commit-smart
Skill1 starsChanged 56 days agoMITView on GitHub
Analyze staged/unstaged changes and create semantic...
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- JAXTech-Labs/claude-code-templatetheir own version, first seen Apr 7, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- JAXTech-Labs/claude-code-template★ 2same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository67 other files it gives its agents.
- architect-reviewerSkill
- backend-architectSkill
- backend-developerSkill
- code-architectSkill
- codebase-explorerSkill
- code-reviewerSkill
- code-simplifierSkill
- debuggerSkill
- error-detectiveSkill
- fullstack-developerSkill
- git-workflow-managerSkill
- legacy-modernizerSkill
- pragmatic-architectSkill
- prdSkill
- qa-expertSkill
- research-technical-spikeSkill
- sdd-spec-writerSkill
- security-auditorSkill
- supply-chain-securitySkill
- task-decomposition-expertSkill
- technical-debt-managerSkill
- test-engineerSkill
- typescript-proSkill
- architecture-decision-recordsSkill
- hermes-sdd-packagingSkill
- bug-diagnosisSkill
- build-craftSkill
- code-healthSkill
- code-review-checklistSkill
- context-architectureSkill
- design-explorationSkill
- design-to-htmlSkill
- developer-experience-reviewSkill
- diagram-tripletSkill
- dispatching-parallel-agentsSkill
- document-diataxisSkill
- e2e-testing-patternsSkill
- executing-plansSkill
- module-designSkill
- openspec-apply-changeSkill
- openspec-archive-changeSkill
- openspec-bulk-archive-changeSkill
- openspec-continue-changeSkill
- openspec-exploreSkill
- openspec-ff-changeSkill
- openspec-new-changeSkill
- openspec-onboardSkill
- openspec-proposeSkill
- openspec-sync-specsSkill
- openspec-update-changeSkill
- openspec-verify-changeSkill
- plan-scope-reviewSkill
- project-learningsSkill
- qa-test-plannerSkill
- requirements-claritySkill
- review-structuralSkill
- security-evidence-firstSkill
- agency-invocationSkill
- hermes-sdd-orchestrationSkill
- openspec-sddSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
12 rules. About 0 are common, 11 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈11
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 10
Create meaningful conventional commits by analyzing your actual changes.
- Distinctive: line 16
Run these commands to understand the current state:
- Distinctive: line 26
If nothing is staged (git diff --cached is empty):
- Distinctive: line 30
Ask if they want to stage all, or select specific files
- Distinctive: line 33
If changes are already staged, proceed to analysis.
- Distinctive: line 37
Read the full staged diff:
- Very specific: line 66
If the user provided arguments via $ARGUMENTS:
- Distinctive: line 77
Use imperative mood ("add", "fix", "refactor", not "added", "fixes")
- Distinctive: line 78
Don't end with a period
- Distinctive: line 80
If changes are trivial (typo fix, formatting), skip the body
- Distinctive: line 109
Run after completing a logical unit of work, not after every file change
- Distinctive: line 110
If the diff is too large for one commit, suggest splitting into multiple commits
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
<!-- hermes-add-skill: description trimmed from 270 chars to fit Hermes' 60-char index --><!-- original description: Analyze staged/unstaged changes and create semantic conventional commits with context about WHY, not just WHAT. Auto-detects commit type and scope from the diff. Supports optional type/scope arguments. Usage - /commit-smart, /commit-smart fix, /commit-smart refactor api -->Smart Commit
Create meaningful conventional commits by analyzing your actual changes.
Workflow
Step 1: Assess the working tree
Run these commands to understand the current state:
git status
git diff --stat
git diff --cached --statStep 2: Handle unstaged changes
If nothing is staged (git diff --cached is empty):
- Show the user what files have changed
- Suggest what to stage based on logical grouping (e.g., "these 3 files are all related to the auth refactor")
- Ask if they want to stage all, or select specific files
- Stage the approved files with
git add <files>
If changes are already staged, proceed to analysis.
Step 3: Analyze the diff
Read the full staged diff:
git diff --cachedDetermine the commit type from the changes:
| Signal | Type |
| New files with new functionality | feat |
| New test files or test additions | test |
| Changes to existing logic fixing incorrect behavior | fix |
| Structural changes without behavior change | refactor |
| package.json, tsconfig, CI config changes | chore |
| Build/bundler config changes | build |
| README, docs, comments only | docs |
| Formatting, whitespace, semicolons only | style |
| Performance improvements | perf |
Determine the scope from the primary directory or module affected:
src/api/->apisrc/components/auth/->authtests/->tests- Root config files -> omit scope
- Multiple unrelated areas -> omit scope
Step 4: Check for user overrides
If the user provided arguments via $ARGUMENTS:
- Single word (e.g.,
fix) -> use as commit type - Two words (e.g.,
refactor api) -> use as type and scope - Otherwise -> use auto-detected values
Step 5: Compose the commit message
Format: type(scope): imperative short description
Rules:
- Subject line max 72 characters
- Use imperative mood ("add", "fix", "refactor", not "added", "fixes")
- Don't end with a period
- Body explains WHY this change was made, not what changed (the diff shows what)
- If changes are trivial (typo fix, formatting), skip the body
Example:
feat(auth): add JWT refresh token rotation
Tokens were expiring mid-session for users with slow connections.
Rotating refresh tokens extends the session without compromising
security, since each refresh token can only be used once.Step 6: Confirm and commit
Show the user the proposed commit message and ask for confirmation.
If confirmed, run:
git commit -m "<message>"Then verify with:
git log --oneline -1Show the committed hash and message.
Tips
- Run after completing a logical unit of work, not after every file change
- If the diff is too large for one commit, suggest splitting into multiple commits
- For breaking changes, add
!after the scope:feat(api)!: change response format - The body should answer "if someone reads this commit in 6 months, will they understand WHY?"
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

