agentleFS
nicojunknicojunk/claude-ig/skills/ig-audit/SKILL.md

ig-audit

Skill17 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub

Full Instagram content audit with parallel subagent delegation. Fetches recent posts via API, spawns specialized analysis agents in parallel, aggregates results into a unified report with an IG Health Score (0-100).

9 other projects use a version of this, 1 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use ig-profile, ig-dm and 4 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • JakeschincariolSkill

    ig-profile

    Score an Instagram profile out of 100 against a 12-part rubric and rewrite the parts that lose points - name field, bio, link, highlights, pinned three, grid. Use when the user says "optimize my profile", "fix my bio", "score my Instagram", "why don't people follow me", or pastes their profile and asks how it reads.

    Also in 8 projects that use this

  • JakeschincariolSkill

    ig-dm

    Write Instagram DMs that get replies - the keyword delivery, the first message to someone who engaged, the collab pitch, and the two follow-ups. Use when the user says "DM this person", "what do I send them", "outreach message", "how do I follow up", "pitch this brand", or is reaching out to someone specific.

    Also in 8 projects that use this

  • vava2684Skill

    ig-reply

    Instagram 貼文留言智慧回覆。抓某篇貼文底下的新留言,由 Claude 在對話裡依貼文內容與留言者語言生成友善回覆,再透過 Graph API 自動送出。觸發時機:使用者說「回覆留言」「處理 IG 留言」「回 IG」「IG 自動回覆」「抓留言來回」「回我 IG 那篇」等。

    Also in 7 projects that use this

  • +3 more from Jakeschincariol

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

4 rules. 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 9 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 4

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    CRITICAL: All analysis must be based on actual API data.

    line 39
  2. Distinctive:

    Read all agent output files.

    line 86
  3. Distinctive:

    Create a prioritized list of improvements:

    line 115
  4. Distinctive:

    Before delivering the report, verify:

    line 131

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 9 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

IG Audit -- Full Instagram content audit with parallel agent delegation

Key references:

  • references/scoring-system.md -- metric definitions, scoring thresholds
  • references/account-baseline.md -- current benchmarks, historical averages
  • references/format-specs.md -- format requirements, dimension specs

Phase 1: Data Collection

Fetch live data via Instagram MCP tools:

  1. Account info: get_user_info for follower count, bio, media count.
  2. Recent posts: get_user_media for last 20-50 posts (aim for 30 minimum).
  3. Post insights: get_post_insights for each post (reach, saves, shares, impressions).
  4. Account insights: get_user_insights for follower growth, reach trends.

Bundle API calls in parallel where possible. Store all raw data in a structured format before proceeding.

CRITICAL: All analysis must be based on actual API data. If API calls fail, report the failure and reduce scope accordingly. Never fabricate data.

Phase 2: Agent Delegation

Spawn 6 analysis agents in parallel, each focused on a specific audit dimension. Each agent receives the collected data and its specific analysis brief.

Agent 1: Content Analysis (ig-content)

  • Content pillar distribution (what topics are covered, frequency)
  • Caption quality (length, hook presence, CTA inclusion)
  • Content type mix (educational, entertaining, promotional, personal)
  • Topic gaps and oversaturation

Agent 2: Engagement Analysis (ig-engagement)

  • Engagement rate by format, topic, and posting time
  • Save rate and share rate trends
  • Comment sentiment overview (positive, neutral, negative, questions)
  • DM generation potential (share rate as proxy)

Agent 3: Creative Analysis (ig-creative)

  • Visual consistency (brand colors, fonts, style)
  • Cover/thumbnail quality assessment
  • Video production quality indicators (completion rate as proxy)
  • Hook effectiveness by category

Agent 4: Growth Analysis (ig-growth)

  • Follower growth rate and trajectory
  • Reach-to-follower ratio trend
  • Viral content identification (reach >> follower count)
  • Audience growth sources (if available from insights)

Agent 5: Competitor Benchmark (ig-competitor)

  • Compare key metrics against account-baseline.md benchmarks
  • Identify format or content gaps vs industry standards
  • Note any emerging trends the account is missing

Agent 6: Compliance Check (ig-compliance)

  • Affiliate disclosure compliance (Kennzeichnungspflicht)
  • Content rule violations (check against content-rules.md)
  • Posting frequency consistency
  • Bio optimization status

Each agent writes its findings to a temporary file. Collect all results before proceeding.

Phase 3: Result Aggregation

Collect outputs from all 6 agents and merge into a unified dataset:

  1. Read all agent output files.
  2. Identify conflicting assessments between agents and resolve.
  3. Rank findings by impact (high, medium, low).
  4. Group related findings across agents into themes.

Phase 4: IG Health Score

Calculate the IG Health Score (0-100) using weighted dimensions:

DimensionWeightScore RangeSource Agent
Content Quality20%0-100ig-content
Engagement Performance25%0-100ig-engagement
Creative Quality15%0-100ig-creative
Growth Trajectory20%0-100ig-growth
Competitive Position10%0-100ig-competitor
Compliance10%0-100ig-compliance

Scoring Guide

  • 90-100: Elite. Top 5% of accounts in this niche.
  • 75-89: Strong. Performing above average with clear strengths.
  • 60-74: Average. Solid foundation but significant optimization potential.
  • 40-59: Underperforming. Multiple areas need immediate attention.
  • 0-39: Critical. Fundamental strategy overhaul required.

Calculate each dimension score based on the agent findings, then compute the weighted total.

Phase 5: Prioritized Action Plan

Create a prioritized list of improvements:

Immediate (This Week)

  • Max 3 high-impact, low-effort actions
  • Each must reference a specific finding from the audit

Short-Term (Next 30 Days)

  • 3-5 strategic changes
  • Include expected impact on specific metrics

Long-Term (60-90 Days)

  • 2-3 structural improvements
  • May require new content types, tools, or workflows

Phase 6: Quality Check

Before delivering the report, verify:

  • All 6 agent dimensions are represented in the final report
  • IG Health Score is calculated correctly (weights sum to 100%)
  • Every recommendation is tied to a specific data point
  • No fabricated data (all numbers trace back to API responses)
  • Action plan items are specific and actionable (not vague advice)
  • Report is readable without prior context

Phase 7: Delivery

Output as a comprehensive Markdown report:

## Instagram Audit Report

**Account:** [handle]
**Period:** [date range]
**Posts Analyzed:** [count]
**IG Health Score:** [XX / 100] -- [rating label]

### Score Breakdown
| Dimension | Score | Status |
|-----------|-------|--------|
| Content Quality | XX | [label] |
| Engagement | XX | [label] |
| Creative | XX | [label] |
| Growth | XX | [label] |
| Competitive Position | XX | [label] |
| Compliance | XX | [label] |

### Key Findings
1. [finding with data]
2. [finding with data]
3. [finding with data]

### Strengths
- [strength 1]
- [strength 2]

### Critical Issues
- [issue 1 with impact]
- [issue 2 with impact]

### Action Plan

#### Immediate (This Week)
1. [action] -- Expected impact: [metric improvement]

#### Short-Term (30 Days)
1. [action] -- Expected impact: [metric improvement]

#### Long-Term (60-90 Days)
1. [action] -- Expected impact: [metric improvement]

Save the report to the location specified by the user, or to /tmp/ig-audit-report.md by default.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.