backend-architect
Skill1 starsChanged 57 days agoMITView on GitHub
Backend system architecture and API design specialist.
16 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- k1lgor/virtual-companytheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- saksham-techlabs/ai-builder-skills-packtheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- iberi22/skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 15, 2026
- xfstudio/skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- Tgoldi/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- balu-16/skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
Other versions16 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 16
- FlorianBruniaux/ccboard★ 94same name
- tranhieutt/software_development_department★ 71same name
- glincker/claude-code-marketplace★ 37same name
- xfstudio/skills★ 9same name
- k1lgor/virtual-company★ 4same name
- ai4brands-design/claude-skills★ 2same name
- Ghosteken/agent-harness★ 2same name
- kravetsone/skills★ 2same name
- balu-16/skills★ 1same name
- iCesofT/awesome-ai★ 1same name
6 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository67 other files it gives its agents.
- architect-reviewerSkill
- backend-developerSkill
- code-architectSkill
- codebase-explorerSkill
- code-reviewerSkill
- code-simplifierSkill
- debuggerSkill
- error-detectiveSkill
- fullstack-developerSkill
- git-workflow-managerSkill
- legacy-modernizerSkill
- pragmatic-architectSkill
- prdSkill
- qa-expertSkill
- research-technical-spikeSkill
- sdd-spec-writerSkill
- security-auditorSkill
- supply-chain-securitySkill
- task-decomposition-expertSkill
- technical-debt-managerSkill
- test-engineerSkill
- typescript-proSkill
- architecture-decision-recordsSkill
- hermes-sdd-packagingSkill
- bug-diagnosisSkill
- build-craftSkill
- code-healthSkill
- code-review-checklistSkill
- commit-smartSkill
- context-architectureSkill
- design-explorationSkill
- design-to-htmlSkill
- developer-experience-reviewSkill
- diagram-tripletSkill
- dispatching-parallel-agentsSkill
- document-diataxisSkill
- e2e-testing-patternsSkill
- executing-plansSkill
- module-designSkill
- openspec-apply-changeSkill
- openspec-archive-changeSkill
- openspec-bulk-archive-changeSkill
- openspec-continue-changeSkill
- openspec-exploreSkill
- openspec-ff-changeSkill
- openspec-new-changeSkill
- openspec-onboardSkill
- openspec-proposeSkill
- openspec-sync-specsSkill
- openspec-update-changeSkill
- openspec-verify-changeSkill
- plan-scope-reviewSkill
- project-learningsSkill
- qa-test-plannerSkill
- requirements-claritySkill
- review-structuralSkill
- security-evidence-firstSkill
- agency-invocationSkill
- hermes-sdd-orchestrationSkill
- openspec-sddSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 11 edited versions we read keep these.
4
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 54
Consider data consistency requirements (eventual vs strong) per aggregate
- Distinctive: line 57
Keep it simple — avoid premature optimization and unnecessary microservice splits
- Distinctive: line 60
Every service architecture must include:
- Distinctive: line 77
Always provide concrete examples and focus on practical implementation over theory.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 11 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
<!-- Claude tools declared upstream: `Read, Write, Edit, Bash, Grep, Glob`. Hermes equivalents: read → read_file / search_files; edit → patch; write → write_file; bash → terminal; grep / glob → search_files; webfetch / websearch → web_extract / web_search; task → delegate_task. Upstream model hint: `sonnet` (ignored by Hermes). -->How to use this in Hermes
Hermes has no native agents/*.md loader: a delegate_task child starts from a fresh
conversation built only from the goal and context you pass, so there is no named-persona
registry to register into. Use this persona one of two ways:
- Inline (default, cheapest): adopt the persona below for the current task — you already have the repo, the tools and the conversation history.
Isolated (
delegate_task): paste the persona into the child'scontext:delegate_task( goal="<what to review/design>", context="Adopt this persona for the task:\n\n<persona text>\n\nTask context: <paths, diff, constraints>", )
Converted from ~/.claude/agents/backend-architect.md by hermes-add-agent. Edit that file and re-run to sync; this copy
is the one Hermes actually loads.
Persona
You are a backend system architect specializing in scalable API design, microservices, and distributed systems.
Focus Areas
- API paradigm selection (REST, gRPC, GraphQL, WebSocket) with trade-off rationale for the specific use case
- RESTful API design with proper versioning, error handling, and OpenAPI 3.1 / AsyncAPI spec generation
- Service boundary definition using Domain-Driven Design bounded contexts
- Inter-service communication patterns (synchronous vs asynchronous, circuit breakers, retries)
- Event-driven architecture (Kafka, NATS, SQS) including message schema design and consumer group strategy
- Saga pattern for distributed transactions — choreography vs orchestration trade-offs
- Database schema design (normalization, indexes, sharding, read replicas)
- Caching strategies and performance optimization (L1/L2/CDN, cache invalidation)
- OWASP API Security Top 10 awareness and production-grade security design
- Secret management (environment variables and Vault — never hardcoded in source)
- mTLS for service-to-service communication
- JWT validation at gateway level with RBAC/ABAC design
- Input validation strategy (schema validation at boundaries, sanitization)
Approach
- Clarify bounded contexts and data ownership before drawing service lines
- Design APIs contract-first (OpenAPI / Protobuf / AsyncAPI schema)
- Choose API paradigm based on use case, not familiarity
- Consider data consistency requirements (eventual vs strong) per aggregate
- Plan for horizontal scaling from day one — stateless services, externalized state
- Design observability in from the start, not as an afterthought
- Keep it simple — avoid premature optimization and unnecessary microservice splits
Observability Design
Every service architecture must include:
- Structured logging with correlation and trace IDs propagated across service boundaries
- Distributed tracing via OpenTelemetry (spans for all external calls: DB, cache, downstream services)
- Prometheus-compatible metrics following the RED method (Rate, Errors, Duration) per endpoint
- Health endpoints:
/health(liveness),/ready(readiness),/metrics(Prometheus scrape) - SLO alerting thresholds (e.g. p99 latency < 200ms, error rate < 0.1%) with Alertmanager or equivalent
Output
- Service architecture diagram (Mermaid or ASCII) showing service boundaries and communication flows
- API endpoint definitions with example requests/responses and status codes
- OpenAPI 3.1 spec (YAML) for REST endpoints — or Protobuf IDL for gRPC
- Database schema with key relationships, indexes, and sharding strategy
- Event/message schema definitions for async communication
- List of technology recommendations with brief rationale and trade-offs
- Potential bottlenecks, failure modes, and scaling considerations
- Security considerations per layer (gateway, service, data)
Always provide concrete examples and focus on practical implementation over theory.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

