agentleFS
lsyamsiarlsyamsiar/claude-skills/skills/database-optimizer/SKILL.md

database-optimizer

Skill0 starsChanged 11 months agoMITView on GitHub

Optimizes database queries and improves performance across PostgreSQL and MySQL systems. Use when investigating slow queries, analyzing execution plans, or optimizing database performance. Invoke for index design, query rewrites, configuration tuning, partitioning strategies, lock contention resolution.

25 other projects use a version of this, 9 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

6 rules. 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 19 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 4

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Create indexes with CONCURRENTLY (PostgreSQL) to avoid table locks

    line 128
  2. Distinctive:

    Test in non-production; roll back if write performance or replication lag worsens

    line 129
  3. Distinctive:

    Document all optimization decisions with before/after metrics

    line 130
  4. Very specific:

    Run ANALYZE after bulk data changes to refresh statistics

    line 131
  5. Distinctive:

    Create redundant or unused indexes

    line 135
  6. Distinctive:

    When optimizing database performance, provide:

    line 142

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 19 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Database Optimizer

Senior database optimizer with expertise in performance tuning, query optimization, and scalability across multiple database systems.

When to Use This Skill

  • Analyzing slow queries and execution plans
  • Designing optimal index strategies
  • Tuning database configuration parameters
  • Optimizing schema design and partitioning
  • Reducing lock contention and deadlocks
  • Improving cache hit rates and memory usage

Core Workflow

  1. Analyze Performance — Capture baseline metrics and run EXPLAIN ANALYZE before any changes
  2. Identify Bottlenecks — Find inefficient queries, missing indexes, config issues
  3. Design Solutions — Create index strategies, query rewrites, schema improvements
  4. Implement Changes — Apply optimizations incrementally with monitoring; validate each change before proceeding to the next
  5. Validate Results — Re-run EXPLAIN ANALYZE, compare costs, measure wall-clock improvement, document changes

⚠️ Always test changes in non-production first. Revert immediately if write performance degrades or replication lag increases.

Reference Guide

Load detailed guidance based on context:

TopicReferenceLoad When
Query Optimizationreferences/query-optimization.mdAnalyzing slow queries, execution plans
Index Strategiesreferences/index-strategies.mdDesigning indexes, covering indexes
PostgreSQL Tuningreferences/postgresql-tuning.mdPostgreSQL-specific optimizations
MySQL Tuningreferences/mysql-tuning.mdMySQL-specific optimizations
Monitoring & Analysisreferences/monitoring-analysis.mdPerformance metrics, diagnostics

Common Operations & Examples

Identify Top Slow Queries (PostgreSQL)

-- Requires pg_stat_statements extension
SELECT query,
       calls,
       round(total_exec_time::numeric, 2)  AS total_ms,
       round(mean_exec_time::numeric, 2)   AS mean_ms,
       round(stddev_exec_time::numeric, 2) AS stddev_ms,
       rows
FROM   pg_stat_statements
ORDER  BY mean_exec_time DESC
LIMIT  20;

Capture an Execution Plan

-- Use BUFFERS to expose cache hit vs. disk read ratio
EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, BUFFERS, FORMAT TEXT)
SELECT o.id, c.name
FROM   orders o
JOIN   customers c ON c.id = o.customer_id
WHERE  o.status = 'pending'
  AND  o.created_at > now() - interval '7 days';

Reading EXPLAIN Output — Key Patterns to Find

PatternSymptomTypical Remedy
Seq Scan on large tableHigh row estimate, no filter selectivityAdd B-tree index on filter column
Nested Loop with large outer setExponential row growth in inner loopConsider Hash Join; index inner join key
cost=... rows=1 but actual rows=50000Stale statisticsRun ANALYZE <table>;
Buffers: hit=10 read=90000Low buffer cache hit rateIncrease shared_buffers; add covering index
Sort Method: external mergeSort spilling to diskIncrease work_mem for the session

Create a Covering Index

-- Covers the filter AND the projected columns, eliminating a heap fetch
CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY idx_orders_status_created_covering
    ON orders (status, created_at)
    INCLUDE (customer_id, total_amount);

Validate Improvement

-- Before optimization: save plan & timing
EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, BUFFERS) <query>;   -- note "Execution Time: X ms"

-- After optimization: compare
EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, BUFFERS) <query>;   -- target meaningful reduction in cost & time

-- Confirm index is actually used
SELECT indexname, idx_scan, idx_tup_read, idx_tup_fetch
FROM   pg_stat_user_indexes
WHERE  relname = 'orders';

MySQL: Find Slow Queries

-- Inspect slow query log candidates
SELECT * FROM performance_schema.events_statements_summary_by_digest
ORDER  BY SUM_TIMER_WAIT DESC
LIMIT  20;

-- Execution plan
EXPLAIN FORMAT=JSON
SELECT * FROM orders WHERE status = 'pending' AND created_at > NOW() - INTERVAL 7 DAY;

Constraints

MUST DO

  • Capture EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, BUFFERS) output before optimizing — this is the baseline
  • Measure performance before and after every change
  • Create indexes with CONCURRENTLY (PostgreSQL) to avoid table locks
  • Test in non-production; roll back if write performance or replication lag worsens
  • Document all optimization decisions with before/after metrics
  • Run ANALYZE after bulk data changes to refresh statistics

MUST NOT DO

  • Apply optimizations without a measured baseline
  • Create redundant or unused indexes
  • Make multiple changes simultaneously (impossible to attribute impact)
  • Ignore write amplification caused by new indexes
  • Neglect VACUUM / statistics maintenance

Output Templates

When optimizing database performance, provide:

  1. Performance analysis with baseline metrics (query time, cost, buffer hit ratio)
  2. Identified bottlenecks and root causes (with EXPLAIN evidence)
  3. Optimization strategy with specific changes
  4. Implementation SQL / config changes
  5. Validation queries to measure improvement
  6. Monitoring recommendations

Maintained by @jeffallan, Principal Consultant at Synergetic Solutions

Documentation

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.