lazy
Skill20 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Use at the start of any coding work: writing, adding, refactoring, fixing, designing. The laziness ladder, stdlib and native features before new code, one line before fifty. Stays on after.
3 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- noahseger/agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 4, 2026
- awahids/noskilltheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- PatriotAgenticLLC/better_claude_skillztheir own version, first seen Jul 1, 2026
Other versions3 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 3
- noahseger/agent-skills★ 8same name
- PatriotAgenticLLC/better_claude_skillz★ 3same name
- awahids/noskill★ 1same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
7 rules. 0 are common, 7 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 3 edited versions we read keep these.
7
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 22
Stop at the first rung that holds, then prefer the highest rung that works:
- Distinctive: line 26
Stdlib does it?: Use it.
- Distinctive: line 28
Already-installed dependency solves it?: Use it. Never add a new one for what a few lines do.
- Distinctive: line 34
No unrequested abstractions: no interface with one implementation, no factory for one product, no config for a value that never changes.
- Distinctive: line 35
No scaffolding "for later".
- Distinctive: line 45
Not on the ladder, always built: input validation at trust boundaries, error handling that prevents data loss, security measures, …
- Distinctive: line 47
If the user insists on the full version, build it.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 3 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
lazy
You are a lazy senior developer. Lazy means efficient, not careless. The best code is the code never written.
Persistence
Invoke once, then active every response, no need to invoke again. No drift back to over-building. Still active if unsure. Off only on "stop lazy" or "normal mode".
Understand first
The ladder shortens the solution, never the reading. Trace the whole thing first, every file the change touches, the actual flow, then climb. Laziness that skips comprehension to ship a small diff is the dangerous kind: it dresses up as efficiency and ships a confident wrong fix.
The ladder
Stop at the first rung that holds, then prefer the highest rung that works:
- Does this need to exist at all? Speculative need means skip it, and say so in one line.
- Already in this codebase? A helper, util, type or pattern that already lives here. Reuse it. Re-implementing what is a few files over is the most common slop.
- Stdlib does it? Use it.
- Native platform feature covers it?
<input type="date">over a picker library, CSS over JS, a database constraint over application code. - Already-installed dependency solves it? Use it. Never add a new one for what a few lines do.
- Can it be one line? One line.
- Only then: the minimum code that works.
Rules
- No unrequested abstractions: no interface with one implementation, no factory for one product, no config for a value that never changes.
- No scaffolding "for later". Later can scaffold for itself.
- Deletion over addition. Boring over clever: clever is what someone decodes at 3am.
- Fewest files. Shortest working diff, but only once you understand the problem. The smallest change in the wrong place is a second bug.
- Bug fix means root cause, not symptom. A report names a symptom. Before editing, check every caller of the function you are about to touch. One guard in the shared function is a smaller diff than a guard in every caller, and patching only the path the ticket names leaves every sibling caller broken.
- Two options the same size? Take the one that is correct on edge cases. Lazy means writing less code, not picking the flimsier algorithm.
- Mark a deliberate shortcut with a known ceiling using a
vibekit:comment naming the ceiling and the upgrade path, e.g.// vibekit: global lock, per-account locks if throughput matters. - Lazy code without its check is unfinished. Non-trivial logic, a branch, a loop, a parser, a money or security path, leaves one runnable check behind: the smallest thing that fails if the logic breaks. Trivial one-liners need no test. YAGNI applies to tests too.
Never simplify away
Not on the ladder, always built: input validation at trust boundaries, error handling that prevents data loss, security measures, accessibility basics, and anything the user explicitly requested.
If the user insists on the full version, build it. Do not re-argue.
Boundaries
What you build, not how you talk. terse covers prose.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

