coordinator-response-mode
Skill1.5k starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub
Selecting WHO handles work is the Routing table; selecting HOW they handle it (Direct, Lightweight, Standard, Full) is Response Mode. This skill contains the complete decision table, exemplar prompts for each mode, the Lightweight spawn template, and the upgrade rules. Squad coordinator loads this on demand once routing has identified the agent — to pick the right ceremony level for the task.
6 other projects use a version of this, 6 of them edited.
Adopted by
Steady: 0 new projects took it in the last 4 weeks, none the 4 weeks before.thin data
Most recently taken up by
- github/squadedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- microsoft/github-vteam-industry-demosedited, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- kubefleet-dev/kubefleetedited, first seen Oct 8, 2026
- microsoft/fsi-banking-payments-dispute-resolution-acceleratoredited, first seen Aug 14, 2026
- github/gh-awedited, first seen May 27, 2026
- Azure/fleetedited, first seen Feb 7, 2026
Who's talking about microsoft/waza
- @matsuu.bsky.social“Go実装なんだな。”Bluesky · May 10, 2026 · 4 likes
- postfinance/devcontainer-features“Create a feature that installs waza (https://github.com/microsoft/waza)”GitHub · Aug 14, 2026 · 1 reactions
- @awakecoding.com“The tessl command-line tool uses server-side evals for the agent skills, so you don't have to figure out …”Bluesky · May 15, 2026 · 1 likes
- Azure/azure-sdk-tools“[Discussion][Benchmark] Benchmark framework selection”GitHub · Mar 30, 2026 · 1 reactions
- neilli-sable/dotfiles“Update dependency github:microsoft/waza to v0.40.0”GitHub · Nov 8, 2026
The biggest 5 of 50 mentions linking to the repository that our crawl found. Each line is their own headline.
See all 50
Talked about on GitHub and Bluesky (50 times).
On GitHub · 48
- Aug 14, 2026Create a feature that installs waza (https://github.com/microsoft/waza) — postfinance/devcontainer-features1 reaction
- Mar 30, 2026[Discussion][Benchmark] Benchmark framework selection — Azure/azure-sdk-toolssays it tested it1 reaction · 5 comments
- Nov 8, 2026Update dependency github:microsoft/waza to v0.40.0 — neilli-sable/dotfiles0 reactions
- Nov 6, 2026自作 skill に評価(evals)と静的チェックを用意する — oddgai/dotfiles0 reactions
- Nov 2, 2026build(waza): bump pinned waza to 0.39.1 — akunzai/agent-skills0 reactions
43 more on GitHub
- Oct 13, 2026renovate(mise): Update dependency github:microsoft/waza to v0.38.9 — y-miyazaki/config0 reactions
- Oct 12, 2026build(waza): bump pinned waza to 0.38.10 — akunzai/agent-skills0 reactions
- Oct 9, 2026Update dependency github:microsoft/waza to v0.38.9 — neilli-sable/dotfiles0 reactions
- Oct 8, 2026[Candidate] microsoft/waza/examples/code-explainer - code-explainer — ProSkillsMD/proskills0 reactions · 1 comment
- Oct 8, 2026[Candidate] microsoft/waza/.copilot/skills/error-recovery - error-recovery — ProSkillsMD/proskills0 reactions · 1 comment
- Oct 8, 2026[Candidate] microsoft/waza/.copilot/skills/agent-collaboration - agent-collaboration — ProSkillsMD/proskills0 reactions · 1 comment
- Oct 8, 2026renovate(mise): Update dependency github:microsoft/waza to v0.38.8 — y-miyazaki/config0 reactions
- Oct 5, 2026chore(deps): bump waza to 0.38.9 — akunzai/agent-skills0 reactions · 1 comment
- Oct 4, 2026Clean up the Google Sheet so the graph gets real topics (Category values, duplicates, empty tabs) — Amitro123/knowledgeBase-Agent0 reactions · 3 comments
- Oct 3, 2026Update dependency github:microsoft/waza to v0.38.8 — neilli-sable/dotfiles0 reactions
- Oct 3, 2026chore: update dependency github:microsoft/waza to latest — daaa1k/skills0 reactions · 3 comments
- Sep 3, 2026renovate(mise): Update dependency github:microsoft/waza to v0.38.7 — y-miyazaki/config0 reactions
- Aug 23, 2026Update dependency github:microsoft/waza to v0.38.7 — neilli-sable/dotfiles0 reactions
- Aug 22, 2026renovate(mise): Update dependency github:microsoft/waza to v0.38.6 — y-miyazaki/config0 reactions
- Aug 19, 2026Update dependency github:microsoft/waza to v0.38.6 — neilli-sable/dotfiles0 reactions
- Aug 17, 2026spec: replace API paired evaluation with Waza (Copilot-native) — akunzai/agent-skills0 reactions
- Aug 14, 2026renovate(mise): Update dependency github:microsoft/waza to v0.38.5 — y-miyazaki/config0 reactions
- Aug 12, 2026Update dependency github:microsoft/waza to v0.38.5 — neilli-sable/dotfiles0 reactions
- Aug 3, 2026renovate(mise): Update dependency github:microsoft/waza to v0.38.4 — y-miyazaki/config0 reactions
- Jul 24, 2026renovate(mise): Update dependency github:microsoft/waza to v0.38.3 — y-miyazaki/config0 reactions
- Jul 15, 2026Review and improve Waza User Guide documentation — microsoft/vscode-chat-customizations-evaluation0 reactions · 1 comment
- Jul 15, 2026feat(battle-testing-a-skill): add 7 adversarial dimensions missing vs superpowers/waza/academic threat models — tvna/gitapexsays it tested it0 reactions
- Jul 13, 2026feat(evals): add waza eval suites for all skills lacking coverage — tvna/gitapex0 reactions
- Jul 13, 2026ci: add waza check as a non-blocking skill report — tvna/gitapex0 reactions
- Jul 8, 2026renovate(mise): Update dependency github:microsoft/waza to v0.38.0 — y-miyazaki/config0 reactions
- Jul 4, 2026skill周り整備 umbrella — happy663/dotfiles0 reactions
- Jun 25, 2026renovate(mise): Update dependency github:microsoft/waza to v0.37.0 — y-miyazaki/config0 reactions
- Jun 3, 2026ci(portable-pr-policy): cache prek, waza, and uv artifacts to speed up the all-files run — tvna/claude-md0 reactions · 1 comment
- Jun 3, 2026ci(portable-pr-policy): prek "against all files" step is slow (~110s cold) -- cache hook envs and waza — tvna/claude-md0 reactions
- Jun 1, 2026Waza user guide: Content feedback — microsoft/vscode-chat-customizations-evaluation0 reactions
- May 31, 2026waza example: — KazuCocoa/specialist-role-cards0 reactions
- May 23, 2026[FEATURE]: Improving the skills for kelp migration and development — BenSchr/kelp-core0 reactions
- May 10, 2026feat(evals): introduce microsoft/waza for skill quality evaluation — iwasa-kosui/kamae-ts0 reactions
- Apr 8, 2026feat(ci): waza-based skill quality checks (Phase 1) — PRD #812 — github/squad0 reactions · 6 comments
- Apr 6, 2026PRD: Skill Security Scanning — Markdown-Aware Scanner for Agent-Executable Instructions — github/squad0 reactions · 3 comments
- Apr 6, 2026feat: Adopt waza ComplianceChecker for skill security scanning — github/squad0 reactions · 1 comment
- Apr 4, 2026PRD: Waza-Based PR Quality Checks for Squad Skills — github/squad0 reactions · 3 comments
- Apr 4, 2026PRD: Waza-Based PR Quality Checks for Squad Skills — diberry/squad0 reactions · 1 comment
- Mar 29, 2026Clean up Copilot CLI session-state after eval runs — ronniegeraghty/hyoka0 reactions · 3 comments
- Mar 27, 2026apr may 2026 — kimtth/azure-openai-llm-notes0 reactions
- Mar 25, 2026Bootstrap azure-net-skills-scenarios for .NET SDK skills measurement using waza — JonathanCrd/azure-net-skills-scenarios0 reactions
- Mar 22, 2026feat: add Waza evaluation suite for skill quality validation — ahmadabdalla/azure-cost-calculator0 reactions · 2 comments
- Mar 5, 2026Skill quality validation against sensei/waza best practices — haileyvictory/azure-building-blocks0 reactions
On Bluesky · 2
- May 10, 2026Go実装なんだな。 — @matsuu.bsky.social4 likes and reposts
- May 15, 2026The tessl command-line tool uses server-side evals for the agent skills, so you don't have to figure out how to do it yourself. I didn't… — @awakecoding.com1 likes and repost
Other versions6 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 6
- github/gh-aw★ 5.6k99% same
- github/squad★ 3.4k100% same
- Azure/fleet★ 227100% same
- kubefleet-dev/kubefleet★ 164100% same
- microsoft/github-vteam-industry-demos★ 2100% same
- microsoft/fsi-banking-payments-dispute-resolution-accelerator★ 0100% same
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository36 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- .github/copilot-instructions.mdCopilot instructions
- .squad/copilot-instructions.mdCopilot instructions
- .squad-templates/copilot-instructions.mdCopilot instructions
- .squad/templates/copilot-instructions.mdCopilot instructions
- squad-commandsSkill
- code-explainerSkill
- evidence-judgeSkill
- agent-collaborationSkill
- azd-publishSkill
- coordinator-init-modeSkill
- coordinator-source-of-truthSkill
- cross-squad-communicationSkill
- cross-squadSkill
- error-recoverySkill
- git-workflowSkill
- iterative-retrievalSkill
- reflectSkill
- reviewer-protocolSkill
- secret-handlingSkill
- session-recoverySkill
- squad-conventionsSkill
- squad-helpSkill
- squadSkill
- squad-version-checkSkill
- test-disciplineSkill
- tiered-memorySkill
- code-explainerSkill
- waza-interactiveSkill
- wazaSkill
- {skill-name}Skill
- squad-conventionsSkill
- {skill-name}Skill
- {skill-name}Skill
- squad-conventionsSkill
- waza-runnerSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. 6 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
6
Common
Most of the 6 edited versions we read keep these.
0
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Common: line 14
After routing determines WHO handles work, select the response MODE based on task complexity.
- Common: line 40
Follow-up edits after a Standard/Full response — context is fresh, skip ceremony.
- Common: line 60
If a Lightweight task turns out to need history or decisions context → treat as Standard.
- Common: line 61
If uncertain between Direct and Lightweight → choose Lightweight.
- Common: line 62
If uncertain between Lightweight and Standard → choose Standard.
- Common: line 63
Never downgrade mid-task: If you started Standard, finish Standard.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 6 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Load this skill when: you have routed work to an agent and need to pick the response mode (Direct / Lightweight / Standard / Full). The 1-line stub in
squad.agent.mdis for awareness; this skill is the full decision table + templates.
Response Mode Selection
After routing determines WHO handles work, select the response MODE based on task complexity. Bias toward upgrading — when uncertain, go one tier higher rather than risk under-serving.
| Mode | When | How | Target |
| Direct | Status checks, factual questions the coordinator already knows, simple answers from context | Coordinator answers directly — NO agent spawn | ~2-3s |
| Lightweight | Single-file edits, small fixes, follow-ups, simple scoped read-only queries | Spawn ONE agent with minimal prompt (see Lightweight Spawn Template below). Use agent_type: "explore" for read-only queries | ~8-12s |
| Standard | Normal tasks, single-agent work requiring full context | Spawn one agent with full ceremony — charter inline, history read, decisions read. This is the current default | ~25-35s |
| Full | Multi-agent work, complex tasks touching 3+ concerns, "Team" requests | Parallel fan-out, full ceremony, Scribe included | ~40-60s |
Direct Mode exemplars
Coordinator answers instantly, no spawn:
- "Where are we?" → Summarize current state from context: branch, recent work, what the team's been doing. A user favorite — make it instant.
- "How many tests do we have?" → Run a quick command, answer directly.
- "What branch are we on?" →
git branch --show-current, answer directly. - "Who's on the team?" → Answer from
team.mdalready in context. - "What did we decide about X?" → Answer from
decisions.mdalready in context.
Lightweight Mode exemplars
One agent, minimal prompt:
- "Fix the typo in README" → Spawn one agent, no charter, no history read.
- "Add a comment to line 42" → Small scoped edit, minimal context needed.
- "What does this function do?" →
agent_type: "explore"(Haiku model, fast). - Follow-up edits after a Standard/Full response — context is fresh, skip ceremony.
Standard Mode exemplars
One agent, full ceremony:
- "{AgentName}, add error handling to the export function"
- "{AgentName}, review the prompt structure"
- Any task requiring architectural judgment or multi-file awareness.
Full Mode exemplars
Multi-agent, parallel fan-out:
- "Team, build the login page"
- "Add OAuth support"
- Any request that touches 3+ agent domains.
Mode upgrade rules
- If a Lightweight task turns out to need history or decisions context → treat as Standard.
- If uncertain between Direct and Lightweight → choose Lightweight.
- If uncertain between Lightweight and Standard → choose Standard.
- Never downgrade mid-task. If you started Standard, finish Standard.
Lightweight Spawn Template
Skip charter, history, and decisions reads — just the task:
agent_type: "general-purpose"
model: "{resolved_model}"
mode: "background"
name: "{name}"
description: "{emoji} {Name}: {brief task summary}"
prompt: |
You are {Name}, the {Role} on this project.
TEAM ROOT: {team_root}
CURRENT_DATETIME: <resolved CURRENT_DATETIME literal>
WORKTREE_PATH: {worktree_path}
WORKTREE_MODE: {true|false}
**Requested by:** {current user name}
{% if WORKTREE_MODE %}
**WORKTREE:** Working in `{WORKTREE_PATH}`. All operations relative to this path. Do NOT switch branches.
{% endif %}
TASK: {specific task description}
TARGET FILE(S): {exact file path(s)}
Do the work. Keep it focused.
If you made a meaningful decision, persist it with `memory.write` (class: `decision`) when available, or fall back to `squad_decide` / `squad_state_write` to `decisions/inbox/{name}-{brief-slug}.md`. Do not run git notes, switch branches, or write mutable `.squad/` state by hand.
⚠️ OUTPUT: Report outcomes in human terms. Never expose tool internals or SQL.
⚠️ RESPONSE ORDER: After ALL tool calls, write a plain text summary as FINAL output.For read-only queries, use the explore agent: agent_type: "explore" with "You are {Name}, the {Role}. CURRENT_DATETIME: <resolved CURRENT_DATETIME literal> — {question} TEAM ROOT: {team_root}"
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

