captains-compass-cursor / rules
Cursor rule2 starsChanged 31 days agoMITView on GitHub
Requires implementation-plan approval before product changes
Where files are headingNew Cursor rule files have more rules about planning and tracking tasks, and fewer about code style.
Of the Cursor rule files we read, the 4,183 first seen in the last six months, against the older ones: the kind of rule that gained most share, and the kind that lost most. About files like this in general, not this one, and an estimate, since a kind is a pattern in the words.
In this repository52 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- .cursor/rules/00-core-operating-model.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/02-git-worktree-policy.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/03-validation-definition-of-done.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/04-documentation-memory.mdcCursor rule
- accessibility-reviewSkill
- agent-skills-packagingSkill
- autonomy-budgetSkill
- bounded-autonomySkill
- candidate-promotionSkill
- capability-planningSkill
- code-reviewerSkill
- code-structure-cleanupSkill
- compass-evaluatorSkill
- context-inodesSkill
- dependency-supply-chainSkill
- docker-cloudSkill
- embedding-providersSkill
- execution-telemetrySkill
- experience-routingSkill
- experience-skill-trainingSkill
- external-knowledge-ingestSkill
- github-integrationSkill
- goose-agent-orchestrationSkill
- harness-gcSkill
- hosted-vector-dbSkill
- implementation-planningSkill
- ios-engineeringSkill
- knowledge-stewardSkill
- linear-integrationSkill
- node-engineeringSkill
- northstar-connected-routineSkill
- notion-integrationSkill
- package-registry-tiSkill
- persistent-role-promotionSkill
- playwright-browser-validationSkill
- postgres-prismaSkill
- procedure-playbooksSkill
- project-overseerSkill
- pull-request-preparationSkill
- python-mlSkill
- react-engineeringSkill
- repository-discoverySkill
- review-fix-loopSkill
- security-audit-proceduresSkill
- security-reviewSkill
- skill-learning-loopSkill
- skill-lifecycleSkill
- source-code-contextSkill
- technology-intelligence-liveSkill
- testing-validationSkill
- worktree-orchestrationSkill
The file
We split this 01-plan-approval-gate.mdc into the rules it gives an agent
7 rules. About 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈6
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 10
Create or update IMPLEMENTATION_PLAN.md.
- Distinctive: line 13
Stop before changing product implementation files.
- Distinctive: line 21
Create or reference the issue.
- Distinctive: line 22
Create a rollback checkpoint.
- Distinctive: line 23
Create the feature branch and necessary worktrees.
- Distinctive: line 26
If asked to skip the plan and implement immediately, refuse and create the plan first.
- Distinctive: line 28
If scope expands materially during implementation, update the plan and return to the approval gate.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 6,668 Cursor rule files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
--- description: Requires implementation-plan approval before product changes alwaysApply: true --- For any request that changes product behavior: 1. Investigate the current implementation. 2. Identify requirements, assumptions, risks, and dependencies. 3. Create or update IMPLEMENTATION_PLAN.md. 4. Set its status to AWAITING APPROVAL. 5. Present the plan to the Captain. 6. Stop before changing product implementation files. Implementation may begin only after explicit approval. After approval: 1. Record the approval in IMPLEMENTATION_PLAN.md. 2. Set the plan status to APPROVED. 3. Create or reference the issue. 4. Create a rollback checkpoint. 5. Create the feature branch and necessary worktrees. 6. Begin implementation. If asked to skip the plan and implement immediately, refuse and create the plan first. If scope expands materially during implementation, update the plan and return to the approval gate.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

