agentleFS
lsyamsiarlsyamsiar/claude-skills/skills/sql-pro/SKILL.md

sql-pro

Skill0 starsChanged 11 months agoMITView on GitHub

Optimizes SQL queries, designs database schemas, and troubleshoots performance issues. Use when a user asks why their query is slow, needs help writing complex joins or aggregations, mentions database performance issues, or wants to design or migrate a schema. Invoke for complex queries, window functions, CTEs, indexing strategies, query plan analysis, covering index creation, recursive queries, EXPLAIN/ANALYZE interpretation, before/after query benchmarking, or migrating queries between database dialects (PostgreSQL, MySQL, SQL Server, Oracle).

21 other projects use a version of this, 8 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

9 rules. 0 are common, 8 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 15 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 8

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Design: - Create set-based operations using CTEs, window functions, appropriate joins

    line 22
  2. Very specific:

    Verify: - Run EXPLAIN ANALYZE and confirm no sequential scans on large tables.

    line 24
  3. Distinctive:

    Use set-based operations over row-by-row processing

    line 110
  4. Distinctive:

    Use EXISTS over COUNT for existence checks

    line 112
  5. Distinctive:

    Create covering indexes for frequent queries

    line 114
  6. Distinctive:

    Test with production-scale data volumes

    line 115
  7. Distinctive:

    Use SELECT * in production queries

    line 118
  8. Distinctive:

    Use cursors when set-based operations work

    line 119
  9. Distinctive:

    When implementing SQL solutions, provide:

    line 125

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 15 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

SQL Pro

Core Workflow

  1. Schema Analysis - Review database structure, indexes, query patterns, performance bottlenecks
  2. Design - Create set-based operations using CTEs, window functions, appropriate joins
  3. Optimize - Analyze execution plans, implement covering indexes, eliminate table scans
  4. Verify - Run EXPLAIN ANALYZE and confirm no sequential scans on large tables; if query does not meet sub-100ms target, iterate on index selection or query rewrite before proceeding
  5. Document - Provide query explanations, index rationale, performance metrics

Reference Guide

Load detailed guidance based on context:

TopicReferenceLoad When
Query Patternsreferences/query-patterns.mdJOINs, CTEs, subqueries, recursive queries
Window Functionsreferences/window-functions.mdROW_NUMBER, RANK, LAG/LEAD, analytics
Optimizationreferences/optimization.mdEXPLAIN plans, indexes, statistics, tuning
Database Designreferences/database-design.mdNormalization, keys, constraints, schemas
Dialect Differencesreferences/dialect-differences.mdPostgreSQL vs MySQL vs SQL Server specifics

Quick-Reference Examples

CTE Pattern

-- Isolate expensive subquery logic for reuse and readability
WITH ranked_orders AS (
    SELECT
        customer_id,
        order_id,
        total_amount,
        ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY customer_id ORDER BY order_date DESC) AS rn
    FROM orders
    WHERE status = 'completed'          -- filter early, before the join
)
SELECT customer_id, order_id, total_amount
FROM ranked_orders
WHERE rn = 1;                           -- latest completed order per customer

Window Function Pattern

-- Running total and rank within partition — no self-join required
SELECT
    department_id,
    employee_id,
    salary,
    SUM(salary)  OVER (PARTITION BY department_id ORDER BY hire_date) AS running_payroll,
    RANK()       OVER (PARTITION BY department_id ORDER BY salary DESC) AS salary_rank
FROM employees;

EXPLAIN ANALYZE Interpretation

-- PostgreSQL: always use ANALYZE to see actual row counts vs. estimates
EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, BUFFERS, FORMAT TEXT)
SELECT *
FROM orders o
JOIN customers c ON c.id = o.customer_id
WHERE o.created_at > NOW() - INTERVAL '30 days';

Key things to check in the output:

  • Seq Scan on large table → add or fix an index
  • actual rows ≫ estimated rows → run ANALYZE <table> to refresh statistics
  • Buffers: shared hit vs read → high read count signals missing cache / index

Before / After Optimization Example

-- BEFORE: correlated subquery, one execution per row (slow)
SELECT order_id,
       (SELECT SUM(quantity) FROM order_items oi WHERE oi.order_id = o.id) AS item_count
FROM orders o;

-- AFTER: single aggregation join (fast)
SELECT o.order_id, COALESCE(agg.item_count, 0) AS item_count
FROM orders o
LEFT JOIN (
    SELECT order_id, SUM(quantity) AS item_count
    FROM order_items
    GROUP BY order_id
) agg ON agg.order_id = o.id;

-- Supporting covering index (includes all columns touched by the query)
CREATE INDEX idx_order_items_order_qty
    ON order_items (order_id)
    INCLUDE (quantity);

Constraints

MUST DO

  • Analyze execution plans before recommending optimizations
  • Use set-based operations over row-by-row processing
  • Apply filtering early in query execution (before joins where possible)
  • Use EXISTS over COUNT for existence checks
  • Handle NULLs explicitly in comparisons and aggregations
  • Create covering indexes for frequent queries
  • Test with production-scale data volumes

MUST NOT DO

  • Use SELECT * in production queries
  • Use cursors when set-based operations work
  • Ignore platform-specific optimizations when targeting a specific dialect
  • Implement solutions without considering data volume and cardinality

Output Templates

When implementing SQL solutions, provide:

  1. Optimized query with inline comments
  2. Required indexes with rationale
  3. Execution plan analysis
  4. Performance metrics (before/after)
  5. Platform-specific notes if applicable

Maintained by @jeffallan, Principal Consultant at Synergetic Solutions

Documentation

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.