signup
Skill0 starsChanged 23 days agoMITView on GitHub
When the user wants to optimize signup, registration, account creation, or trial activation flows. Also use when the user mentions "signup conversions," "registration friction," "signup form optimization," "free trial signup," "reduce signup dropoff," "account creation flow," "people aren't signing up," "signup abandonment," "trial conversion rate," "nobody completes registration," "too many steps to sign up," or "simplify our signup." Use this whenever the user has a signup or registration flow that isn't performing. For post-signup onboarding, see onboarding. For lead capture forms (not account creation), see cro.
26 other projects use a version of this, 21 of them edited.
Adopted by
Steady: 0 new projects took it in the last 4 weeks, none the 4 weeks before.thin data
Most recently taken up by
- GAPZ787/claude-skillsedited, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- TommyBez/skillsboardedited, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- AbdelrhmanAlquran/claude-skillsedited, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- hsynozdamar-byte/claude-skills-editedtheir own version, first seen Oct 17, 2026
- masterpeteworld/claude-skillsedited, first seen Oct 15, 2026
- anis-dr/skillsword for word, first seen Oct 15, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use find-animation-opportunities, emil-design-eng and 5 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
wxyhgkSkillfind-animation-opportunities
Search a codebase or UI for places that don't animate but should, and reject everything that shouldn't. Read-only; it proposes motion with exact values, it does not implement it. Use when the user asks "what could be animated here?" or wants to "make this feel more alive". For fixing existing animations, use improve-animations or review-animations instead.
Also in 3 projects that use this
VercelSkillemil-design-eng
This skill encodes Emil Kowalski's philosophy on UI polish, component design, animation decisions, and the invisible details that make software feel great.
Also in 4 projects that use this
arkanSkillreview-animations
Reviews animation and motion code against a high craft bar derived from Emil Kowalski's design engineering philosophy. Default to flagging; approval is earned.
Also in 3 projects that use this
VercelSkillremotion-best-practices
Best practices for Remotion - Video creation in React
Also in 4 projects that use this
StrayDragonSkillui-ux-pro-max
UI/UX design intelligence. 50 styles, 21 palettes, 50 font pairings, 20 charts, 8 stacks (React, Next.js, Vue, Svelte, SwiftUI, React Native, Flutter, Tailwind). Actions: plan, build, create, design, implement, review, fix, improve, optimize, enhance, refactor, check UI/UX code. Projects: website, landing page, dashboard, admin panel, e-commerce, SaaS, portfolio, blog, mobile app, .html, .tsx, .vue, .svelte. Elements: button, modal, navbar, sidebar, card, table, form, chart. Styles: glassmorphism, claymorphism, minimalism, brutalism, neumorphism, bento grid, dark mode, responsive, skeuomorphism, flat design. Topics: color palette, accessibility, animation, layout, typography, font pairing, spacing, hover, shadow, gradient.
Also in 7 projects that use this
ozgureyilmazSkillapple-design
Apple's approach to interface design and fluid, physical motion, translated for the web. Use when building or reviewing gesture-driven UI, spring animations, drag/swipe/sheet interactions, momentum and interruptible transitions, translucent materials and depth, typography (optical sizing, tracking, leading), reduced-motion, or the design foundations (feedback, spatial consistency, restraint) behind Apple-style interfaces.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions26 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 2
- coreyhaines31/marketingskills★ 59k100% same
- anis-dr/skills★ 3100% same
Edited · 21
- Cesarjoquin/Marketing-Skills★ 19099% same
- open-fox/agents★ 5599% same
- SZcalligrapher/slash-skills-subscription★ 3299% same
- opensite-ai/opensite-skills★ 1599% same
- TommyBez/skillsboard★ 1099% same
- agrivisionai/claude-skills★ 199% same
- ngothanhtung/claude-code-skills★ 199% same
- patinaproject/skills★ 199% same
- productionx-in/Core-Skills★ 199% same
- AayanHetam/chess-coach-ai★ 099% same
11 more not listed
Wrote their own version · 3
- scayver/marketing-skills★ 8same name
- hsynozdamar-byte/claude-skills-edited★ 4same name
- david-corroy/skills-marketing-fr★ 1same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository52 other files it gives its agents.
- ab-testingSkill
- ad-creativeSkill
- adsSkill
- ai-seoSkill
- analyticsSkill
- asoSkill
- attributionSkill
- churn-preventionSkill
- cold-emailSkill
- co-marketingSkill
- community-marketingSkill
- competitor-profilingSkill
- competitorsSkill
- content-strategySkill
- conversion-trackingSkill
- copy-editingSkill
- copywritingSkill
- croSkill
- customer-researchSkill
- directory-submissionsSkill
- emailsSkill
- eventsSkill
- free-toolsSkill
- humanizerSkill
- imageSkill
- influencer-marketingSkill
- launchSkill
- lead-magnetsSkill
- link-buildingSkill
- marketing-councilSkill
- marketing-ideasSkill
- marketing-loopsSkill
- marketing-planSkill
- marketing-psychologySkill
- offersSkill
- onboardingSkill
- paywallsSkill
- popupsSkill
- pricingSkill
- product-marketingSkill
- programmatic-seoSkill
- prospectingSkill
- public-relationsSkill
- referralsSkill
- revopsSkill
- sales-enablementSkill
- schemaSkill
- seo-auditSkill
- site-architectureSkill
- smsSkill
- socialSkill
- videoSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
38 rules. 36 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
36
Common
Most of the 22 edited versions we read keep these.
1
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 15
If .agents/product-marketing.md exists (or .claude/product-marketing.md, or the legacy product-marketing-context.md filename, in older …
- Common: line 17
Before providing recommendations, understand:
- Common: line 42
Every field reduces conversion.
- Common: line 43
Do we absolutely need this before they can use the product?
- Common: line 66
No surprises (hidden requirements, unexpected steps)
- Common: line 75
Check for common typos (gmial.com → gmail.com)
- Common: line 81
Consider passphrase hints for strength
- Common: line 82
Update requirement indicators in real-time
- Common: line 91
Only require if immediately used (personalization)
- Common: line 95
Place prominently (often higher conversion than email)
- Common: line 100
Consider "Sign up with Google" as primary
- Common: line 104
If required, explain why
- Common: line 105
Use proper input type with country code handling
- Common: line 115
If needed at signup, keep to one question
- Common: line 116
Use progressive disclosure (don't show all options at once)
- Common: line 135
Put harder questions later (after psychological commitment)
- Common: line 159
Don't clear the form on error
- Common: line 177
Test with actual devices
- Common: line 186
If email verification required:
- Common: line 193
Consider delaying verification until necessary
- Common: line 231
Test hypotheses (things to A/B test)
- Common: line 278
Add or remove phone number field
- Common: line 280
Add or remove company/organization field
- Common: line 281
Test required vs. optional field balance
- Common: line 284
Add SSO options (Google, Microsoft, GitHub, LinkedIn)
- Common: line 286
Test which SSO options resonate (varies by audience)
- Common: line 290
Test button colors and sizes for CTA prominence
- Common: line 292
Test form container styling (card vs.
- Common: line 300
Test headline variations above signup form
- Common: line 302
Add clarity around trial length in CTA
- Common: line 303
Test value proposition emphasis in form header
- Common: line 312
Add social proof next to signup form
- Common: line 313
Test trust badges near form (security, compliance)
- Common: line 314
Add "No credit card required" messaging
- Common: line 323
Test trial length impact (7 vs.
- Common: line 329
Test CAPTCHA impact on completion
- Common: line 347
Do you have field-level analytics on drop-off?
- Distinctive: line 356
If a signup needs enriched company data for a sales-assist handoff, use the revops inbound-routing playbook.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 22 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Signup Flow CRO
You are an expert in optimizing signup and registration flows. Your goal is to reduce friction, increase completion rates, and set users up for successful activation.
Initial Assessment
Check for product marketing context first:
If .agents/product-marketing.md exists (or .claude/product-marketing.md, or the legacy product-marketing-context.md filename, in older setups), read it before asking questions. Use that context and only ask for information not already covered or specific to this task.
Before providing recommendations, understand:
- Flow Type
- Free trial signup
- Freemium account creation
- Paid account creation
- Waitlist/early access signup
- B2B vs B2C
- Current State
- How many steps/screens?
- What fields are required?
- What's the current completion rate?
- Where do users drop off?
- Business Constraints
- What data is genuinely needed at signup?
- Are there compliance requirements?
- What happens immediately after signup?
Core Principles
1. Minimize Required Fields
Every field reduces conversion. For each field, ask:
- Do we absolutely need this before they can use the product?
- Can we collect this later through progressive profiling?
- Can we infer this from other data?
Typical field priority:
- Essential: Email (or phone), Password
- Often needed: Name
- Usually deferrable: Company, Role, Team size, Phone, Address
2. Show Value Before Asking for Commitment
- What can you show/give before requiring signup?
- Can they experience the product before creating an account?
- Reverse the order: value first, signup second
3. Reduce Perceived Effort
- Show progress if multi-step
- Group related fields
- Use smart defaults
- Pre-fill when possible
4. Remove Uncertainty
- Clear expectations ("Takes 30 seconds")
- Show what happens after signup
- No surprises (hidden requirements, unexpected steps)
Field-by-Field Optimization
Email Field
- Single field (no email confirmation field)
- Inline validation for format
- Check for common typos (gmial.com → gmail.com)
- Clear error messages
Password Field
- Show password toggle (eye icon)
- Show requirements upfront, not after failure
- Consider passphrase hints for strength
- Update requirement indicators in real-time
Better password UX:
- Allow paste (don't disable)
- Show strength meter instead of rigid rules
- Consider passwordless options
Name Field
- Single "Full name" field vs. First/Last split (test this)
- Only require if immediately used (personalization)
- Consider making optional
Social Auth Options
- Place prominently (often higher conversion than email)
- Show most relevant options for your audience
- B2C: Google, Apple, Facebook
- B2B: Google, Microsoft, SSO
- Clear visual separation from email signup
- Consider "Sign up with Google" as primary
Phone Number
- Defer unless essential (SMS verification, calling leads)
- If required, explain why
- Use proper input type with country code handling
- Format as they type
Company/Organization
- Defer if possible
- Auto-suggest as they type
- Infer from email domain when possible
Use Case / Role Questions
- Defer to onboarding if possible
- If needed at signup, keep to one question
- Use progressive disclosure (don't show all options at once)
Single-Step vs. Multi-Step
Single-Step Works When:
- 3 or fewer fields
- Simple B2C products
- High-intent visitors (from ads, waitlist)
Multi-Step Works When:
- More than 3-4 fields needed
- Complex B2B products needing segmentation
- You need to collect different types of info
Multi-Step Best Practices
- Show progress indicator
- Lead with easy questions (name, email)
- Put harder questions later (after psychological commitment)
- Each step should feel completable in seconds
- Allow back navigation
- Save progress (don't lose data on refresh)
Progressive commitment pattern:
- Email only (lowest barrier)
- Password + name
- Customization questions (optional)
Trust and Friction Reduction
At the Form Level
- "No credit card required" (if true)
- "Free forever" or "14-day free trial"
- Privacy note: "We'll never share your email"
- Security badges if relevant
- Testimonial near signup form
Error Handling
- Inline validation (not just on submit)
- Specific error messages ("Email already registered" + recovery path)
- Don't clear the form on error
- Focus on the problem field
Microcopy
- Placeholder text: Use for examples, not labels
- Labels: Keep visible (not just placeholders) — placeholders disappear when typing, leaving users unsure what they're filling in
- Help text: Only when needed, placed close to field
Mobile Signup Optimization
- Larger touch targets (44px+ height)
- Appropriate keyboard types (email, tel, etc.)
- Autofill support
- Reduce typing (social auth, pre-fill)
- Single column layout
- Sticky CTA button
- Test with actual devices
Post-Submit Experience
Success State
- Clear confirmation
- Immediate next step
- If email verification required:
- Explain what to do
- Easy resend option
- Check spam reminder
- Option to change email if wrong
Verification Flows
- Consider delaying verification until necessary
- Magic link as alternative to password
- Let users explore while awaiting verification
- Clear re-engagement if verification stalls
Measurement
Key Metrics
- Form start rate (landed → started filling)
- Form completion rate (started → submitted)
- Field-level drop-off (which fields lose people)
- Time to complete
- Error rate by field
- Mobile vs. desktop completion
What to Track
- Each field interaction (focus, blur, error)
- Step progression in multi-step
- Social auth vs. email signup ratio
- Time between steps
Output Format
Audit Findings
For each issue found:
- Issue: What's wrong
- Impact: Why it matters (with estimated impact if possible)
- Fix: Specific recommendation
- Priority: High/Medium/Low
Recommended Changes
Organized by:
- Quick wins (same-day fixes)
- High-impact changes (week-level effort)
- Test hypotheses (things to A/B test)
Form Redesign (if requested)
- Recommended field set with rationale
- Field order
- Copy for labels, placeholders, buttons, errors
- Visual layout suggestions
Common Signup Flow Patterns
B2B SaaS Trial
- Email + Password (or Google auth)
- Name + Company (optional: role)
- → Onboarding flow
B2C App
- Google/Apple auth OR Email
- → Product experience
- Profile completion later
Waitlist/Early Access
- Email only
- Optional: Role/use case question
- → Waitlist confirmation
E-commerce Account
- Guest checkout as default
- Account creation optional post-purchase
- OR Social auth with single click
Experiment Ideas
Form Design Experiments
Layout & Structure
- Single-step vs. multi-step signup flow
- Multi-step with progress bar vs. without
- 1-column vs. 2-column field layout
- Form embedded on page vs. separate signup page
- Horizontal vs. vertical field alignment
Field Optimization
- Reduce to minimum fields (email + password only)
- Add or remove phone number field
- Single "Name" field vs. "First/Last" split
- Add or remove company/organization field
- Test required vs. optional field balance
Authentication Options
- Add SSO options (Google, Microsoft, GitHub, LinkedIn)
- SSO prominent vs. email form prominent
- Test which SSO options resonate (varies by audience)
- SSO-only vs. SSO + email option
Visual Design
- Test button colors and sizes for CTA prominence
- Plain background vs. product-related visuals
- Test form container styling (card vs. minimal)
- Mobile-optimized layout testing
Copy & Messaging Experiments
Headlines & CTAs
- Test headline variations above signup form
- CTA button text: "Create Account" vs. "Start Free Trial" vs. "Get Started"
- Add clarity around trial length in CTA
- Test value proposition emphasis in form header
Microcopy
- Field labels: minimal vs. descriptive
- Placeholder text optimization
- Error message clarity and tone
- Password requirement display (upfront vs. on error)
Trust Elements
- Add social proof next to signup form
- Test trust badges near form (security, compliance)
- Add "No credit card required" messaging
- Include privacy assurance copy
Trial & Commitment Experiments
Free Trial Variations
- Credit card required vs. not required for trial
- Test trial length impact (7 vs. 14 vs. 30 days)
- Freemium vs. free trial model
- Trial with limited features vs. full access
Friction Points
- Email verification required vs. delayed vs. removed
- Test CAPTCHA impact on completion
- Terms acceptance checkbox vs. implicit acceptance
- Phone verification for high-value accounts
Post-Submit Experiments
- Clear next steps messaging after signup
- Instant product access vs. email confirmation first
- Personalized welcome message based on signup data
- Auto-login after signup vs. require login
Task-Specific Questions
- What's your current signup completion rate?
- Do you have field-level analytics on drop-off?
- What data is absolutely required before they can use the product?
- Are there compliance or verification requirements?
- What happens immediately after signup?
Enrichment and Sales-Assisted Routing
If a signup needs enriched company data for a sales-assist handoff, use the revops inbound-routing playbook. Keep account creation separate from enrichment availability; a timeout or ambiguous company match must not become an implicit signup rejection.
Related Skills
- onboarding: For optimizing what happens after signup
- cro: For non-signup forms (lead capture, contact)
- cro: For the landing page leading to signup
- ab-testing: For testing signup flow changes
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

