code-reviewer
Skill2 starsChanged 32 days agoMITView on GitHub
Runs NorthStar Detection → Investigation → Verification → Review pipeline and writes evidence-only code review reports
182 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- santiago-migoni/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- SaehwanPark/agent-skills-archivetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- nainishshafi/developer-productivity-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Flowerf19/agents-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- darkweb19/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- kazemcodes/skill-treetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use git-doc-updater, git-precommit and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
u9401066Skillgit-doc-updater
Auto-check and update key documentation before Git commits to keep docs in sync with code. Triggers: docs, 文檔, 更新文檔, sync docs, release, 發布.
Also in 5 projects that use this
u9401066Skillgit-precommit
Orchestrate pre-commit workflow including Memory Bank sync, README/CHANGELOG/ROADMAP updates. Triggers: GIT, gc, push, commit, 提交, 準備 commit, 要提交了, git commit, pre-commit, 推送.
Also in 5 projects that use this
JeffallanSkillshopify-expert
Builds and debugs Shopify themes (.liquid files, theme.json, sections), develops custom Shopify apps (shopify.app.toml, OAuth, webhooks), and implements Storefront API integrations for headless storefronts. Use when building or customizing Shopify themes, creating Hydrogen or custom React storefronts, developing Shopify apps, implementing checkout UI extensions or Shopify Functions, optimizing performance, or integrating third-party services. Invoke for Liquid templating, Storefront API, app development, checkout customization, Shopify Plus features, App Bridge, Polaris, or Shopify CLI workflows.
Also in 5 projects that use this
JeffallanSkillspec-miner
Reverse-engineering specialist that extracts specifications from existing codebases. Use when working with legacy or undocumented systems, inherited projects, or old codebases with no documentation. Invoke to map code dependencies, generate API documentation from source, identify undocumented business logic, figure out what code does, or create architecture documentation from implementation. Trigger phrases: reverse engineer, old codebase, no docs, no documentation, figure out how this works, inherited project, legacy analysis, code archaeology, undocumented features.
Also in 6 projects that use this
- +4 more from u9401066
- +4 more from Jeffallan
Other versions182 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 182
- google-gemini/gemini-cli★ 109ksame name
- NVIDIA/SkillSpector★ 25ksame name
- Jeffallan/claude-skills★ 12ksame name
- jewbetcha/openflight★ 1.2ksame name
- web-infra-dev/rsdoctor★ 1.2ksame name
- zhnnky329/MathModeling-skills★ 1.1ksame name
- MageByte-Zero/spec-superflow★ 875same name
- waybarrios/opencode-power-pack★ 547same name
- Karanjot786/TermUI★ 238same name
- elithrar/dotfiles★ 222same name
172 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository52 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- .cursor/rules/00-core-operating-model.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/01-plan-approval-gate.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/02-git-worktree-policy.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/03-validation-definition-of-done.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/04-documentation-memory.mdcCursor rule
- accessibility-reviewSkill
- agent-skills-packagingSkill
- autonomy-budgetSkill
- bounded-autonomySkill
- candidate-promotionSkill
- capability-planningSkill
- code-structure-cleanupSkill
- compass-evaluatorSkill
- context-inodesSkill
- dependency-supply-chainSkill
- docker-cloudSkill
- embedding-providersSkill
- execution-telemetrySkill
- experience-routingSkill
- experience-skill-trainingSkill
- external-knowledge-ingestSkill
- github-integrationSkill
- goose-agent-orchestrationSkill
- harness-gcSkill
- hosted-vector-dbSkill
- implementation-planningSkill
- ios-engineeringSkill
- knowledge-stewardSkill
- linear-integrationSkill
- node-engineeringSkill
- northstar-connected-routineSkill
- notion-integrationSkill
- package-registry-tiSkill
- persistent-role-promotionSkill
- playwright-browser-validationSkill
- postgres-prismaSkill
- procedure-playbooksSkill
- project-overseerSkill
- pull-request-preparationSkill
- python-mlSkill
- react-engineeringSkill
- repository-discoverySkill
- review-fix-loopSkill
- security-audit-proceduresSkill
- security-reviewSkill
- skill-learning-loopSkill
- skill-lifecycleSkill
- source-code-contextSkill
- technology-intelligence-liveSkill
- testing-validationSkill
- worktree-orchestrationSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 155 edited versions we read keep these.
0
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 57
When the repo has a built inode store (Skill context-inodes), the pipeline emits deterministic boundary candidates for calls/imports that …
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 155 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Code Reviewer
Use this Skill when
A branch, PR, or local diff needs a structured NorthStar code review that:
- loads intent from
IMPLEMENTATION_PLAN.md,INTENT_PACK.md, or--intent-json(normalizednorthstar.intent_pack.v1; never sets Captain approval) - investigates changed files + related neighbors
- verifies candidate findings before reporting
- writes evidence under
.agent/evidence/code-review/<run-id>/
Inputs
- Repository root (control or sandbox)
- Optional git base/head refs, unified diff file, or changed-path list
- Optional fixture candidates JSON (required for hermetic CI / no model)
- Optional plan path (defaults to
IMPLEMENTATION_PLAN.md/INTENT_PACK.mdauto-discover) - Optional
--intent-jsonnormalized intent pack (M29)
Procedure
- Detect — identify domains from changed paths; load plan or intent-pack acceptance criteria / non-goals.
- Investigate — assemble a context pack (diff excerpt, changed file snippets, neighbors). Redact secrets.
- Candidates — default specialists mode composes hermetic security / adversarial / testing emitters (M28). Use
--candidatesfixtures in CI;--candidates-mode heuristicsis the M27 escape hatch. No model in the default path. - Verify — discard findings below confidence threshold or without evidence paths.
- Report — write
report.json+report.mdunder.agent/evidence/code-review/<run-id>/. - Hand verified findings to humans or
review-fix-loop. Never auto-merge. GitHub draft posting is opt-in (--post-github-draft) and allowlist-gated (M30); default remains evidence-only. - Outcomes (M31) — after human triage, record outcomes → Experience (optional RoutingProposal is proposal-only).
- Repair (M32 / B4) — for verified findings only,
northstar repair startbuilds a FIND→PROVE→dispatch packet. Never auto-merges. Captain authorization required before FIX/SUBMIT. - Precision (M33 / B5) — aggregate finding outcomes into a precision ledger + dashboard; optional priority proposal never auto-applies.
CLI
# From control repo
./scripts/run-code-review.sh --repo-root /path/to/repo --plan IMPLEMENTATION_PLAN.md
./scripts/run-code-review.sh --repo-root /path/to/repo --intent-json .agent/intent/current.json
./scripts/northstar review --repo /path/to/repo --candidates-mode specialists
./scripts/northstar review --repo /path/to/repo --candidates tests/fixtures/code-review/candidates.json
./scripts/northstar intent export --out .agent/intent/current.json --fixture issue.json
./scripts/northstar outcomes record --report path/to/report.json --triage path/to/triage.json
./scripts/record-finding-outcomes.sh --report path/to/report.json --triage path/to/triage.json --emit-routing-proposal
./scripts/northstar repair start --report path/to/report.json --finding <id> --repository loganware05/captain-compass-sandbox
./scripts/start-repair-loop.sh --report path/to/report.json --finding <id> --repository loganware05/captain-compass-sandbox
./scripts/northstar precision aggregate --outcomes path/to/outcomes.json --emit-priority-proposal
./scripts/aggregate-precision-ledger.sh --outcomes path/to/outcomes.json --ledger-id demoM40: cross-boundary verification gate
When the repo has a built inode store (Skill context-inodes), the pipeline
emits deterministic boundary candidates for calls/imports that cross
context routes (domain/module):
boundary-unknown-symbol(high) — import names a symbol the callee inode does not exportboundary-arity(medium) — added call site passes an argument count the declared signature cannot acceptboundary-complexity(medium) — added call inside an added loop invokes a callee with non-constant declared@complexity(e.g. declared (O(N)) called per element ⇒ effective (O(N^2)))
The gate is on by default (--boundary-check); it skips with an explicit
note when the inode store is absent or stale — never review against
untrusted metadata. Boundary findings carry category: boundary and flow
through the standard verify/rank path. Precision target on fixture + sandbox
corpora: 1.0 (measured in tests/evals/run.sh M40 sensors).
Output
- Schema-valid
report.json(code-review-report.schema.json) - Human-readable
report.md - Optional
context-pack.json - Optional triage
outcomes.json+ Experience lessons; optional RoutingProposal (auto_apply=false) - Optional repair
repair-run.json+dispatch-packet.jsonunder.agent/evidence/repair/<run-id>/ - Report provenance records
boundarynotes/candidate counts
Prohibited actions
- Auto-applying RoutingProposal / Skill confidence deltas (Captain gate only)
- Invoking models in CI / default hermetic path
- Auto-merging or auto-fixing without a separate approved plan
- Repairing unverified or discarded findings
- Expanding webhook
pull_requesthandling in this Skill - Treating Linear as Captain approval authority
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

