reliability
Skill2 starsChanged 3 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Use when a service, job, deployment, migration, or integration must remain operable through failures, load, retries, recovery, rollout, or production incidents.
8 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- alo-exp/silver-bullettheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- soreavis/ai-docenttheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- LucSena/how-to-build-softwaretheir own version, first seen Oct 11, 2026
- ai-analyst-lab/ai-analysttheir own version, first seen Sep 10, 2026
- poorvith-mp/skills-developertheir own version, first seen Aug 19, 2026
- aayushostwal/nexustheir own version, first seen Aug 10, 2026
Other versions8 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 8
- ai-analyst-lab/ai-analyst★ 304same name
- aayushostwal/nexus★ 19same name
- alo-exp/silver-bullet★ 7same name
- ffsshhttiikk/opencode-agents-skills★ 2same name
- LucSena/how-to-build-software★ 0same name
- poorvith-mp/skills-developer★ 0same name
- soreavis/ai-docent★ 0same name
- wukai8289/reliability★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository14 other files it gives its agents.
- adversarial-auditSkill
- architectSkill
- cloud-run-basicsSkill
- debuggingSkill
- design-reviewSkill
- executorSkill
- gap-analysisSkill
- github-workflowSkill
- optimizationSkill
- researchSkill
- reuse-firstSkill
- security-reviewSkill
- simplicitySkill
- verificationSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 7 edited versions we read keep these.
3
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 30
Prefer simple bounded behavior over elaborate self-healing that hides faults.
- Distinctive: line 36
When production is impaired:
- Distinctive: line 45
Do not let a postmortem become blame or a list of vague intentions.
- Very specific: line 51
Use adversarial-audit to pressure-test assumptions, verification to design deterministic evidence, and optimization when reliability …
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 7 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Reliability
Design and operate for the failures that matter to users, without buying reliability with unnecessary machinery.
Define the objective
Identify the user-visible service objective, critical dependencies, state that must survive, and tolerated degradation. Use explicit SLO/error-budget concepts when the project needs them; do not invent formal SLOs for a trivial internal script.
Failure and recovery design
Review relevant concerns:
- timeouts and bounded waiting;
- retry policy, backoff, jitter, and retry budgets;
- idempotency and duplicate effects;
- concurrency, backpressure, queue growth, and load shedding;
- dependency failure and degraded modes;
- capacity/resource bounds;
- durable versus rebuildable state;
- health/readiness semantics;
- observability that drives an operator or automation action;
- rollout, feature flags, canary/staged delivery, and fast rollback;
- backup/restore, disaster recovery, and migration recovery where required.
Prefer simple bounded behavior over elaborate self-healing that hides faults. Every retry, queue, cache, replica, and fallback introduces states that must be understood.
Make failure visible at the right boundary. Silent fallback can protect users briefly while hiding a growing data or capacity problem; noisy alerts without an action create toil. Tie important signals to a response, owner, or documented recovery path. For stateful systems, identify the recovery point and recovery time actually required before designing backup/failover machinery.
Incident response
When production is impaired:
- establish impact and current state;
- mitigate safely and restore service;
- preserve evidence;
- communicate material changes/risks;
- identify root cause with
debugging; - record follow-up actions that prevent recurrence or improve detection/recovery.
Do not let a postmortem become blame or a list of vague intentions. Follow-up actions need owners/mechanisms appropriate to the target repository.
Verification
Exercise recovery paths when feasible. A backup never restored, failover never tried, or retry path never tested provides weaker confidence than its existence suggests.
Use adversarial-audit to pressure-test assumptions, verification to design deterministic evidence, and optimization when reliability choices are constrained by measured resource or cost budgets.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

