agentleFS
mcabreradevmcabreradev/hermes-sdd-agency/skills/commit-smart/SKILL.md

commit-smart

Skill1 starsChanged 56 days agoMITView on GitHub

Analyze staged/unstaged changes and create semantic...

1 other project uses a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

12 rules. About 0 are common, 11 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈11

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Create meaningful conventional commits by analyzing your actual changes.

    line 10
  2. Distinctive:

    Run these commands to understand the current state:

    line 16
  3. Distinctive:

    If nothing is staged (git diff --cached is empty):

    line 26
  4. Distinctive:

    Ask if they want to stage all, or select specific files

    line 30
  5. Distinctive:

    If changes are already staged, proceed to analysis.

    line 33
  6. Distinctive:

    Read the full staged diff:

    line 37
  7. Very specific:

    If the user provided arguments via $ARGUMENTS:

    line 66
  8. Distinctive:

    Use imperative mood ("add", "fix", "refactor", not "added", "fixes")

    line 77
  9. Distinctive:

    Don't end with a period

    line 78
  10. Distinctive:

    If changes are trivial (typo fix, formatting), skip the body

    line 80
  11. Distinctive:

    Run after completing a logical unit of work, not after every file change

    line 109
  12. Distinctive:

    If the diff is too large for one commit, suggest splitting into multiple commits

    line 110

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md
<!-- hermes-add-skill: description trimmed from 270 chars to fit Hermes' 60-char index --><!-- original description: Analyze staged/unstaged changes and create semantic conventional commits with context about WHY, not just WHAT. Auto-detects commit type and scope from the diff. Supports optional type/scope arguments. Usage - /commit-smart, /commit-smart fix, /commit-smart refactor api -->

Smart Commit

Create meaningful conventional commits by analyzing your actual changes.

Workflow

Step 1: Assess the working tree

Run these commands to understand the current state:

git status
git diff --stat
git diff --cached --stat

Step 2: Handle unstaged changes

If nothing is staged (git diff --cached is empty):

  1. Show the user what files have changed
  2. Suggest what to stage based on logical grouping (e.g., "these 3 files are all related to the auth refactor")
  3. Ask if they want to stage all, or select specific files
  4. Stage the approved files with git add <files>

If changes are already staged, proceed to analysis.

Step 3: Analyze the diff

Read the full staged diff:

git diff --cached

Determine the commit type from the changes:

SignalType
New files with new functionalityfeat
New test files or test additionstest
Changes to existing logic fixing incorrect behaviorfix
Structural changes without behavior changerefactor
package.json, tsconfig, CI config changeschore
Build/bundler config changesbuild
README, docs, comments onlydocs
Formatting, whitespace, semicolons onlystyle
Performance improvementsperf

Determine the scope from the primary directory or module affected:

  • src/api/ -> api
  • src/components/auth/ -> auth
  • tests/ -> tests
  • Root config files -> omit scope
  • Multiple unrelated areas -> omit scope

Step 4: Check for user overrides

If the user provided arguments via $ARGUMENTS:

  • Single word (e.g., fix) -> use as commit type
  • Two words (e.g., refactor api) -> use as type and scope
  • Otherwise -> use auto-detected values

Step 5: Compose the commit message

Format: type(scope): imperative short description

Rules:

  • Subject line max 72 characters
  • Use imperative mood ("add", "fix", "refactor", not "added", "fixes")
  • Don't end with a period
  • Body explains WHY this change was made, not what changed (the diff shows what)
  • If changes are trivial (typo fix, formatting), skip the body

Example:

feat(auth): add JWT refresh token rotation

Tokens were expiring mid-session for users with slow connections.
Rotating refresh tokens extends the session without compromising
security, since each refresh token can only be used once.

Step 6: Confirm and commit

Show the user the proposed commit message and ask for confirmation.

If confirmed, run:

git commit -m "<message>"

Then verify with:

git log --oneline -1

Show the committed hash and message.

Tips

  • Run after completing a logical unit of work, not after every file change
  • If the diff is too large for one commit, suggest splitting into multiple commits
  • For breaking changes, add ! after the scope: feat(api)!: change response format
  • The body should answer "if someone reads this commit in 6 months, will they understand WHY?"

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.