agentleFS
nicojunknicojunk/claude-ig/skills/ig-strategy/SKILL.md

ig-strategy

Skill17 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub

Content strategy and positioning analysis for Instagram. Pulls live API data, maps audience segments, reviews content pillar distribution, identifies gaps, and delivers a 30/60/90-day growth strategy.

1 other project uses a version of this, 1 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

  • Other versions1 project uses a version of this.

    Word for word · 0

    None found.

    Edited · 1

    1. workflownicojunk/claude-skills★ 099% same

    Wrote their own version · 0

    None found.

    How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.

  • In this repository13 other files it gives its agents.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

1 rule. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈1

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    RULE: All strategic recommendations must be grounded in actual data.

    line 46

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

IG Strategy -- Content strategy and positioning analysis

Key references:

  • references/account-baseline.md -- current metrics, content mix, audience data
  • references/competitor-framework.md -- competitor landscape, positioning map
  • references/content-rules.md -- brand voice, content pillars, banned topics

Phase 1: Account Analysis

Pull live data to establish the current state:

  1. Account info: get_user_info for follower count, bio, media count.
  2. Recent media: get_user_media for last 30-50 posts.
  3. Post insights: get_post_insights for reach, saves, shares per post.
  4. Account insights: get_user_insights for follower demographics, reach trends, activity times.

Calculate from the data:

  • Average engagement rate (overall and by format)
  • Save rate trend (increasing, stable, declining)
  • Reach-to-follower ratio trend
  • Content type distribution (actual vs baseline targets)
  • Posting frequency and consistency score

Load references/account-baseline.md for comparison with historical data.

RULE: All strategic recommendations must be grounded in actual data. Never make recommendations based on assumptions about performance.

Phase 2: Audience Mapping

Build an audience profile from available data and niche knowledge:

Demographics (from API insights if available)

  • Age distribution
  • Gender split
  • Top locations (cities/countries)
  • Active hours and days

Psychographics (from content performance patterns)

  • What topics get the highest save rate? (indicates what the audience values)
  • What topics get the highest share rate? (indicates what they identify with)
  • What gets the most comments? (indicates what they have opinions on)
  • What gets ignored? (indicates misalignment)

Audience Segments

Define 2-4 audience segments based on the data:

SegmentDescriptionContent PreferenceEngagement Style
[Name][who they are][what they want][how they interact]

For each segment, note:

  • Which current content serves them well
  • What content is missing for them
  • Their likely position in the customer journey (awareness, consideration, decision)

Phase 3: Content Pillar Review

Compare current content distribution against ideal targets:

Current Distribution (from Phase 1 data)

Count posts per pillar from the last 30 posts and calculate percentages.

Ideal Distribution

PillarTarget %Current %DeltaAction
Educational40%?%?%Increase/Decrease/Maintain
Personal25%?%?%Increase/Decrease/Maintain
Community20%?%?%Increase/Decrease/Maintain
Promotional15%?%?%Increase/Decrease/Maintain

Pillar Depth Analysis

For each pillar, assess:

  • Topic variety within the pillar (are we repeating the same 3 topics?)
  • Format variety within the pillar (is educational always carousels?)
  • Performance consistency (is one pillar reliably strong or volatile?)

Phase 4: Gap Identification

Identify underrepresented areas across three dimensions:

Topic Gaps

  • Topics relevant to the niche that have never been covered
  • Topics covered once but never revisited despite good performance
  • Trending topics in the fitness/nutrition space not yet addressed

Format Gaps

  • Formats not being used (e.g., no carousels, no collaborative posts)
  • Formats underperforming due to execution, not audience disinterest
  • New Instagram features not yet adopted (e.g., Threads cross-posting, Remix)

Hook Category Gaps

  • Hook patterns from hook-library.md not yet tested
  • Over-reliance on one hook category
  • Emerging hook trends not yet adopted

Positioning Gap

  • What does the account stand for? Is it clear from the last 30 posts?
  • Could a new follower understand the value proposition within 9 grid posts?
  • Is there a unique angle that differentiates from competitors?

Phase 5: Growth Strategy

Build a phased 30/60/90-day growth strategy:

Days 1-30: Foundation

Focus on quick wins and fixing critical gaps.

  • 3-5 specific actions with expected metric impact
  • Each action must address a finding from Phases 2-4
  • Include: content mix adjustments, hook experiments, posting schedule optimization
  • Measurable targets for each action

Days 31-60: Expansion

Build on foundation wins and test new approaches.

  • 3-5 strategic initiatives (e.g., series content, collaborations, new pillar)
  • Each initiative tied to an audience segment from Phase 2
  • Include: format experiments, audience growth tactics, engagement boosters
  • Measurable targets for each initiative

Days 61-90: Optimization

Refine based on 60 days of data and scale what works.

  • 2-3 scaling decisions (double down on winners, cut losers)
  • Long-term positioning adjustments
  • Community building and loyalty strategies
  • Revenue/conversion optimization (if applicable)

Phase 6: Quality Check

Validate the strategy:

  • Every recommendation traces back to a specific data point
  • Audience segments are based on actual engagement patterns
  • Content pillar targets are realistic given current resources
  • Growth targets are ambitious but achievable (not 10x in 30 days)
  • Strategy accounts for the account's niche and audience language
  • No generic advice (every point is specific to this account)
  • Competitor context is included where relevant

Phase 7: Delivery

Output as a structured strategy document:

## Instagram Content Strategy

**Account:** [handle]
**Current Followers:** [count]
**Analysis Period:** [date range]
**Posts Analyzed:** [count]

### Current State Summary
- Engagement Rate: X% (baseline: Y%)
- Best Format: [format] at X% engagement
- Strongest Pillar: [pillar] at X% engagement
- Posting Frequency: X/week

### Audience Profile
[Segment table from Phase 2]

### Content Pillar Rebalancing
[Distribution table from Phase 3]

### Key Gaps Identified
1. [gap with impact assessment]
2. [gap with impact assessment]
3. [gap with impact assessment]

### 30-Day Plan
| Action | Expected Impact | Metric Target | Priority |
|--------|----------------|---------------|----------|

### 60-Day Plan
| Initiative | Expected Impact | Metric Target | Priority |
|------------|----------------|---------------|----------|

### 90-Day Plan
| Strategy | Expected Impact | Metric Target | Priority |
|----------|----------------|---------------|----------|

### Key Metrics to Track
| Metric | Current | 30-Day Target | 90-Day Target |
|--------|---------|---------------|---------------|

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.