agentleFS
pixelswithblisspixelswithbliss/claude-skills/skills/signup/SKILL.md

signup

Skill0 starsChanged 23 days agoMITView on GitHub

When the user wants to optimize signup, registration, account creation, or trial activation flows. Also use when the user mentions "signup conversions," "registration friction," "signup form optimization," "free trial signup," "reduce signup dropoff," "account creation flow," "people aren't signing up," "signup abandonment," "trial conversion rate," "nobody completes registration," "too many steps to sign up," or "simplify our signup." Use this whenever the user has a signup or registration flow that isn't performing. For post-signup onboarding, see onboarding. For lead capture forms (not account creation), see cro.

26 other projects use a version of this, 21 of them edited.

Adopted by

Steady: 0 new projects took it in the last 4 weeks, none the 4 weeks before.thin data

Week of Sep 13: 0 new projectsWeek of Sep 20: 0 new projectsWeek of Sep 27: 0 new projectsWeek of Oct 4: 0 new projectsWeek of Oct 11: 0 new projectsWeek of Oct 18: 0 new projectsWeek of Oct 25: 0 new projectsWeek of Nov 1: 0 new projects
Sep 2026Oct 2026Nov 2026
New projects taking a version of this file each week, over the 8 weeks our latest run read: only 0 in all, so this is a hint, not a trend.

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use find-animation-opportunities, emil-design-eng and 5 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • wxyhgkSkill

    find-animation-opportunities

    Search a codebase or UI for places that don't animate but should, and reject everything that shouldn't. Read-only; it proposes motion with exact values, it does not implement it. Use when the user asks "what could be animated here?" or wants to "make this feel more alive". For fixing existing animations, use improve-animations or review-animations instead.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • VercelSkill

    emil-design-eng

    This skill encodes Emil Kowalski's philosophy on UI polish, component design, animation decisions, and the invisible details that make software feel great.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • arkanSkill

    review-animations

    Reviews animation and motion code against a high craft bar derived from Emil Kowalski's design engineering philosophy. Default to flagging; approval is earned.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • VercelSkill

    remotion-best-practices

    Best practices for Remotion - Video creation in React

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • StrayDragonSkill

    ui-ux-pro-max

    UI/UX design intelligence. 50 styles, 21 palettes, 50 font pairings, 20 charts, 8 stacks (React, Next.js, Vue, Svelte, SwiftUI, React Native, Flutter, Tailwind). Actions: plan, build, create, design, implement, review, fix, improve, optimize, enhance, refactor, check UI/UX code. Projects: website, landing page, dashboard, admin panel, e-commerce, SaaS, portfolio, blog, mobile app, .html, .tsx, .vue, .svelte. Elements: button, modal, navbar, sidebar, card, table, form, chart. Styles: glassmorphism, claymorphism, minimalism, brutalism, neumorphism, bento grid, dark mode, responsive, skeuomorphism, flat design. Topics: color palette, accessibility, animation, layout, typography, font pairing, spacing, hover, shadow, gradient.

    Also in 7 projects that use this

  • ozgureyilmazSkill

    apple-design

    Apple's approach to interface design and fluid, physical motion, translated for the web. Use when building or reviewing gesture-driven UI, spring animations, drag/swipe/sheet interactions, momentum and interruptible transitions, translucent materials and depth, typography (optical sizing, tracking, leading), reduced-motion, or the design foundations (feedback, spatial consistency, restraint) behind Apple-style interfaces.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

38 rules. 36 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • 36

    Common

    Most of the 22 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 1

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    If .agents/product-marketing.md exists (or .claude/product-marketing.md, or the legacy product-marketing-context.md filename, in older …

    line 15
  2. Common:

    Before providing recommendations, understand:

    line 17
  3. Common:

    Every field reduces conversion.

    line 42
  4. Common:

    Do we absolutely need this before they can use the product?

    line 43
  5. Common:

    No surprises (hidden requirements, unexpected steps)

    line 66
  6. Common:

    Check for common typos (gmial.com → gmail.com)

    line 75
  7. Common:

    Consider passphrase hints for strength

    line 81
  8. Common:

    Update requirement indicators in real-time

    line 82
  9. Common:

    Only require if immediately used (personalization)

    line 91
  10. Common:

    Place prominently (often higher conversion than email)

    line 95
  11. Common:

    Consider "Sign up with Google" as primary

    line 100
  12. Common:

    If required, explain why

    line 104
  13. Common:

    Use proper input type with country code handling

    line 105
  14. Common:

    If needed at signup, keep to one question

    line 115
  15. Common:

    Use progressive disclosure (don't show all options at once)

    line 116
  16. Common:

    Put harder questions later (after psychological commitment)

    line 135
  17. Common:

    Don't clear the form on error

    line 159
  18. Common:

    Test with actual devices

    line 177
  19. Common:

    If email verification required:

    line 186
  20. Common:

    Consider delaying verification until necessary

    line 193
  21. Common:

    Test hypotheses (things to A/B test)

    line 231
  22. Common:

    Add or remove phone number field

    line 278
  23. Common:

    Add or remove company/organization field

    line 280
  24. Common:

    Test required vs. optional field balance

    line 281
  25. Common:

    Add SSO options (Google, Microsoft, GitHub, LinkedIn)

    line 284
  26. Common:

    Test which SSO options resonate (varies by audience)

    line 286
  27. Common:

    Test button colors and sizes for CTA prominence

    line 290
  28. Common:

    Test form container styling (card vs.

    line 292
  29. Common:

    Test headline variations above signup form

    line 300
  30. Common:

    Add clarity around trial length in CTA

    line 302
  31. Common:

    Test value proposition emphasis in form header

    line 303
  32. Common:

    Add social proof next to signup form

    line 312
  33. Common:

    Test trust badges near form (security, compliance)

    line 313
  34. Common:

    Add "No credit card required" messaging

    line 314
  35. Common:

    Test trial length impact (7 vs.

    line 323
  36. Common:

    Test CAPTCHA impact on completion

    line 329
  37. Common:

    Do you have field-level analytics on drop-off?

    line 347
  38. Distinctive:

    If a signup needs enriched company data for a sales-assist handoff, use the revops inbound-routing playbook.

    line 356

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 22 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Signup Flow CRO

You are an expert in optimizing signup and registration flows. Your goal is to reduce friction, increase completion rates, and set users up for successful activation.

Initial Assessment

Check for product marketing context first: If .agents/product-marketing.md exists (or .claude/product-marketing.md, or the legacy product-marketing-context.md filename, in older setups), read it before asking questions. Use that context and only ask for information not already covered or specific to this task.

Before providing recommendations, understand:

  1. Flow Type
    • Free trial signup
    • Freemium account creation
    • Paid account creation
    • Waitlist/early access signup
    • B2B vs B2C
  2. Current State
    • How many steps/screens?
    • What fields are required?
    • What's the current completion rate?
    • Where do users drop off?
  3. Business Constraints
    • What data is genuinely needed at signup?
    • Are there compliance requirements?
    • What happens immediately after signup?

Core Principles

1. Minimize Required Fields

Every field reduces conversion. For each field, ask:

  • Do we absolutely need this before they can use the product?
  • Can we collect this later through progressive profiling?
  • Can we infer this from other data?

Typical field priority:

  • Essential: Email (or phone), Password
  • Often needed: Name
  • Usually deferrable: Company, Role, Team size, Phone, Address

2. Show Value Before Asking for Commitment

  • What can you show/give before requiring signup?
  • Can they experience the product before creating an account?
  • Reverse the order: value first, signup second

3. Reduce Perceived Effort

  • Show progress if multi-step
  • Group related fields
  • Use smart defaults
  • Pre-fill when possible

4. Remove Uncertainty

  • Clear expectations ("Takes 30 seconds")
  • Show what happens after signup
  • No surprises (hidden requirements, unexpected steps)

Field-by-Field Optimization

Email Field

  • Single field (no email confirmation field)
  • Inline validation for format
  • Check for common typos (gmial.com → gmail.com)
  • Clear error messages

Password Field

  • Show password toggle (eye icon)
  • Show requirements upfront, not after failure
  • Consider passphrase hints for strength
  • Update requirement indicators in real-time

Better password UX:

  • Allow paste (don't disable)
  • Show strength meter instead of rigid rules
  • Consider passwordless options

Name Field

  • Single "Full name" field vs. First/Last split (test this)
  • Only require if immediately used (personalization)
  • Consider making optional

Social Auth Options

  • Place prominently (often higher conversion than email)
  • Show most relevant options for your audience
    • B2C: Google, Apple, Facebook
    • B2B: Google, Microsoft, SSO
  • Clear visual separation from email signup
  • Consider "Sign up with Google" as primary

Phone Number

  • Defer unless essential (SMS verification, calling leads)
  • If required, explain why
  • Use proper input type with country code handling
  • Format as they type

Company/Organization

  • Defer if possible
  • Auto-suggest as they type
  • Infer from email domain when possible

Use Case / Role Questions

  • Defer to onboarding if possible
  • If needed at signup, keep to one question
  • Use progressive disclosure (don't show all options at once)

Single-Step vs. Multi-Step

Single-Step Works When:

  • 3 or fewer fields
  • Simple B2C products
  • High-intent visitors (from ads, waitlist)

Multi-Step Works When:

  • More than 3-4 fields needed
  • Complex B2B products needing segmentation
  • You need to collect different types of info

Multi-Step Best Practices

  • Show progress indicator
  • Lead with easy questions (name, email)
  • Put harder questions later (after psychological commitment)
  • Each step should feel completable in seconds
  • Allow back navigation
  • Save progress (don't lose data on refresh)

Progressive commitment pattern:

  1. Email only (lowest barrier)
  2. Password + name
  3. Customization questions (optional)

Trust and Friction Reduction

At the Form Level

  • "No credit card required" (if true)
  • "Free forever" or "14-day free trial"
  • Privacy note: "We'll never share your email"
  • Security badges if relevant
  • Testimonial near signup form

Error Handling

  • Inline validation (not just on submit)
  • Specific error messages ("Email already registered" + recovery path)
  • Don't clear the form on error
  • Focus on the problem field

Microcopy

  • Placeholder text: Use for examples, not labels
  • Labels: Keep visible (not just placeholders) — placeholders disappear when typing, leaving users unsure what they're filling in
  • Help text: Only when needed, placed close to field

Mobile Signup Optimization

  • Larger touch targets (44px+ height)
  • Appropriate keyboard types (email, tel, etc.)
  • Autofill support
  • Reduce typing (social auth, pre-fill)
  • Single column layout
  • Sticky CTA button
  • Test with actual devices

Post-Submit Experience

Success State

  • Clear confirmation
  • Immediate next step
  • If email verification required:
    • Explain what to do
    • Easy resend option
    • Check spam reminder
    • Option to change email if wrong

Verification Flows

  • Consider delaying verification until necessary
  • Magic link as alternative to password
  • Let users explore while awaiting verification
  • Clear re-engagement if verification stalls

Measurement

Key Metrics

  • Form start rate (landed → started filling)
  • Form completion rate (started → submitted)
  • Field-level drop-off (which fields lose people)
  • Time to complete
  • Error rate by field
  • Mobile vs. desktop completion

What to Track

  • Each field interaction (focus, blur, error)
  • Step progression in multi-step
  • Social auth vs. email signup ratio
  • Time between steps

Output Format

Audit Findings

For each issue found:

  • Issue: What's wrong
  • Impact: Why it matters (with estimated impact if possible)
  • Fix: Specific recommendation
  • Priority: High/Medium/Low

Recommended Changes

Organized by:

  1. Quick wins (same-day fixes)
  2. High-impact changes (week-level effort)
  3. Test hypotheses (things to A/B test)

Form Redesign (if requested)

  • Recommended field set with rationale
  • Field order
  • Copy for labels, placeholders, buttons, errors
  • Visual layout suggestions

Common Signup Flow Patterns

B2B SaaS Trial

  1. Email + Password (or Google auth)
  2. Name + Company (optional: role)
  3. → Onboarding flow

B2C App

  1. Google/Apple auth OR Email
  2. → Product experience
  3. Profile completion later

Waitlist/Early Access

  1. Email only
  2. Optional: Role/use case question
  3. → Waitlist confirmation

E-commerce Account

  1. Guest checkout as default
  2. Account creation optional post-purchase
  3. OR Social auth with single click

Experiment Ideas

Form Design Experiments

Layout & Structure

  • Single-step vs. multi-step signup flow
  • Multi-step with progress bar vs. without
  • 1-column vs. 2-column field layout
  • Form embedded on page vs. separate signup page
  • Horizontal vs. vertical field alignment

Field Optimization

  • Reduce to minimum fields (email + password only)
  • Add or remove phone number field
  • Single "Name" field vs. "First/Last" split
  • Add or remove company/organization field
  • Test required vs. optional field balance

Authentication Options

  • Add SSO options (Google, Microsoft, GitHub, LinkedIn)
  • SSO prominent vs. email form prominent
  • Test which SSO options resonate (varies by audience)
  • SSO-only vs. SSO + email option

Visual Design

  • Test button colors and sizes for CTA prominence
  • Plain background vs. product-related visuals
  • Test form container styling (card vs. minimal)
  • Mobile-optimized layout testing

Copy & Messaging Experiments

Headlines & CTAs

  • Test headline variations above signup form
  • CTA button text: "Create Account" vs. "Start Free Trial" vs. "Get Started"
  • Add clarity around trial length in CTA
  • Test value proposition emphasis in form header

Microcopy

  • Field labels: minimal vs. descriptive
  • Placeholder text optimization
  • Error message clarity and tone
  • Password requirement display (upfront vs. on error)

Trust Elements

  • Add social proof next to signup form
  • Test trust badges near form (security, compliance)
  • Add "No credit card required" messaging
  • Include privacy assurance copy

Trial & Commitment Experiments

Free Trial Variations

  • Credit card required vs. not required for trial
  • Test trial length impact (7 vs. 14 vs. 30 days)
  • Freemium vs. free trial model
  • Trial with limited features vs. full access

Friction Points

  • Email verification required vs. delayed vs. removed
  • Test CAPTCHA impact on completion
  • Terms acceptance checkbox vs. implicit acceptance
  • Phone verification for high-value accounts

Post-Submit Experiments

  • Clear next steps messaging after signup
  • Instant product access vs. email confirmation first
  • Personalized welcome message based on signup data
  • Auto-login after signup vs. require login

Task-Specific Questions

  1. What's your current signup completion rate?
  2. Do you have field-level analytics on drop-off?
  3. What data is absolutely required before they can use the product?
  4. Are there compliance or verification requirements?
  5. What happens immediately after signup?

Enrichment and Sales-Assisted Routing

If a signup needs enriched company data for a sales-assist handoff, use the revops inbound-routing playbook. Keep account creation separate from enrichment availability; a timeout or ambiguous company match must not become an implicit signup rejection.

Related Skills

  • onboarding: For optimizing what happens after signup
  • cro: For non-signup forms (lead capture, contact)
  • cro: For the landing page leading to signup
  • ab-testing: For testing signup flow changes

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.