  1. mostly identical original layout with new colors/fonts only
  2. repeated stock cards replacing repeated stock cards
  3. unchanged section rhythm with minor surface edits
  4. motion limited to basic fade-ins without interaction logic

Minimum redesign bar:

  1. at least 3 clearly new structural modules replacing generic legacy blocks
  2. at least 2 bespoke components unique to the product context
  3. at least 1 unique interaction pattern not present in the source UI

Component Invention Rules

When inventing components for redesign:

  1. derive from product semantics (workflow, trust signal, conversion step), not visual novelty alone
  2. define explicit states and responsive behavior
  3. ensure implementation remains maintainable in Tailwind class composition
  4. add motion only where it improves comprehension or feedback speed

Core Objective

Transform a current interface into a clearer, higher-quality, more intentional design without breaking user flows.

Working Method

  1. Audit the current UI first:
  • identify hierarchy failures, spacing inconsistencies, weak composition, and generic patterns
  • detect interaction pain points and missing feedback states
  • list what must stay stable (flows, core IA, key copy, business constraints)
  1. Define a redesign direction:
  • choose a clear visual thesis and layout archetype
  • strengthen typography, section rhythm, and contrast
  • improve component consistency and responsive behavior
  1. Implement safely:
  • preserve functionality and navigation logic unless explicitly asked to change it
  • avoid regressions in forms, states, and accessibility
  • apply motion where it improves clarity and feedback, not decoration
  1. Validate quality:
  • verify desktop and mobile behavior
  • check reduced motion behavior if animations are added
  • confirm the redesign is materially better, not just stylistically different

Constraints

  • Do not ship generic “safe SaaS” defaults.
  • Do not remove critical information architecture without reason.
  • Do not trade usability for visual novelty.
  • Keep performance practical for the target context.

Download now (ZIP)

  • Other versions12 projects use a version of this.

    Word for word · 0

    None found.

    Edited · 0

    None found.

    Wrote their own version · 12

    1. superset-sh/superset★ 16ksame name
    2. ParadevAI/Paradev★ 16ksame name
    3. plugin87/ux-ui-agent-skills★ 3.1ksame name
    4. educlopez/ui-craft★ 398same name
    5. Integralist/agent-skills★ 20same name
    6. ItamarZand88/design-skills★ 8same name
    7. VoxTechnologies/transmute-framework★ 5same name
    8. vagkaratzas/skills★ 4same name
    9. Darcos-Loft/fluid★ 3same name
    10. F0rger123/CLAUDE-DESIGN-GOD-MODE★ 1same name

    2 more not listed

    How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.

  • Used alongsideProjects with it also use critique, decide and 1 more.

    Other files people use alongside this one.

    Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
    • GoogleSkill

      critique

      Expertise in auditing and fixing repository scripts and GitHub Actions workflows to ensure technical robustness and security.

      Also in 4 projects that use this

    • kv0906Skill

      decide

      Log a decision with context, alternatives considered, and rationale. Use for "/decide project: using websocket over polling" or "/decide project: chose React for frontend".

      Also in 3 projects that use this

    • HK-hubSkill

      polish

      Performs a final quality pass fixing alignment, spacing, consistency, and micro-detail issues before shipping. Use when the user mentions polish, finishing touches, pre-launch review, something looks off, or wants to go from good to great.

      Also in 3 projects that use this

  • In this repository3 other files it gives its agents.

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.