agentleFS
loganware05loganware05/captains-compass-cursor/.cursor/skills/capability-planning/SKILL.md

capability-planning

Skill2 starsChanged 32 days agoMITView on GitHub

Runs the capability-aware planning pipeline and renders IMPLEMENTATION_PLAN sections

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

6 rules. About 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈5

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Ensure registry is current: ./scripts/compile-capability-registry.sh

    line 29
  2. Distinctive:

    Run the planning pipeline:

    line 30
  3. Distinctive:

    If Capability Gaps are present, surface them explicitly — do not silently improvise.

    line 46
  4. Distinctive:

    Do not treat Technology Intelligence candidates as approved Skills

    line 81
  5. Distinctive:

    Do not begin product implementation

    line 82
  6. Distinctive:

    Do not omit capability gap sections when gaps exist

    line 83

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Capability-Aware Planning

Use this Skill when

The First Mate is writing or updating IMPLEMENTATION_PLAN.md for a non-trivial objective and needs machine-assisted:

  • required capability inference
  • Skill discovery and ranking
  • task graph decomposition
  • agent manifest proposals

Load this Skill together with implementation-planning during /plan-feature.

Inputs

  • User objective / request text
  • Repository root
  • Optional context: stacks, PROJECT_CONTEXT.md excerpt, discovery summary
  • Plan ID (defaults to draft until issue assigned)

Procedure

  1. Ensure registry is current: ./scripts/compile-capability-registry.sh
  2. Run the planning pipeline:

    ./scripts/capability-plan.sh --plan-id <plan-id> "<objective>"
  3. Copy rendered sections into IMPLEMENTATION_PLAN.md:
    • Required Capabilities
    • Reusable Capabilities Found
    • Technology Intelligence Candidates
    • Task Graph
    • Proposed Agent Configuration
    • Evaluation Strategy
    • Learning Plan
    • Approval Boundary
  4. Complete human-authored sections (Problem Statement, Acceptance Criteria, risks, etc.) using implementation-planning.
  5. If Capability Gaps are present, surface them explicitly — do not silently improvise.
  6. Set plan status to AWAITING APPROVAL and stop.

Machine artifacts

Written under .agent/plans/<plan-id>/:

  • resolve.json
  • task-graph.json
  • manifests.json

M40: typed dependency links + subagent pwd

task-graph.json dependencies carry explicit link types (backward compatible):

  • string form (legacy) — pure ordering edge
  • hard link — { "target", "link": "hard", "contract" }: version-locked contract coupling; both sides must change together (e.g. implementation tasks hard-link the architecture-brief contract)
  • symlink — { "target", "link": "symlink", "paths" }: loose module / artifact path reference (e.g. validation symlinks implementation artifacts)

Manifests include a working_context block (the subagent pwd): context_root (scoped route in .agent/context/), inode_refs (only the in-scope module's inode pointers), and scope_allow / scope_deny path lists. Disjoint module tasks must not share inode refs — that isolation invariant is checked by the M40 eval sensor. Build the inode store first (Skill context-inodes) or manifests degrade to unrestricted scope with a note.

Output

Capability-aware plan sections ready for Captain review.

Prohibited actions

  • Do not treat Technology Intelligence candidates as approved Skills
  • Do not begin product implementation
  • Do not omit capability gap sections when gaps exist

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.