agentleFS
liushikuan63liushikuan63/Qoder-Optimization/skills/redis-semantic-cache/SKILL.md

redis-semantic-cache

Skill2 starsChanged 14 days agoMITView on GitHub

Redis LangCache guidance for semantic caching of LLM responses on Redis Cloud — calling search/set via the SDK or REST API, tuning the similarity threshold, separating caches per task type, and filtering with custom attributes。中文触发:Redis 缓存 键值 TTL 集群 向量检索 全文检索 接口 检索

  • Reads credentials

2 other projects use a version of this, 2 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

Files
SKILL.md

Redis Semantic Cache

Semantic caching for LLM responses with Redis Cloud's LangCache service. Stores prompts as embeddings; subsequent semantically-similar prompts return the cached response without re-calling the model.

LangCache is currently in preview on Redis Cloud. Features and behavior may change.

When to apply

  • Wrapping an LLM call (OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.) with a cache layer to cut cost and latency.
  • Caching RAG answers, classification outputs, or any deterministic LLM workload.
  • Tuning the precision/hit-rate trade-off for a semantic cache.
  • Splitting one application's LLM workloads across multiple cache instances.

1. The cache-aside flow

LangCache fits in front of any LLM call as a standard cache-aside pattern:

  1. Send the user's prompt to LangCache's search.
  2. Cache hit — return the stored response directly.
  3. Cache miss — call the LLM, then set the response so future similar prompts hit.
from langcache import LangCache
import os

lang_cache = LangCache(
    server_url=f"https://{os.getenv('HOST')}",
    cache_id=os.getenv("CACHE_ID"),
    api_key=os.getenv("API_KEY"),
)

result = lang_cache.search(prompt="What is Redis?", similarity_threshold=0.9)
if result:
    response = result[0]["response"]
else:
    response = llm.generate("What is Redis?")
    lang_cache.set(prompt="What is Redis?", response=response)

The same operations are available via REST (POST /v1/caches/{cacheId}/entries/search and POST /v1/caches/{cacheId}/entries) when an SDK isn't an option.

See references/langcache-usage.md for full SDK + REST samples and attribute-based storage.

2. Tune the similarity threshold

The threshold controls how close (in embedding cosine distance) a new prompt must be to a cached one to count as a hit. Higher = stricter match, fewer false positives. Lower = more hits, more risk of returning an off-topic answer.

ThresholdBehaviorUse when
0.95+Near-exact match requiredCustomer-facing answers where wrong responses are costly
0.9Balanced defaultMost workloads — start here
0.8Loose semantic matchInternal tools, exploratory queries, FAQ deduplication
# Stricter — fewer false positives
result = lang_cache.search(prompt="What is Redis?", similarity_threshold=0.95)

# Looser — higher hit rate
result = lang_cache.search(prompt="What is Redis?", similarity_threshold=0.8)

Adjust by watching the actual cache-hit rate and spot-checking that returned answers are still relevant.

See references/best-practices.md.

3. Separate caches per task type

Different LLM workloads should not share one cache — a "code question" prompt is semantically close to other code questions but has nothing to do with a password-reset support query, and crossing them returns garbage.

support_cache = LangCache(server_url=..., cache_id="support-cache-id", api_key=...)
code_cache    = LangCache(server_url=..., cache_id="code-cache-id",    api_key=...)

Create distinct cache IDs in Redis Cloud per task, and route each call to the right one. As a finer-grained alternative, store and search with custom attributes (e.g. {"category": "database"}) to keep tasks in the same cache but isolated by attribute filter — useful when the same prompt format spans subtopics.

References

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.