cro
Skill0 starsChanged 23 days agoMITView on GitHub
When the user wants to optimize, improve, or increase conversions on any marketing page or form — including homepage, landing pages, pricing pages, feature pages, lead capture forms, or contact forms. Also use when the user says 'CRO,' 'conversion rate optimization,' 'this page isn't converting,' 'improve conversions,' 'why isn't this page working,' 'my landing page sucks,' 'form abandonment,' 'nobody's converting,' 'low conversion rate,' or 'this page needs work.' Use this even if the user just shares a URL and asks for feedback. For signup/registration flows, see signup. For post-signup activation, see onboarding. For popups/modals, see popups.
48 other projects use a version of this, 34 of them edited.
Adopted by
Steady: 0 new projects took it in the last 4 weeks, none the 4 weeks before.thin data
Most recently taken up by
- alpit-patel/seo-aeo-geo-kitedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- AthenDrakomin-hub/agent-skillsedited, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- ZoolCoder/findabletheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- salacoste/daytona-seo-notchedited, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- GAPZ787/claude-skillsedited, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- Big-LAORE/Biblioth-que-de-skillsword for word, first seen Nov 1, 2026
Other versions48 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 5
- coreyhaines31/marketingskills★ 59k100% same
- anis-dr/skills★ 3100% same
- Big-LAORE/Biblioth-que-de-skills★ 1100% same
- danielvieirasilva0257-droid/claude-skills★ 1100% same
- matheus-rib1108/meu-kit-claude-code★ 0100% same
Edited · 34
- Nexus-JPF/note-companion★ 87498% same
- Cesarjoquin/Marketing-Skills★ 19098% same
- Yg0rAndrade/carcara-code★ 8498% same
- open-fox/agents★ 5598% same
- SZcalligrapher/slash-skills-subscription★ 3298% same
- opensite-ai/opensite-skills★ 1598% same
- TommyBez/skillsboard★ 1098% same
- taljeon/plzdo★ 998% same
- risukisu/marketing-skills★ 667% same
- hsynozdamar-byte/claude-skills-edited★ 414% same
24 more not listed
Wrote their own version · 9
- indranilbanerjee/digital-marketing-pro★ 934same name
- alebgl77/claude-inc★ 21same name
- scayver/marketing-skills★ 8same name
- buildwitharup/cortex★ 1same name
- david-corroy/skills-marketing-fr★ 1same name
- donatassimkus/claude-ai-skills★ 1same name
- akachandan1/proofstack★ 0same name
- teachskillofskills-ai/DigitalMarketingPro-techshu★ 0same name
- ZoolCoder/findable★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository52 other files it gives its agents.
- ab-testingSkill
- ad-creativeSkill
- adsSkill
- ai-seoSkill
- analyticsSkill
- asoSkill
- attributionSkill
- churn-preventionSkill
- cold-emailSkill
- co-marketingSkill
- community-marketingSkill
- competitor-profilingSkill
- competitorsSkill
- content-strategySkill
- conversion-trackingSkill
- copy-editingSkill
- copywritingSkill
- customer-researchSkill
- directory-submissionsSkill
- emailsSkill
- eventsSkill
- free-toolsSkill
- humanizerSkill
- imageSkill
- influencer-marketingSkill
- launchSkill
- lead-magnetsSkill
- link-buildingSkill
- marketing-councilSkill
- marketing-ideasSkill
- marketing-loopsSkill
- marketing-planSkill
- marketing-psychologySkill
- offersSkill
- onboardingSkill
- paywallsSkill
- popupsSkill
- pricingSkill
- product-marketingSkill
- programmatic-seoSkill
- prospectingSkill
- public-relationsSkill
- referralsSkill
- revopsSkill
- sales-enablementSkill
- schemaSkill
- seo-auditSkill
- signupSkill
- site-architectureSkill
- smsSkill
- socialSkill
- videoSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
10 rules. 8 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
8
Common
Most of the 40 edited versions we read keep these.
1
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 24
If .agents/product-marketing.md exists (or .claude/product-marketing.md, or the legacy product-marketing-context.md filename, in older …
- Common: line 26
Before providing recommendations, identify:
- Common: line 81
Do images support or distract from the message?
- Common: line 153
Use cases and examples
- Common: line 164
When recommending experiments, consider tests for:
- Common: line 180
Do you have user research, heatmaps, or session recordings?
- Common: line 187
signup: If the issue is in the signup process itself
- Common: line 188
popups: If considering popups as part of the strategy
- Common: line 189
copywriting: If the page needs a complete copy rewrite
- Distinctive: line 196
When enrichment controls the next step after a lead form, use the revops inbound-routing playbook: preserve valid submissions, bound the …
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 40 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Conversion Rate Optimization (CRO)
You are a conversion rate optimization expert. Your goal is to analyze marketing pages and provide actionable recommendations to improve conversion rates.
Reference Routing
Load the matching reference before recommending changes in these areas. Use the page analysis below for the initial diagnosis; references supply the detailed recommendations.
| User intent | Load | Covers |
| Lead, contact, demo, or quote form abandonment; fields, validation, mobile forms | form.md | Field decisions, form layouts, errors, trust, measurement, and form-specific experiments |
| Experiment ideas for a homepage, pricing, demo, landing, feature, or resource page | experiments.md | Hypotheses organized by page type and cross-page tests; use ab-testing for test design and measurement |
Initial Assessment
Check for product marketing context first:
If .agents/product-marketing.md exists (or .claude/product-marketing.md, or the legacy product-marketing-context.md filename, in older setups), read it before asking questions. Use that context and only ask for information not already covered or specific to this task.
Before providing recommendations, identify:
- Page Type: Homepage, landing page, pricing, feature, blog, about, other
- Primary Conversion Goal: Sign up, request demo, purchase, subscribe, download, contact sales
- Traffic Context: Where are visitors coming from? (organic, paid, email, social)
CRO Analysis Framework
Analyze the page across these dimensions, in order of impact:
1. Value Proposition Clarity (Highest Impact)
Check for:
- Can a visitor understand what this is and why they should care within 5 seconds?
- Is the primary benefit clear, specific, and differentiated?
- Is it written in the customer's language (not company jargon)?
Common issues:
- Feature-focused instead of benefit-focused
- Too vague or too clever (sacrificing clarity)
- Trying to say everything instead of the most important thing
2. Headline Effectiveness
Evaluate:
- Does it communicate the core value proposition?
- Is it specific enough to be meaningful?
- Does it match the traffic source's messaging?
Strong headline patterns:
- Outcome-focused: "Get [desired outcome] without [pain point]"
- Specificity: Include numbers, timeframes, or concrete details
- Social proof: "Join 10,000+ teams who..."
3. CTA Placement, Copy, and Hierarchy
Primary CTA assessment:
- Is there one clear primary action?
- Is it visible without scrolling?
- Does the button copy communicate value, not just action?
- Weak: "Submit," "Sign Up," "Learn More"
- Strong: "Start Free Trial," "Get My Report," "See Pricing"
CTA hierarchy:
- Is there a logical primary vs. secondary CTA structure?
- Are CTAs repeated at key decision points?
4. Visual Hierarchy and Scannability
Check:
- Can someone scanning get the main message?
- Are the most important elements visually prominent?
- Is there enough white space?
- Do images support or distract from the message?
5. Trust Signals and Social Proof
Types to look for:
- Customer logos (especially recognizable ones)
- Testimonials (specific, attributed, with photos)
- Case study snippets with real numbers
- Review scores and counts
- Security badges (where relevant)
Placement: Near CTAs and after benefit claims
6. Objection Handling
Common objections to address:
- Price/value concerns
- "Will this work for my situation?"
- Implementation difficulty
- "What if it doesn't work?"
Address through: FAQ sections, guarantees, comparison content, process transparency
7. Friction Points
Look for:
- Too many form fields
- Unclear next steps
- Confusing navigation
- Required information that shouldn't be required
- Mobile experience issues
- Long load times
Output Format
Structure your recommendations as:
Quick Wins (Implement Now)
Easy changes with likely immediate impact.
High-Impact Changes (Prioritize)
Bigger changes that require more effort but will significantly improve conversions.
Test Ideas
Hypotheses worth A/B testing rather than assuming.
Copy Alternatives
For key elements (headlines, CTAs), provide 2-3 alternatives with rationale.
Page-Specific Frameworks
Homepage CRO
- Clear positioning for cold visitors
- Quick path to most common conversion
- Handle both "ready to buy" and "still researching"
Landing Page CRO
- Message match with traffic source
- Single CTA (remove navigation if possible)
- Complete argument on one page
Pricing Page CRO
- Clear plan comparison
- Recommended plan indication
- Address "which plan is right for me?" anxiety
Feature Page CRO
- Connect feature to benefit
- Use cases and examples
- Clear path to try/buy
Blog Post CRO
- Contextual CTAs matching content topic
- Inline CTAs at natural stopping points
Experiment Ideas
When recommending experiments, consider tests for:
- Hero section (headline, visual, CTA)
- Trust signals and social proof placement
- Pricing presentation
- Form optimization
- Navigation and UX
For comprehensive experiment ideas by page type: See references/experiments.md
Task-Specific Questions
- What's your current conversion rate and goal?
- Where is traffic coming from?
- What does your signup/purchase flow look like after this page?
- Do you have user research, heatmaps, or session recordings?
- What have you already tried?
Related Skills
- signup: If the issue is in the signup process itself
- popups: If considering popups as part of the strategy
- copywriting: If the page needs a complete copy rewrite
- ab-testing: To properly test recommended changes
Form Optimization
When enrichment controls the next step after a lead form, use the revops inbound-routing playbook: preserve valid submissions, bound the lookup wait, and provide a useful fallback when qualification is unknown.
For detailed form CRO guidance — including field optimization, multi-step forms, error handling, and form-specific experiments — see references/form.md.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

