agentleFS
lsyamsiarlsyamsiar/claude-skills/skills/debugging-wizard/SKILL.md

debugging-wizard

Skill0 starsChanged 11 months agoMITView on GitHub

Parses error messages, traces execution flow through stack traces, correlates log entries to identify failure points, and applies systematic hypothesis-driven methodology to isolate and resolve bugs. Use when investigating errors, analyzing stack traces, finding root causes of unexpected behavior, troubleshooting crashes, or performing log analysis, error investigation, or root cause analysis.

15 other projects use a version of this, 11 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

7 rules. 7 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 7

    Common

    Most of the 11 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 0

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Common:

    Prevent: - Add tests/safeguards against regression

    line 27
  2. Common:

    Test one hypothesis at a time

    line 48
  3. Common:

    Document findings for future reference

    line 49
  4. Common:

    Add regression tests after fixing

    line 50
  5. Common:

    Remove all debug code before committing

    line 51
  6. Common:

    Leave console.log/debugger statements in code

    line 59
  7. Common:

    Prevention: Test or safeguard to prevent recurrence

    line 106

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 11 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Debugging Wizard

Expert debugger applying systematic methodology to isolate and resolve issues in any codebase.

Core Workflow

  1. Reproduce - Establish consistent reproduction steps
  2. Isolate - Narrow down to smallest failing case
  3. Hypothesize and test - Form testable theories, verify/disprove each one
  4. Fix - Implement and verify solution
  5. Prevent - Add tests/safeguards against regression

Reference Guide

Load detailed guidance based on context:

<!-- Systematic Debugging row adapted from obra/superpowers by Jesse Vincent (@obra), MIT License -->
TopicReferenceLoad When
Debugging Toolsreferences/debugging-tools.mdSetting up debuggers by language
Common Patternsreferences/common-patterns.mdRecognizing bug patterns
Strategiesreferences/strategies.mdBinary search, git bisect, time travel
Quick Fixesreferences/quick-fixes.mdCommon error solutions
Systematic Debuggingreferences/systematic-debugging.mdComplex bugs, multiple failed fixes, root cause analysis

Constraints

MUST DO

  • Reproduce the issue first
  • Gather complete error messages and stack traces
  • Test one hypothesis at a time
  • Document findings for future reference
  • Add regression tests after fixing
  • Remove all debug code before committing

MUST NOT DO

  • Guess without testing
  • Make multiple changes at once
  • Skip reproduction steps
  • Assume you know the cause
  • Debug in production without safeguards
  • Leave console.log/debugger statements in code

Common Debugging Commands

Python (pdb)

python -m pdb script.py          # launch debugger
# inside pdb:
# b 42          — set breakpoint at line 42
# n             — step over
# s             — step into
# p some_var    — print variable
# bt            — print full traceback

JavaScript (Node.js)

node --inspect-brk script.js     # pause at first line, attach Chrome DevTools
# In Chrome: open chrome://inspect → click "inspect"
# Sources panel: add breakpoints, watch expressions, step through

Git bisect (regression hunting)

git bisect start
git bisect bad                   # current commit is broken
git bisect good v1.2.0           # last known good tag/commit
# Git checks out midpoint — test, then:
git bisect good   # or: git bisect bad
# Repeat until git identifies the first bad commit
git bisect reset

Go (delve)

dlv debug ./cmd/server           # build & attach
# (dlv) break main.go:55
# (dlv) continue
# (dlv) print myVar

Output Templates

When debugging, provide:

  1. Root Cause: What specifically caused the issue
  2. Evidence: Stack trace, logs, or test that proves it
  3. Fix: Code change that resolves it
  4. Prevention: Test or safeguard to prevent recurrence

Maintained by @jeffallan, Principal Consultant at Synergetic Solutions

Documentation

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.