reliability
Skill304 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub
Run one analytics task through several fresh trials to measure what repeats and what varies. Use for reliability, repeatability, variance, or repeated-run requests. This measures stability, not correctness.
8 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- alo-exp/silver-bullettheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- soreavis/ai-docenttheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- LucSena/how-to-build-softwaretheir own version, first seen Oct 11, 2026
- phatnguyen03022001/agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Aug 24, 2026
- poorvith-mp/skills-developertheir own version, first seen Aug 19, 2026
- aayushostwal/nexustheir own version, first seen Aug 10, 2026
Other versions8 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 8
- aayushostwal/nexus★ 19same name
- alo-exp/silver-bullet★ 7same name
- ffsshhttiikk/opencode-agents-skills★ 2same name
- phatnguyen03022001/agent-skills★ 2same name
- LucSena/how-to-build-software★ 0same name
- poorvith-mp/skills-developer★ 0same name
- soreavis/ai-docent★ 0same name
- wukai8289/reliability★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository65 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- always-compareSkill
- analysis-designSkill
- analyst-coreSkill
- archaeologySkill
- archive-analysisSkill
- auth-preflightSkill
- businessSkill
- causalSkill
- chart-to-driveSkill
- close-the-loopSkill
- codex-reviewSkill
- compare-datasetsSkill
- connect-dataSkill
- connect-snowflakeSkill
- context-compareSkill
- context-traceSkill
- data-inspectSkill
- data-mapSkill
- data-profilingSkill
- data-quality-checkSkill
- datasetsSkill
- distribution-profilerSkill
- evalSkill
- evaluate-graderSkill
- experiment-briefSkill
- experimentSkill
- exploreSkill
- exportSkill
- forecastSkill
- google-doc-exportSkill
- google-slides-exportSkill
- guardrailsSkill
- historySkill
- improve-contextSkill
- knowledge-bootstrapSkill
- log-correctionSkill
- maintain-contextSkill
- metric-specSkill
- metricsSkill
- monitor-evalsSkill
- notion-exportSkill
- paceSkill
- patternsSkill
- question-framingSkill
- question-routerSkill
- resume-pipelineSkill
- run-pipelineSkill
- runsSkill
- score-analysisSkill
- session-handoffSkill
- setup-dev-contextSkill
- setup-notionSkill
- setupSkill
- setup-slackSkill
- setup-snowflakeSkill
- srm-checkSkill
- stakeholder-communicationSkill
- stress-testSkill
- switch-datasetSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 7 edited versions we read keep these.
6
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 17
Use five fresh trials unless the user chooses another count.
- Distinctive: line 20
Use the repository's deterministic reliability runner.
- Distinctive: line 26
Run the reliability command as one foreground task.
- Distinctive: line 30
If the current system already contains a reviewed definition for the question, report that fact.
- Distinctive: line 41
every normalized result beside its raw form.
- Distinctive: line 47
If the trials vary, locate the source before proposing a fix.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 7 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Reliability
What this answers
Does this named system configuration behave consistently on this task?
It does not answer whether the result is correct. A wrong analysis can repeat perfectly.
Run the evaluation
- Record the task, model, active data, available tools, system fingerprint, and the tolerance that matters for the decision.
- Use five fresh trials unless the user chooses another count. The trials must not share answers.
- Preserve completed, failed, blocked, error, and unparseable trials separately.
- Save the raw output from every trial.
- Use the repository's deterministic reliability runner. It creates five independent workspaces, uses the active data source, preserves every result, and calculates the comparison.
- Report exact agreement and agreement within the named tolerance separately.
- State what changed if this is a comparison with an earlier run.
The deterministic CLI is available at python3 -m helpers.evals.cli run-reliability. Use it when the task can be executed noninteractively. For the standard run, explicitly pass --trials 5 --parallelism 5 --model claude-opus-4-6. Add --allow-code when the task requires a query. Do not lower parallelism preemptively or infer an account limit. Lower it only after the five-way run returns an actual concurrency or rate-limit error, and tell the user what failed before retrying.
Run the reliability command as one foreground task. Read its progress messages as trials finish. Do not create separate sleep commands or polling shells merely to wait for it.
The runner automatically gives each trial a clean view of the current analytical system. It excludes old outputs, test fixtures, future course examples, and inactive dataset packages. Connection credentials remain outside the workspace and are passed through the process environment. Do not ask the user to manage excluded paths or trial workspaces.
If the current system already contains a reviewed definition for the question, report that fact. Do not hide current context merely to manufacture variation.
For a separate local context store, pass its path with --context-store. The runner saves a snapshot under the run's context-snapshot/ directory and installs the same contents in each trial. This does not change the project's active context configuration. Without an override, a configured source: path store is used automatically; legacy Git-cache mode must first be connected as a visible local path. Do not silently substitute local definitions if that source cannot be read.
Each trial is instructed to inspect the guide catalog and load relevant reviewed guides. Inspect trials/<number>/trace/context_loads_<analysis_id>.jsonl to see the full guide text loaded, and compare it with the query logs to check application. The snapshot proves which files were available, not that a guide was used. input-inventory.json records trial inputs and response.json preserves the response and captured tool events. Definition labels alone do not establish whether two attempts used the same calculation.
Report
Lead with:
- how many trials succeeded;
- every normalized result beside its raw form;
- exact agreement;
- tolerance-based agreement;
- what definitions or methods changed; and
- what the evidence does not establish.
If the trials vary, locate the source before proposing a fix. If one definition or context change is made, freeze everything else and rerun the same task.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

