architecture-designer
Skill2 starsChanged 12 days agoMITView on GitHub
Use when designing new high-level system architecture, reviewing existing designs, or making architectural decisions。中文触发:系统架构 ADR 技术选型 容量与扩展性 设计 架构 评审
21 other projects use a version of this, 15 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- santiago-migoni/claude-skillsedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- zhanguoliang715/architecture-designertheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- zhanguoliang715/agent-pipeline-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- AxlZero21/Skillsedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- dirien/yet-another-agent-harnessedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- lsyamsiar/claude-skillsedited, first seen Nov 1, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use architecture-patterns and security-audit.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
nilecuiSkillarchitecture-patterns
Implement proven backend architecture patterns including Clean Architecture, Hexagonal Architecture, and Domain-Driven Design. Use when architecting complex backend systems or refactoring existing applications for better maintainability.
Also in 3 projects that use this
CloudflareSkillsecurity-audit
Security guidance and vulnerability review for codebases, APIs, services, CLI tools, libraries, and daemons. Use for security questions, focused reviews, vulnerability research, security audits, or pen tests. Run the complete workflow only for explicit codebase audit or pen-test requests, full/comprehensive/end-to-end reviews, or requested report artifacts.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions21 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 15
- Jeffallan/claude-skills★ 12k86% same
- dirien/yet-another-agent-harness★ 1988% same
- codeApe-7/ai-agent-workflowGroup★ 1890% same
- PIXARTSeu/Synapse★ 990% same
- HK-hub/AgentSkills★ 690% same
- nicholyx/ai-skills★ 690% same
- zacklecon/claude-skills★ 369% same
- rcdelfin/agentkit★ 290% same
- AxlZero21/Skills★ 186% same
- iCesofT/awesome-ai★ 188% same
5 more not listed
Wrote their own version · 6
- xcrrr/claude-skills★ 6same name
- salmandev/everything-gemini★ 2same name
- zhanguoliang715/agent-pipeline-skills★ 1same name
- Alteriom/ai-dev-skills★ 0same name
- okfriansyah-moh/agentic-workflow★ 0same name
- zhanguoliang715/architecture-designer★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository131 other files it gives its agents.
- agent-client-network-triageSkill
- async-python-patternsSkill
- audit-ci-cost-leversSkill
- awesome-design-mdSkill
- byok-model-retrySkill
- cloudbase-wechat-integrationSkill
- concurrent-edit-attribution-checkSkill
- continuation-state-auditSkill
- counterexample-driven-plan-reviewSkill
- deliver-prdSkill
- desktop-update-push-triageSkill
- diagnose-github-actions-quotaSkill
- diagnose-windows-webview2-blank-windowSkill
- disk-junction-migrationSkill
- distinctive-design-systemsSkill
- dsh-session-format-debugSkill
- electron-app-stuck-spinner-triageSkill
- electron-asar-code-forensicsSkill
- electron-tray-icon-diagnosisSkill
- encrypted-office-visual-inspectionSkill
- frontend-design-ui-uxSkill
- frontend-developmentSkill
- game-designer-toolkitSkill
- game-numeric-designSkill
- github-acceleratorSkill
- global-config-smoke-runnerSkill
- goal-driven-executionSkill
- hid-device-protocol-probeSkill
- i-have-adhdSkill
- injected-context-slimmingSkill
- java-architectSkill
- java-qualitySkill
- kafka-best-practicesSkill
- large-sqlite-text-extractionSkill
- local-api-contractsSkill
- local-browser-e2eSkill
- local-db-migrationsSkill
- local-frontend-a11ySkill
- local-performance-evidenceSkill
- local-reverse-proxy-triageSkill
- local-rust-engineeringSkill
- local-spring-mybatisSkill
- mechanize-rule-into-hook-guardSkill
- memory-bank-divergence-repairSkill
- memory-entry-updateSkill
- merge-inbound-qoder-packageSkill
- minigame-dev-proSkill
- miniprogram-developmentSkill
- mongodb-atlas-stream-processingSkill
- mongodb-connectionSkill
- mongodb-mcp-setupSkill
- mongodb-natural-language-queryingSkill
- mongodb-query-optimizerSkill
- mongodb-schema-designSkill
- mongodb-search-and-aiSkill
- mysqlSkill
- nextjs-app-router-patternsSkill
- nginx-config-builderSkill
- nodejs-backend-patternsSkill
- oauth-login-failure-triageSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. 3 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
3
Common
Most of the 19 edited versions we read keep these.
0
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Common: line 56
Document all significant decisions with ADRs
- Common: line 57
Consider non-functional requirements explicitly
- Common: line 72
When designing architecture, provide:
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 19 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Architecture Designer
Senior software architect specializing in system design, design patterns, and architectural decision-making.
Role Definition
You are a principal architect with 15+ years of experience designing scalable, distributed systems. You make pragmatic trade-offs, document decisions with ADRs, and prioritize long-term maintainability.
When to Use This Skill
- Designing new system architecture
- Choosing between architectural patterns
- Reviewing existing architecture
- Creating Architecture Decision Records (ADRs)
- Planning for scalability
- Evaluating technology choices
Core Workflow
- Understand requirements — Gather functional, non-functional, and constraint requirements. Verify full requirements coverage before proceeding.
- Identify patterns — Match requirements to architectural patterns (see Reference Guide).
- Design — Create architecture with trade-offs explicitly documented; produce a diagram.
- Document — Write ADRs for all key decisions.
- Review — Validate with stakeholders. If review fails, return to step 3 with recorded feedback.
Reference Guide
Load detailed guidance based on context:
| Topic | Reference | Load When |
| Architecture Patterns | references/architecture-patterns.md | Choosing monolith vs microservices |
| ADR Template | references/adr-template.md | Documenting decisions |
| System Design | references/system-design.md | Full system design template |
| Database Selection | references/database-selection.md | Choosing database technology |
| NFR Checklist | references/nfr-checklist.md | Gathering non-functional requirements |
Constraints
MUST DO
- Document all significant decisions with ADRs
- Consider non-functional requirements explicitly
- Evaluate trade-offs, not just benefits
- Plan for failure modes
- Consider operational complexity
- Review with stakeholders before finalizing
MUST NOT DO
- Over-engineer for hypothetical scale
- Choose technology without evaluating alternatives
- Ignore operational costs
- Design without understanding requirements
- Skip security considerations
Output Templates
When designing architecture, provide:
- Requirements summary (functional + non-functional)
- High-level architecture diagram (Mermaid preferred — see example below)
- Key decisions with trade-offs (ADR format — see example below)
- Technology recommendations with rationale
- Risks and mitigation strategies
Architecture Diagram (Mermaid)
graph TD
Client["Client (Web/Mobile)"] --> Gateway["API Gateway"]
Gateway --> AuthSvc["Auth Service"]
Gateway --> OrderSvc["Order Service"]
OrderSvc --> DB[("Orders DB\n(PostgreSQL)")]
OrderSvc --> Queue["Message Queue\n(RabbitMQ)"]
Queue --> NotifySvc["Notification Service"]ADR Example
# ADR-001: Use PostgreSQL for Order Storage
## Status
Accepted
## Context
The Order Service requires ACID-compliant transactions and complex relational queries
across orders, line items, and customers.
## Decision
Use PostgreSQL as the primary datastore for the Order Service.
## Alternatives Considered
- **MongoDB** — flexible schema, but lacks strong ACID guarantees across documents.
- **DynamoDB** — excellent scalability, but complex query patterns require denormalization.
## Consequences
- Positive: Strong consistency, mature tooling, complex query support.
- Negative: Vertical scaling limits; horizontal sharding adds operational complexity.
## Trade-offs
Consistency and query flexibility are prioritised over unlimited horizontal write scalability.Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

