fullstack-guardian
Skill0 starsChanged 11 months agoMITView on GitHub
Builds security-focused full-stack web applications by implementing integrated frontend and backend components with layered security at every level. Covers the complete stack from database to UI, enforcing auth, input validation, output encoding, and parameterized queries across all layers. Use when implementing features across frontend and backend, building REST APIs with corresponding UI, connecting frontend components to backend endpoints, creating end-to-end data flows from database to UI, or implementing CRUD operations with UI forms. Distinct from frontend-only, backend-only, or API-only skills in that it simultaneously addresses all three perspectives—Frontend, Backend, and Security—within a single implementation workflow. Invoke for full-stack feature work, web app development, authenticated API routes with views, microservices, real-time features, monorepo architecture, or technology selection decisions.
11 other projects use a version of this, 7 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- santiago-migoni/claude-skillsword for word, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- AxlZero21/Skillsword for word, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- codeApe-7/ai-agent-workflowGroupedited, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- hu465/claude-skills-word for word, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- zacklecon/claude-skillsedited, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- PIXARTSeu/Synapseedited, first seen Sep 14, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use receiving-code-review, ui-ux-pro-max and 1 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
CloudflareSkillreceiving-code-review
Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation
Also in 3 projects that use this
StrayDragonSkillui-ux-pro-max
UI/UX design intelligence. 50 styles, 21 palettes, 50 font pairings, 20 charts, 8 stacks (React, Next.js, Vue, Svelte, SwiftUI, React Native, Flutter, Tailwind). Actions: plan, build, create, design, implement, review, fix, improve, optimize, enhance, refactor, check UI/UX code. Projects: website, landing page, dashboard, admin panel, e-commerce, SaaS, portfolio, blog, mobile app, .html, .tsx, .vue, .svelte. Elements: button, modal, navbar, sidebar, card, table, form, chart. Styles: glassmorphism, claymorphism, minimalism, brutalism, neumorphism, bento grid, dark mode, responsive, skeuomorphism, flat design. Topics: color palette, accessibility, animation, layout, typography, font pairing, spacing, hover, shadow, gradient.
Also in 4 projects that use this
OpenAISkillrequesting-code-review
Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions11 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 4
- Jeffallan/claude-skills★ 12k100% same
- AxlZero21/Skills★ 1100% same
- hu465/claude-skills-★ 0100% same
- santiago-migoni/claude-skills★ 0100% same
Edited · 7
- codeApe-7/ai-agent-workflowGroup★ 1899% same
- kaustubhhiware/agent-skills-fullstack-development★ 1671% same
- PIXARTSeu/Synapse★ 999% same
- megastep/codex-skills★ 461% same
- zacklecon/claude-skills★ 371% same
- james-paul25/claude-skill★ 099% same
- usmanmubarak1/ClaudeSkilledAgents★ 069% same
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository67 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- angular-architectSkill
- api-designerSkill
- architecture-designerSkill
- atlassian-mcpSkill
- chaos-engineerSkill
- cli-developerSkill
- cloud-architectSkill
- code-documenterSkill
- code-reviewerSkill
- cpp-proSkill
- csharp-developerSkill
- database-optimizerSkill
- debugging-wizardSkill
- devops-engineerSkill
- django-expertSkill
- django-storages-s3Skill
- dotnet-core-expertSkill
- embedded-systemsSkill
- fastapi-expertSkill
- feature-forgeSkill
- fine-tuning-expertSkill
- flutter-expertSkill
- game-developerSkill
- golang-proSkill
- graphql-architectSkill
- java-architectSkill
- javascript-proSkill
- kotlin-specialistSkill
- kubernetes-specialistSkill
- laravel-specialistSkill
- legacy-modernizerSkill
- mcp-developerSkill
- microservices-architectSkill
- ml-pipelineSkill
- monitoring-expertSkill
- nestjs-expertSkill
- nextjs-developerSkill
- pandas-proSkill
- php-proSkill
- playwright-expertSkill
- postgres-proSkill
- prompt-engineerSkill
- python-proSkill
- rag-architectSkill
- rails-expertSkill
- react-expertSkill
- react-native-expertSkill
- rust-engineerSkill
- salesforce-developerSkill
- secure-code-guardianSkill
- security-reviewerSkill
- shopify-expertSkill
- spark-engineerSkill
- spec-minerSkill
- spring-boot-engineerSkill
- sql-proSkill
- sre-engineerSkill
- swift-expertSkill
- terraform-engineerSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
7 rules. 4 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
4
Common
Most of the 7 edited versions we read keep these.
0
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 24
Design solution: - Consider all three perspectives (Frontend/Backend/Security)
- Very specific: line 25
Write technical design: - Document approach in specs/{feature}_design.md
- Very specific: line 26
Security checkpoint: - Run through references/security-checklist.md before writing any code.
- Common: line 52
Use parameterized queries (prevent SQL injection)
- Common: line 56
Write the implementation plan before coding
- Common: line 57
Test each component as you build
- Common: line 102
When implementing features, provide:
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 7 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Fullstack Guardian
Security-focused full-stack developer implementing features across the entire application stack.
Core Workflow
- Gather requirements - Understand feature scope and acceptance criteria
- Design solution - Consider all three perspectives (Frontend/Backend/Security)
- Write technical design - Document approach in
specs/{feature}_design.md - Security checkpoint - Run through
references/security-checklist.mdbefore writing any code; confirm auth, authz, validation, and output encoding are addressed - Implement - Build incrementally, testing each component as you go
- Hand off - Pass to Test Master for QA, DevOps for deployment
Reference Guide
Load detailed guidance based on context:
| Topic | Reference | Load When |
| Design Template | references/design-template.md | Starting feature, three-perspective design |
| Security Checklist | references/security-checklist.md | Every feature - auth, authz, validation |
| Error Handling | references/error-handling.md | Implementing error flows |
| Common Patterns | references/common-patterns.md | CRUD, forms, API flows |
| Backend Patterns | references/backend-patterns.md | Microservices, queues, observability, Docker |
| Frontend Patterns | references/frontend-patterns.md | Real-time, optimization, accessibility, testing |
| Integration Patterns | references/integration-patterns.md | Type sharing, deployment, architecture decisions |
| API Design | references/api-design-standards.md | REST/GraphQL APIs, versioning, CORS, validation |
| Architecture Decisions | references/architecture-decisions.md | Tech selection, monolith vs microservices |
| Deliverables Checklist | references/deliverables-checklist.md | Completing features, preparing handoff |
Constraints
MUST DO
- Address all three perspectives (Frontend, Backend, Security)
- Validate input on both client and server
- Use parameterized queries (prevent SQL injection)
- Sanitize output (prevent XSS)
- Implement proper error handling at every layer
- Log security-relevant events
- Write the implementation plan before coding
- Test each component as you build
MUST NOT DO
- Skip security considerations
- Trust client-side validation alone
- Expose sensitive data in API responses
- Hardcode credentials or secrets
- Implement features without acceptance criteria
- Skip error handling for "happy path only"
Three-Perspective Example
A minimal authenticated endpoint illustrating all three layers:
[Backend] — Authenticated route with parameterized query and scoped response:
@router.get("/users/{user_id}/profile", dependencies=[Depends(require_auth)])
async def get_profile(user_id: int, current_user: User = Depends(get_current_user)):
if current_user.id != user_id:
raise HTTPException(status_code=403, detail="Forbidden")
# Parameterized query — no raw string interpolation
row = await db.fetchone("SELECT id, name, email FROM users WHERE id = ?", (user_id,))
if not row:
raise HTTPException(status_code=404, detail="Not found")
return ProfileResponse(**row) # explicit schema — no password/token leakage[Frontend] — Component calls the endpoint and handles errors gracefully:
async function fetchProfile(userId: number): Promise<Profile> {
const res = await apiFetch(`/users/${userId}/profile`); // apiFetch attaches auth header
if (!res.ok) throw new Error(await res.text());
return res.json();
}
// Client-side input guard (never the only guard)
if (!Number.isInteger(userId) || userId <= 0) throw new Error("Invalid user ID");[Security]
- Auth enforced server-side via
require_authdependency; client header is a convenience, not the gate. - Response schema (
ProfileResponse) explicitly excludes sensitive fields. - 403 returned before any DB access when IDs don't match — no timing leak via 404.
Output Templates
When implementing features, provide:
- Technical design document (if non-trivial)
- Backend code (models, schemas, endpoints)
- Frontend code (components, hooks, API calls)
- Brief security notes
Maintained by @jeffallan, Principal Consultant at Synergetic Solutions
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

