agentleFS
link7373link7373/agentic-pmo/.claude/skills/make-deliverable/SKILL.md

make-deliverable

Skill1 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub

Produce a stakeholder-ready deliverable — executive summary, status update, steering-committee/board deck, or announcement — tailored to a specific audience. Use to package PMO substance for communication. Dispatches the comms-lead. Supports optional tool sync.

1 other project uses a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

5 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈1

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 4

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Use RAG with reason + action.

    line 23
  2. Very specific:

    Put detail in appendices or link to the canonical knowledge/ artifact.

    line 25
  3. Very specific:

    Check every number traces to a knowledge/ file.

    line 26
  4. Very specific:

    Start from the matching template — templates/exec-update.md, templates/status-report.md, or templates/steerco-pack.md for a steering …

    line 33
  5. Very specific:

    If knowledge/integrations.md configures Slack/Notion, offer to post/share the deliverable there.

    line 41

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

/make-deliverable — Package it for the audience

When to use

Turning PMO substance (status, roadmap, plan, decision) into a polished, audience-specific communication.

Dispatches

comms-lead (lead). Pull substance from the relevant agent first (delivery-monitor for status, product-manager for roadmap, etc.) — never fabricate content.

Inputs

The source substance/artifact, knowledge/stakeholder-map.md, knowledge/product-context.md. For a steering committee: knowledge/portfolio/, knowledge/status/, knowledge/financials.md, knowledge/raid-log.md, knowledge/change-log.md, and recent gate records in knowledge/programs/.

Steps

  1. Identify the audience and the decision/action they need.
  2. Lead with the bottom line (BLUF); match altitude (executives → outcomes/decisions; teams → detail).
  3. Use RAG with reason + action; quantify where possible; flag uncertainty honestly.
  4. Format to the requested medium (one-pager, deck outline, email, announcement); keep it scannable.
  5. Put detail in appendices or link to the canonical knowledge/ artifact.
  6. Check every number traces to a knowledge/ file. A deliverable is a rendering, not a source — if you need a fact that doesn't exist upstream, send it back to the agent that owns it rather than deriving it here.

Methods

standards/communication-standards.md (primary), knowledge/methods/roadmapping.md (audience views).

Output

Start from the matching template — templates/exec-update.md, templates/status-report.md, or templates/steerco-pack.md for a steering committee. Save to knowledge/deliverables/ as YYYY-MM-DD-<audience>-<topic>.md; log only consequential communication decisions to knowledge/decision-log.md. Circulated deliverables are never edited — supersede them with a new dated file so the record of what was said, and when, stays intact. Follow standards/communication-standards.md and standards/document-standards.md.

Optional sync

If knowledge/integrations.md configures Slack/Notion, offer to post/share the deliverable there. Skip if not configured.


Created by Colin Beck<br> LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/beckcolin/<br> GitHub: https://github.com/link7373

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.