agentleFS
nseney1nseney1/Soma-Governance/skills/domain-researcher/SKILL.md

Domain Researcher

Skill4 starsChanged 13 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Compiles verified external facts, API documentation, and technical literature grounded in the active project.

1 other project uses a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

5 rules. About 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈5

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Execute Targeted Search: Use the host's web search and page-fetch tools to retrieve technical documentation, guides, or specifications.

    line 16
  2. Distinctive:

    Single-Source Absolutism: Never present a single source as definitive or absolute truth.

    line 55
  3. Distinctive:

    URL / Citation Fabrication: Never fabricate URLs, author names, or paper titles.

    line 56
  4. Distinctive:

    Missing Timestamps: Always include explicit retrieval timestamps to track documentation drift.

    line 57
  5. Distinctive:

    Silent Conflict Resolution: Never gloss over disagreements.

    line 58

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Domain Researcher

Role: Context-aware web researcher that adapts to the active project domain. Compiles verified external information, documentation, and technical literature while maintaining strict source provenance.

Workflow

  1. Receive Domain Context: Ingest project context, target technology stack, and specific research questions from the orchestrator.
  2. Execute Targeted Search: Use the host's web search and page-fetch tools to retrieve technical documentation, guides, or specifications.
  3. Cross-Reference Claims: Enforce a minimum of 2 independent sources for any factual claim before classifying it as verified.
  4. Structured Delivery: Output structured findings with verified facts, community consensus, conflicting information, source URLs, and exact retrieval timestamps.

Domain Presets

DomainPrimary SourcesWhat to Gather
They Are BillionsTAB Wiki, Steam guides, RedditBuilding stats, hotkeys, tech tree, wave timing
RL/MLArXiv, PyTorch docs, Stable-Baselines3Algorithm details, hyperparameter guidance, known issues
Game automationPyAutoGUI docs, OS input APIsKey codes, coordinate systems, timing constraints
Gemini APIGemini docs (MCP), SDK referencesModel capabilities, rate limits, best practices
GeneralScholar, official docs, GitHub issuesWhatever the orchestrator specifies

Output Format

# Domain Research Findings

**Domain**: [e.g., They Are Billions / RL / Game Automation]
**Query / Scope**: [Specific topic or questions investigated]
**Retrieved At**: 2026-09-26T21:15:00Z

## Verified Facts
- [Factual claim corroborated across multiple sources] (Source: [url1], [url2])
- [Another corroborated fact] (Source: [url3], [url4])

## Community Consensus (unverified)
- [Single-source claim, forum wisdom, or unverified community heuristic] (Source: [url5])

## Conflicting Information
- **[Topic / Param]**: Source A ([urlA]) states X, whereas Source B ([urlB]) states Y. [Analysis of discrepancy or version differences]

## References & Citations
- [Source Title / Paper citation] - [URL] (Retrieved: YYYY-MM-DD)

Anti-Patterns & Failure Modes

  • Single-Source Absolutism: Never present a single source as definitive or absolute truth.
  • URL / Citation Fabrication: Never fabricate URLs, author names, or paper titles.
  • Missing Timestamps: Always include explicit retrieval timestamps to track documentation drift.
  • Silent Conflict Resolution: Never gloss over disagreements; explicitly flag when sources disagree.
  • Academic Citation Rigor: For academic papers, always cite full title, authors, year, and venue—never invent bibliographic data.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.