error-recovery
Skill1.5k starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub
Standard recovery patterns for all squad agents. When something fails, adapt — don't just report the failure.
16 other projects use a version of this.
Trending
Less talk lately.about the whole repository
Most recently taken up by
- REPOZY/superpowers-optimizedtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- github/squadword for word, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- NoobyGains/godmodetheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- microsoft/fsi-banking-payments-dispute-resolution-acceleratorword for word, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- microsoft/github-vteam-industry-demosword for word, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- fatih-developer/fth-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
Who's talking about microsoft/waza
- @matsuu.bsky.social“Go実装なんだな。”Bluesky · May 10, 2026 · 4 likes
- postfinance/devcontainer-features“Create a feature that installs waza (https://github.com/microsoft/waza)”GitHub · Aug 14, 2026 · 1 reactions
- @awakecoding.com“The tessl command-line tool uses server-side evals for the agent skills, so you don't have to figure out …”Bluesky · May 15, 2026 · 1 likes
- Azure/azure-sdk-tools“[Discussion][Benchmark] Benchmark framework selection”GitHub · Mar 30, 2026 · 1 reactions
- neilli-sable/dotfiles“Update dependency github:microsoft/waza to v0.40.0”GitHub · Nov 8, 2026
The biggest 5 of 50 mentions linking to the repository that our crawl found. Each line is their own headline.
See all 50
Talked about on GitHub and Bluesky (50 times).
On GitHub · 48
- Aug 14, 2026Create a feature that installs waza (https://github.com/microsoft/waza) — postfinance/devcontainer-features1 reaction
- Mar 30, 2026[Discussion][Benchmark] Benchmark framework selection — Azure/azure-sdk-toolssays it tested it1 reaction · 5 comments
- Nov 8, 2026Update dependency github:microsoft/waza to v0.40.0 — neilli-sable/dotfiles0 reactions
- Nov 6, 2026自作 skill に評価(evals)と静的チェックを用意する — oddgai/dotfiles0 reactions
- Nov 2, 2026build(waza): bump pinned waza to 0.39.1 — akunzai/agent-skills0 reactions
43 more on GitHub
- Oct 13, 2026renovate(mise): Update dependency github:microsoft/waza to v0.38.9 — y-miyazaki/config0 reactions
- Oct 12, 2026build(waza): bump pinned waza to 0.38.10 — akunzai/agent-skills0 reactions
- Oct 9, 2026Update dependency github:microsoft/waza to v0.38.9 — neilli-sable/dotfiles0 reactions
- Oct 8, 2026[Candidate] microsoft/waza/examples/code-explainer - code-explainer — ProSkillsMD/proskills0 reactions · 1 comment
- Oct 8, 2026[Candidate] microsoft/waza/.copilot/skills/error-recovery - error-recovery — ProSkillsMD/proskills0 reactions · 1 comment
- Oct 8, 2026[Candidate] microsoft/waza/.copilot/skills/agent-collaboration - agent-collaboration — ProSkillsMD/proskills0 reactions · 1 comment
- Oct 8, 2026renovate(mise): Update dependency github:microsoft/waza to v0.38.8 — y-miyazaki/config0 reactions
- Oct 5, 2026chore(deps): bump waza to 0.38.9 — akunzai/agent-skills0 reactions · 1 comment
- Oct 4, 2026Clean up the Google Sheet so the graph gets real topics (Category values, duplicates, empty tabs) — Amitro123/knowledgeBase-Agent0 reactions · 3 comments
- Oct 3, 2026Update dependency github:microsoft/waza to v0.38.8 — neilli-sable/dotfiles0 reactions
- Oct 3, 2026chore: update dependency github:microsoft/waza to latest — daaa1k/skills0 reactions · 3 comments
- Sep 3, 2026renovate(mise): Update dependency github:microsoft/waza to v0.38.7 — y-miyazaki/config0 reactions
- Aug 23, 2026Update dependency github:microsoft/waza to v0.38.7 — neilli-sable/dotfiles0 reactions
- Aug 22, 2026renovate(mise): Update dependency github:microsoft/waza to v0.38.6 — y-miyazaki/config0 reactions
- Aug 19, 2026Update dependency github:microsoft/waza to v0.38.6 — neilli-sable/dotfiles0 reactions
- Aug 17, 2026spec: replace API paired evaluation with Waza (Copilot-native) — akunzai/agent-skills0 reactions
- Aug 14, 2026renovate(mise): Update dependency github:microsoft/waza to v0.38.5 — y-miyazaki/config0 reactions
- Aug 12, 2026Update dependency github:microsoft/waza to v0.38.5 — neilli-sable/dotfiles0 reactions
- Aug 3, 2026renovate(mise): Update dependency github:microsoft/waza to v0.38.4 — y-miyazaki/config0 reactions
- Jul 24, 2026renovate(mise): Update dependency github:microsoft/waza to v0.38.3 — y-miyazaki/config0 reactions
- Jul 15, 2026Review and improve Waza User Guide documentation — microsoft/vscode-chat-customizations-evaluation0 reactions · 1 comment
- Jul 15, 2026feat(battle-testing-a-skill): add 7 adversarial dimensions missing vs superpowers/waza/academic threat models — tvna/gitapexsays it tested it0 reactions
- Jul 13, 2026feat(evals): add waza eval suites for all skills lacking coverage — tvna/gitapex0 reactions
- Jul 13, 2026ci: add waza check as a non-blocking skill report — tvna/gitapex0 reactions
- Jul 8, 2026renovate(mise): Update dependency github:microsoft/waza to v0.38.0 — y-miyazaki/config0 reactions
- Jul 4, 2026skill周り整備 umbrella — happy663/dotfiles0 reactions
- Jun 25, 2026renovate(mise): Update dependency github:microsoft/waza to v0.37.0 — y-miyazaki/config0 reactions
- Jun 3, 2026ci(portable-pr-policy): cache prek, waza, and uv artifacts to speed up the all-files run — tvna/claude-md0 reactions · 1 comment
- Jun 3, 2026ci(portable-pr-policy): prek "against all files" step is slow (~110s cold) -- cache hook envs and waza — tvna/claude-md0 reactions
- Jun 1, 2026Waza user guide: Content feedback — microsoft/vscode-chat-customizations-evaluation0 reactions
- May 31, 2026waza example: — KazuCocoa/specialist-role-cards0 reactions
- May 23, 2026[FEATURE]: Improving the skills for kelp migration and development — BenSchr/kelp-core0 reactions
- May 10, 2026feat(evals): introduce microsoft/waza for skill quality evaluation — iwasa-kosui/kamae-ts0 reactions
- Apr 8, 2026feat(ci): waza-based skill quality checks (Phase 1) — PRD #812 — github/squad0 reactions · 6 comments
- Apr 6, 2026PRD: Skill Security Scanning — Markdown-Aware Scanner for Agent-Executable Instructions — github/squad0 reactions · 3 comments
- Apr 6, 2026feat: Adopt waza ComplianceChecker for skill security scanning — github/squad0 reactions · 1 comment
- Apr 4, 2026PRD: Waza-Based PR Quality Checks for Squad Skills — github/squad0 reactions · 3 comments
- Apr 4, 2026PRD: Waza-Based PR Quality Checks for Squad Skills — diberry/squad0 reactions · 1 comment
- Mar 29, 2026Clean up Copilot CLI session-state after eval runs — ronniegeraghty/hyoka0 reactions · 3 comments
- Mar 27, 2026apr may 2026 — kimtth/azure-openai-llm-notes0 reactions
- Mar 25, 2026Bootstrap azure-net-skills-scenarios for .NET SDK skills measurement using waza — JonathanCrd/azure-net-skills-scenarios0 reactions
- Mar 22, 2026feat: add Waza evaluation suite for skill quality validation — ahmadabdalla/azure-cost-calculator0 reactions · 2 comments
- Mar 5, 2026Skill quality validation against sensei/waza best practices — haileyvictory/azure-building-blocks0 reactions
On Bluesky · 2
- May 10, 2026Go実装なんだな。 — @matsuu.bsky.social4 likes and reposts
- May 15, 2026The tessl command-line tool uses server-side evals for the agent skills, so you don't have to figure out how to do it yourself. I didn't… — @awakecoding.com1 likes and repost
Used with
Projects with it also use architectural-proposals, ci-validation-gates and 9 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
Microsoft AzureSkillarchitectural-proposals
How to write comprehensive architectural proposals that drive alignment before code is written
Also in 3 projects that use this
Microsoft AzureSkillci-validation-gates
Defensive CI/CD patterns: semver validation, token checks, retry logic, draft detection — earned from v0.8.22
Also in 3 projects that use this
- +9 more from Azure
Other versions16 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 7
- github/gh-aw★ 5.6k100% same
- github/squad★ 3.4k100% same
- Azure/fleet★ 227100% same
- kubefleet-dev/kubefleet★ 164100% same
- Azure/apiops-cli★ 32100% same
- microsoft/github-vteam-industry-demos★ 2100% same
- microsoft/fsi-banking-payments-dispute-resolution-accelerator★ 0100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 9
- bojieli/ai-agent-book-projects★ 53ksame name
- bojieli/ai-agent-book★ 53ksame name
- REPOZY/superpowers-optimized★ 146same name
- NoobyGains/godmode★ 118same name
- marcusgoll/Spec-Flow★ 94same name
- jnotsknab/mux-swarm★ 9same name
- fatih-developer/fth-skills★ 7same name
- Dragoon0x/product-skills★ 4same name
- RocketDelivery2/github-copilot-jackhammer-service★ 1same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository36 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- .github/copilot-instructions.mdCopilot instructions
- .squad/copilot-instructions.mdCopilot instructions
- .squad-templates/copilot-instructions.mdCopilot instructions
- .squad/templates/copilot-instructions.mdCopilot instructions
- squad-commandsSkill
- code-explainerSkill
- evidence-judgeSkill
- agent-collaborationSkill
- azd-publishSkill
- coordinator-init-modeSkill
- coordinator-response-modeSkill
- coordinator-source-of-truthSkill
- cross-squad-communicationSkill
- cross-squadSkill
- git-workflowSkill
- iterative-retrievalSkill
- reflectSkill
- reviewer-protocolSkill
- secret-handlingSkill
- session-recoverySkill
- squad-conventionsSkill
- squad-helpSkill
- squadSkill
- squad-version-checkSkill
- test-disciplineSkill
- tiered-memorySkill
- code-explainerSkill
- waza-interactiveSkill
- wazaSkill
- {skill-name}Skill
- squad-conventionsSkill
- {skill-name}Skill
- {skill-name}Skill
- squad-conventionsSkill
- waza-runnerSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 7 edited versions we read keep these.
5
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 20
Wait briefly, then retry (start at 2s, double each attempt)
- Distinctive: line 36
Document which alternative was used and why
- Distinctive: line 47
Read the full error output carefully
- Distinctive: line 68
Example: After 3 failed build attempts → "Build fails on line 42 with null reference.
- Distinctive: line 78
If non-critical, log the failure and continue
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 7 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Error Recovery Patterns
Standard recovery patterns for all squad agents. When something fails, adapt — don't just report the failure.
1. Retry with Backoff
When: Transient failures — API timeouts, rate limits, network errors, temporary service unavailability.
Pattern:
- Wait briefly, then retry (start at 2s, double each attempt)
- Maximum 3 retries before escalating
- Log each attempt with the error received
Example: API call returns 429 Too Many Requests → wait 2s → retry → wait 4s → retry → wait 8s → retry → escalate if still failing.
2. Fallback Alternatives
When: Primary tool or approach fails and an alternative exists.
Pattern:
- Attempt primary approach
- On failure, identify alternative tool/method
- Try the alternative with the same intent
- Document which alternative was used and why
Example: Primary CLI tool fails → fall back to direct API call for the same operation.
3. Diagnose-and-Fix
When: Build failures, test failures, linting errors — structured errors with actionable output.
Pattern:
- Read the full error output carefully
- Identify the root cause from error messages
- Attempt a targeted fix
- Re-run to verify the fix
- Maximum 3 fix-retry cycles before escalating
Example: Build fails with a type error → check for missing import → add it → rebuild.
4. Escalate with Context
When: Recovery attempts have been exhausted, or the failure requires human judgment.
Pattern:
- Summarize what was attempted and what failed
- Include the exact error messages
- State what you believe the root cause is
- Suggest next steps or who might be able to help
- Hand off to the coordinator or the appropriate specialist
Example: After 3 failed build attempts → "Build fails on line 42 with null reference. Tried X, Y, Z. Likely a design issue in the Foo module. Recommend the code owner review."
5. Graceful Degradation
When: A non-critical step fails but the overall task can still deliver value.
Pattern:
- Determine if the failed step is critical to the task outcome
- If non-critical, log the failure and continue
- Deliver partial results with a clear note of what was skipped
- Offer to retry the skipped step separately
Example: Generating a report with 5 sections — section 3 data source is unavailable → produce the report with 4 sections, note that section 3 was skipped and why.
Applying These Patterns
Each agent should reference these patterns in their charter's ## Error Recovery section, tailored to their domain. The charter should list the agent's most common failure modes and map each to the appropriate pattern above.
Selection guide:
| Failure Type | Primary Pattern | Fallback Pattern |
| Network/API transient | Retry with Backoff | Escalate with Context |
| Tool/dependency missing | Fallback Alternatives | Escalate with Context |
| Build/test error | Diagnose-and-Fix | Escalate with Context |
| Auth/permissions | Retry with Backoff | Escalate with Context |
| Non-critical data missing | Graceful Degradation | — |
| Unknown/novel error | Escalate with Context | — |
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

