agentleFS
phatnguyen03022001phatnguyen03022001/agent-skills/research/SKILL.md

research

Skill2 starsChanged 3 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Use when an engineering decision depends on unknown, current, disputed, externally documented, or version-sensitive technical facts that should not be guessed.

189 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use daily-arxiv, exp-eval and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • LambenthanSkill

    daily-arxiv

    每日从 arXiv 拉取新论文,过滤相关性,auto-ingest 高优先级论文,检测 SOTA 更新

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • LambenthanSkill

    exp-eval

    实验判决门:Review LLM 独立评判实验结果 → 4 种判决路径 → 自动更新 claims confidence、ideas status、graph edges

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • truongtv22Skill

    Problem-Solving Techniques

    Apply systematic problem-solving techniques for complexity spirals (simplification cascades), innovation blocks (collision-zone thinking), recurring patterns (meta-pattern recognition), assumption constraints (inversion exercise), scale uncertainty (scale game), and dispatch when stuck. Techniques derived from Microsoft Amplifier project patterns adapted for immediate application.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • liufeng1976Skill

    setup-ts-deep-modules

    Wire dependency-cruiser into a TypeScript repo so each package is a deep module — implementation hidden in subfolders, reachable only through its entry-point files. User-invoked.

    Also in 43 projects that use this

  • skyllwtSkill

    exp-pilot-eval

    Pilot result evaluation — read pilot results, apply success criteria, update idea page (pilot_result, failure_reason if failed), generate PILOT_VERDICT_REPORT. Called by /ideate Phase 5 after /exp-pilot-run.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • skyllwtSkill

    exp-pilot-run

    Pilot experiment execution — read Pilot Spec YAML, write pilot code, run experiment(Confirm with the user before operation and require the applicant to conduct manual inspection), return results. Called by /ideate Phase 5. Does NOT modify wiki pages or judge pass/fail.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • +5 more from Lambenthan
  • +1 more from skyllwt

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

8 rules. 0 are common, 7 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 169 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 7

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Use external research when facts are current, version-sensitive, unfamiliar, contested, security-sensitive, pricing/billing-related, or …

    line 14
  2. Distinctive:

    Prefer evidence in this order when available:

    line 18
  3. Distinctive:

    Do not promote search ranking, popularity, or repetition into authority.

    line 27
  4. Distinctive:

    Check publication/version dates and distinguish the date a source was published from the date an event or behavior changed.

    line 38
  5. Distinctive:

    Stop researching when the decision is supported well enough to act, remaining uncertainty is explicit, and additional sources are unlikely …

    line 40
  6. Distinctive:

    Treat examples as evidence about behavior only when their version and conditions match the target.

    line 42
  7. Distinctive:

    Do not use research as a substitute for inspecting the actual repository, running available tests, or measuring runtime behavior.

    line 46
  8. Very specific:

    Use reuse-first when the question is whether an existing library, platform feature, protocol, or repository component should be adopted …

    line 48

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 169 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Research

Research exists to resolve a decision, not to accumulate links.

Start with the decision

State the question the evidence must answer and what would change the engineering choice. Separate what is already known from what must be verified. If the target repository already contains authoritative evidence, read that before leaving the repository.

Use external research when facts are current, version-sensitive, unfamiliar, contested, security-sensitive, pricing/billing-related, or materially affect architecture.

Source order

Prefer evidence in this order when available:

  1. target-repository authority and source code;
  2. official specifications and vendor documentation;
  3. upstream source repositories, release notes, and reference implementations;
  4. authoritative engineering or standards bodies;
  5. strong secondary technical sources;
  6. community discussion for experience signals, not unquestioned facts.

Do not promote search ranking, popularity, or repetition into authority.

Evidence discipline

Label material claims as:

  • FACT: directly supported by inspected evidence;
  • INFERENCE: reasoned from facts, with the reasoning stated;
  • ASSUMPTION: temporarily accepted but not verified;
  • UNKNOWN: unresolved and potentially decision-relevant.

Check publication/version dates and distinguish the date a source was published from the date an event or behavior changed. Resolve conflicting sources by authority, freshness, scope, and directness. Quote sparingly; prefer precise paraphrase with citations.

Stop researching when the decision is supported well enough to act, remaining uncertainty is explicit, and additional sources are unlikely to change the choice.

Treat examples as evidence about behavior only when their version and conditions match the target. If documentation and source disagree, surface the disagreement instead of silently choosing the convenient answer.

Boundaries

Do not use research as a substitute for inspecting the actual repository, running available tests, or measuring runtime behavior. Do not generate a decorative bibliography after the decision is already clear.

Use reuse-first when the question is whether an existing library, platform feature, protocol, or repository component should be adopted instead of building. Use design-review when the evidence is already known and the task is to judge architecture trade-offs.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.