agentleFS
lsyamsiarlsyamsiar/claude-skills/skills/fullstack-guardian/SKILL.md

fullstack-guardian

Skill0 starsChanged 11 months agoMITView on GitHub

Builds security-focused full-stack web applications by implementing integrated frontend and backend components with layered security at every level. Covers the complete stack from database to UI, enforcing auth, input validation, output encoding, and parameterized queries across all layers. Use when implementing features across frontend and backend, building REST APIs with corresponding UI, connecting frontend components to backend endpoints, creating end-to-end data flows from database to UI, or implementing CRUD operations with UI forms. Distinct from frontend-only, backend-only, or API-only skills in that it simultaneously addresses all three perspectives—Frontend, Backend, and Security—within a single implementation workflow. Invoke for full-stack feature work, web app development, authenticated API routes with views, microservices, real-time features, monorepo architecture, or technology selection decisions.

11 other projects use a version of this, 7 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use receiving-code-review, ui-ux-pro-max and 1 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • CloudflareSkill

    receiving-code-review

    Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • StrayDragonSkill

    ui-ux-pro-max

    UI/UX design intelligence. 50 styles, 21 palettes, 50 font pairings, 20 charts, 8 stacks (React, Next.js, Vue, Svelte, SwiftUI, React Native, Flutter, Tailwind). Actions: plan, build, create, design, implement, review, fix, improve, optimize, enhance, refactor, check UI/UX code. Projects: website, landing page, dashboard, admin panel, e-commerce, SaaS, portfolio, blog, mobile app, .html, .tsx, .vue, .svelte. Elements: button, modal, navbar, sidebar, card, table, form, chart. Styles: glassmorphism, claymorphism, minimalism, brutalism, neumorphism, bento grid, dark mode, responsive, skeuomorphism, flat design. Topics: color palette, accessibility, animation, layout, typography, font pairing, spacing, hover, shadow, gradient.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • OpenAISkill

    requesting-code-review

    Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements

    Also in 3 projects that use this

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

7 rules. 4 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.

  • 4

    Common

    Most of the 7 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 0

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 3

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Design solution: - Consider all three perspectives (Frontend/Backend/Security)

    line 24
  2. Very specific:

    Write technical design: - Document approach in specs/{feature}_design.md

    line 25
  3. Very specific:

    Security checkpoint: - Run through references/security-checklist.md before writing any code.

    line 26
  4. Common:

    Use parameterized queries (prevent SQL injection)

    line 52
  5. Common:

    Write the implementation plan before coding

    line 56
  6. Common:

    Test each component as you build

    line 57
  7. Common:

    When implementing features, provide:

    line 102

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 7 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Fullstack Guardian

Security-focused full-stack developer implementing features across the entire application stack.

Core Workflow

  1. Gather requirements - Understand feature scope and acceptance criteria
  2. Design solution - Consider all three perspectives (Frontend/Backend/Security)
  3. Write technical design - Document approach in specs/{feature}_design.md
  4. Security checkpoint - Run through references/security-checklist.md before writing any code; confirm auth, authz, validation, and output encoding are addressed
  5. Implement - Build incrementally, testing each component as you go
  6. Hand off - Pass to Test Master for QA, DevOps for deployment

Reference Guide

Load detailed guidance based on context:

TopicReferenceLoad When
Design Templatereferences/design-template.mdStarting feature, three-perspective design
Security Checklistreferences/security-checklist.mdEvery feature - auth, authz, validation
Error Handlingreferences/error-handling.mdImplementing error flows
Common Patternsreferences/common-patterns.mdCRUD, forms, API flows
Backend Patternsreferences/backend-patterns.mdMicroservices, queues, observability, Docker
Frontend Patternsreferences/frontend-patterns.mdReal-time, optimization, accessibility, testing
Integration Patternsreferences/integration-patterns.mdType sharing, deployment, architecture decisions
API Designreferences/api-design-standards.mdREST/GraphQL APIs, versioning, CORS, validation
Architecture Decisionsreferences/architecture-decisions.mdTech selection, monolith vs microservices
Deliverables Checklistreferences/deliverables-checklist.mdCompleting features, preparing handoff

Constraints

MUST DO

  • Address all three perspectives (Frontend, Backend, Security)
  • Validate input on both client and server
  • Use parameterized queries (prevent SQL injection)
  • Sanitize output (prevent XSS)
  • Implement proper error handling at every layer
  • Log security-relevant events
  • Write the implementation plan before coding
  • Test each component as you build

MUST NOT DO

  • Skip security considerations
  • Trust client-side validation alone
  • Expose sensitive data in API responses
  • Hardcode credentials or secrets
  • Implement features without acceptance criteria
  • Skip error handling for "happy path only"

Three-Perspective Example

A minimal authenticated endpoint illustrating all three layers:

[Backend] — Authenticated route with parameterized query and scoped response:

@router.get("/users/{user_id}/profile", dependencies=[Depends(require_auth)])
async def get_profile(user_id: int, current_user: User = Depends(get_current_user)):
    if current_user.id != user_id:
        raise HTTPException(status_code=403, detail="Forbidden")
    # Parameterized query — no raw string interpolation
    row = await db.fetchone("SELECT id, name, email FROM users WHERE id = ?", (user_id,))
    if not row:
        raise HTTPException(status_code=404, detail="Not found")
    return ProfileResponse(**row)   # explicit schema — no password/token leakage

[Frontend] — Component calls the endpoint and handles errors gracefully:

async function fetchProfile(userId: number): Promise<Profile> {
  const res = await apiFetch(`/users/${userId}/profile`);   // apiFetch attaches auth header
  if (!res.ok) throw new Error(await res.text());
  return res.json();
}
// Client-side input guard (never the only guard)
if (!Number.isInteger(userId) || userId <= 0) throw new Error("Invalid user ID");

[Security]

  • Auth enforced server-side via require_auth dependency; client header is a convenience, not the gate.
  • Response schema (ProfileResponse) explicitly excludes sensitive fields.
  • 403 returned before any DB access when IDs don't match — no timing leak via 404.

Output Templates

When implementing features, provide:

  1. Technical design document (if non-trivial)
  2. Backend code (models, schemas, endpoints)
  3. Frontend code (components, hooks, API calls)
  4. Brief security notes

Maintained by @jeffallan, Principal Consultant at Synergetic Solutions

Documentation

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.