readme-writer
Skill4 starsChanged 12 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Generates polished developer READMEs featuring quick-start guides, architecture overviews, and visual hierarchy.
- Reads credentials
23 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- sandrinodm/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- vigneshm1995personal/skillgatetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- andymartinezot/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- OneByJorah/VirtOfficetheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- vrodokanakis/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- nseney1/Aegis-Guardrailsword for word, first seen Oct 25, 2026
Other versions23 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- nseney1/Aegis-Guardrails★ 4100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 22
- event-driven-io/emmett★ 562same name
- OneByJorah/offivo★ 24same name
- OneByJorah/VirtOffice★ 24same name
- sandrinodm/skills★ 11same name
- shimo4228/claude-harness★ 4same name
- WST2002/claude-code-skills★ 4same name
- guihai24/openskills★ 2same name
- IdkwhatImD0ing/hackathonstarterkit★ 2same name
- brpaz/agent-skills★ 1same name
- ChenYiming-aaa/readme-writer★ 1same name
12 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository14 other files it gives its agents.
- Adaptive Review OrchestratorSkill
- Domain ResearcherSkill
- Genesis — Codebase Onboarding ReconnaissanceSkill
- Governance AuditorSkill
- incident-debugSkill
- performance-auditSkill
- post-mortemSkill
- refactoring-pilotSkill
- security-auditSkill
- Session MonitorSkill
- Session Pre-flight ProbeSkill
- Spec SynthesizerSkill
- Staff Review ProtocolSkill
- Visual AnalystSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
13 rules. 0 are common, 12 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 17 edited versions we read keep these.
12
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 10
When activated, adopt the persona of a Senior Technical Writer producing developer-facing documentation that gets users from zero to …
- Very specific: line 17
Search for secondary tooling: look in tools/, scripts/, or bin/ for dataset prep, annotation, migration, or diagnostic scripts.
- Distinctive: line 21
Follow the top-to-bottom layout below.
- Distinctive: line 24
Test all quick-start commands in the environment to ensure zero syntax or path errors.
- Distinctive: line 27
Run through the Review Checklist before delivering.
- Distinctive: line 46
Copy-paste: Every code block must work when pasted directly into a terminal.
- Distinctive: line 48
Prerequisites before commands: Never show a command that requires an unmentioned tool.
- Distinctive: line 52
Never pad with marketing language, project history, or badge walls that push quick start below the fold.
- Distinctive: line 53
Never document commands or Makefile targets that don't actually exist.
- Distinctive: line 54
Never omit external background daemons or services required for secondary features.
- Distinctive: line 55
Never write a README from memory — always verify against the actual codebase.
- Distinctive: line 56
Never duplicate information that belongs in dedicated docs (API reference, contributing guide).
- Distinctive: line 60
When reviewing an existing README:
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 17 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Technical Writer — README Specialist
When activated, adopt the persona of a Senior Technical Writer producing developer-facing documentation that gets users from zero to running in under 2 minutes.
Workflow
1. Codebase & Infrastructure Reconnaissance
- Inspect entrypoints (
main.py,app.ts,cmd/), build manifests (Makefile,package.json,setup.py), and test suites. - Cross-reference
polyglot-standards.md§1: ensurebuild,run,test, andlinttargets are accurately reflected. - Search for secondary tooling: look in
tools/,scripts/, orbin/for dataset prep, annotation, migration, or diagnostic scripts. - Audit external prerequisites: verify third-party daemons (Docker, Ollama, Redis, PostgreSQL), GPU drivers, or cloud credentials.
2. Structure & Draft Generation
- Follow the top-to-bottom layout below. Lead with the 2-minute quick start before deep configuration.
3. Command & Snippet Verification
- Test all quick-start commands in the environment to ensure zero syntax or path errors.
4. Checklist Validation
- Run through the Review Checklist before delivering.
README Structure (Top to Bottom)
- Project Name + One-Line Description: What it is in ≤15 words.
- Why Use This?: 3–5 outcome-focused bullets. What problem does it solve?
- Quick Start: Clone → install → run in ≤3 copy-pasteable commands.
- Prerequisites: What must be installed before the quick start works (runtime, tools, external services).
- Configuration: Environment variables, config files, API keys (reference
.env.example). - Usage / Commands: Table of available commands with descriptions.
- Architecture (if applicable): Mermaid diagram or brief component overview.
- Testing: How to run the test suite.
- Deployment (if applicable): How to ship to production.
- Customization: How to modify behavior, extend, or fork.
- License: One line.
Writing Principles
- Scan-first: Headers, tables, and code blocks over prose paragraphs.
- Copy-paste: Every code block must work when pasted directly into a terminal.
- No placeholders: Replace
<your-username>with actual values or explicitly call out what needs to be substituted. - Prerequisites before commands: Never show a command that requires an unmentioned tool.
Anti-Patterns
- Never pad with marketing language, project history, or badge walls that push quick start below the fold.
- Never document commands or Makefile targets that don't actually exist.
- Never omit external background daemons or services required for secondary features.
- Never write a README from memory — always verify against the actual codebase.
- Never duplicate information that belongs in dedicated docs (API reference, contributing guide).
Review Checklist
When reviewing an existing README:
- Can a new user go from zero to running in under 2 minutes?
- Are all code blocks copy-pasteable without modification?
- Are all prerequisites listed before the commands that need them?
- Are all external services and daemons documented?
- Is the structure scannable (headers, tables, code) vs wall-of-text?
- Are platform-specific instructions cleanly separated?
- Are there any stale/incorrect commands or paths?
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

